In Groff v. DeJoy, decided today (June 29, 2023), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified the standard for employers to determine what constitutes an undue burden that would permit an employer to reject an employee’s request for a religious accommodation. In doing so, the Court reconsidered the long standing de minimis standard and discussed the impact of the burden of an accommodation on an employee's co-workers.
Listen in and find out how the Supreme Court ruled on these issues.
Read about it here: https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/u-s-supreme-court-clarifies-standard-for-workplace-religious-accommodations
Comments or questions: Contact Mark Chumley at mchumley@kmklaw.com or visit www.kmklaw.com
Music :
Jamming with Leon by texasradiofish (c) copyright 2020 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial (3.0) license. http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/texasradiofish/61983 Ft: Scomber
In Groff v. DeJoy, decided today (June 29, 2023), the U.S. Supreme Court clarified the standard for employers to determine what constitutes an undue burden that would permit an employer to reject an employee’s request for a religious accommodation. In doing so, the Court reconsidered the long standing de minimis standard and discussed the impact of the burden of an accommodation on an employee's co-workers.
Listen in and find out how the Supreme Court ruled on these issues.
Read about it here: https://www.kmklaw.com/labor-employment/u-s-supreme-court-clarifies-standard-for-workplace-religious-accommodations
Comments or questions: Contact Mark Chumley at mchumley@kmklaw.com or visit www.kmklaw.com
Music :
Jamming with Leon by texasradiofish (c) copyright 2020 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial (3.0) license. http://dig.ccmixter.org/files/texasradiofish/61983 Ft: Scomber