The Arterburn Radio Transmission Podcast
#24 Paratruther - Fauci’s Dark Legacy: Gain-of-Function & Deep State Deceptions
What if Anthony Fauci isn't the hero the media portrays him to be? In our latest episode of Paratruther, we tackle the controversial rise of Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic, likening his sudden prominence to a horror movie villain coming into the limelight. Through an eye-opening conversation with Mr. Anderson, we peel back the layers of Fauci’s extensive career at the NIH and NIAID, spotlighting his involvement in significant, yet contentious events such as the 1986 act shielding pharmaceutical companies and the controversies of the AIDS crisis. We don’t shy away from critiquing mainstream narratives, drawing parallels between Fauci's ascent and other political figures, and questioning the media’s role in shaping public perception.
Gain-of-function research, Fauci's alleged deceit, and the ethical implications of risky scientific endeavors are at the heart of our discussion. We dissect Fauci’s public statements and private communications during the COVID-19 pandemic, scrutinizing inconsistencies and the potential cover-ups surrounding the virus's origins. From Operation Paperclip to the weaponization of diseases like Lyme disease, our critical analysis seeks to uncover the hidden motives and broader implications of Fauci's decisions on public health policies. This chapter is sure to leave you questioning the integrity of those in power and their true agendas.
We wrap up with reflections on influential figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kary Mullis, examining their criticisms and the broader societal impact of the pandemic response. The discussion touches on everything from early COVID-19 predictions and the mysterious vaping illnesses of 2019 to the more conspiratorial aspects like cryptocurrency patents and 5G technology. With a blend of skepticism, humor, and critical inquiry, we challenge you to rethink the narratives and consider the deeper, often unsettling truths shaping our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking and engaging exploration of one of the most significant health crises of our time.
What if Anthony Fauci isn't the hero the media portrays him to be? In our latest episode of Paratruther, we tackle the controversial rise of Fauci during the COVID-19 pandemic, likening his sudden prominence to a horror movie villain coming into the limelight. Through an eye-opening conversation with Mr. Anderson, we peel back the layers of Fauci’s extensive career at the NIH and NIAID, spotlighting his involvement in significant, yet contentious events such as the 1986 act shielding pharmaceutical companies and the controversies of the AIDS crisis. We don’t shy away from critiquing mainstream narratives, drawing parallels between Fauci's ascent and other political figures, and questioning the media’s role in shaping public perception.
Gain-of-function research, Fauci's alleged deceit, and the ethical implications of risky scientific endeavors are at the heart of our discussion. We dissect Fauci’s public statements and private communications during the COVID-19 pandemic, scrutinizing inconsistencies and the potential cover-ups surrounding the virus's origins. From Operation Paperclip to the weaponization of diseases like Lyme disease, our critical analysis seeks to uncover the hidden motives and broader implications of Fauci's decisions on public health policies. This chapter is sure to leave you questioning the integrity of those in power and their true agendas.
We wrap up with reflections on influential figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Kary Mullis, examining their criticisms and the broader societal impact of the pandemic response. The discussion touches on everything from early COVID-19 predictions and the mysterious vaping illnesses of 2019 to the more conspiratorial aspects like cryptocurrency patents and 5G technology. With a blend of skepticism, humor, and critical inquiry, we challenge you to rethink the narratives and consider the deeper, often unsettling truths shaping our world today. Tune in for a thought-provoking and engaging exploration of one of the most significant health crises of our time.
On Friday, the 13th March of 2020, president Trump signed an executive order, an emergency executive order, unleashing massive amount of funds and government overreach and oversight, basically laying the path for COVID-1984, what we now can look back on as the greatest psychological operation in the history of mankind. And it's very apropos that it was on Friday the 13th because, just like Jason Voorhees at the bottom of Crystal Lake when President Trump signed that executive order, from the murky bottom of the deep state murkiness Up comes Anthony Fauci ascending, just like Jason Voorhees. I was just thinking of that analogy. We want to talk about Anthony Fauci today here on Paratruther. Welcome everybody back to another episode of Paratruther. I'm your host, tony Arterburn, and I'll be joined today by Mr Anderson and his brain. He brought all his research and looking forward to this conversation. We've been texting back and forth for a while.
Speaker 1:I wanted to just take the subject matter of this demonic Keebler elf and put it down in audio, because I've talked about this man and, to be honest, I heard a little bit throughout the years as a researcher, you know his name popped up every once in a while, but I didn't even think of him during that time, that first quarter of 2020. He didn't come to mind, but now it's pretty much ubiquitous. And when he's a lot like Trump in a way, pretty much ubiquitous, and when he's a lot like Trump in a way, it's like whatever you think about the scandemic or what happened in the last four years, fauci is going to represent whatever that is in your brain, to you kind of like a Trump. And I wanted to lay out, you know, some of the well, some of the facts here, because if you go to look up something about this man, then you're going to get pages and pages of fact checks and disinformation is everywhere.
Speaker 1:The mainline search engines are absolutely in the bag for whatever entity is backing Anthony Fauci, and so I want to dive into this. This is uh, thanks for coming back and um again, this is paratruther with mr anderson. His passport expires on september 11 2001 I'm opening a gofundme for that, yeah it's good to see you again.
Speaker 2:My friend, I gotta do really well um, I'm doing well, man, I'm looking forward to this. And you're right, you and I, for a long time, have been calling him the little demonic keebler elf. So I think that's a better description than what alex jones has been doing with this leprechaun, because I don't know what he's making in that tree for it up there but I don't want to go in. But apparently a lot of eel fudge cookies, real fudge packer, this fudge it's not delicious, it's not good for you, whatever.
Speaker 1:Whatever he's making um laced with certainly isn't good for the animals that he's had tortured as well oh my gosh.
Speaker 2:Yeah, we're gonna get into that. But another interesting date was the date he was born. He's was a Christmas Eve miracle he was born on December 24th.
Speaker 1:Okay, he's a Christmas Eve miracle.
Speaker 2:The Christmas Eve miracle ghost of Christmas passed. A couple of weeks ago he came back on the scene. We were talking about that guy behind him who was a January 6th defendant just making faces. And I love that, because that's exactly what you have to do. You get up bright and early, you get your coffee, you have a good breakfast, right, maybe some Wheaties, and you get there. You get your seat directly behind Fauci. Just ridicule him the entire time because that's what he deserves.
Speaker 2:But yeah, if you try to find a lot of the backstory on this guy before he became a physician at the National Institute of Health, there's not a lot there. Like he literally went from undergraduate at College of the Holy Cross because he has a Catholic background and then got a doctorate at Cornell and immediately went to the NIH. It says his father is a pharmacist. Makes a lot of sense. But it also says I mean I would like to fact check, check wikipedia on some of this it says he was really good at basketball and baseball. It's like I can show you him throwing a baseball at a nationals game at the opening pitch. That guy never played baseball he looks.
Speaker 1:He looks like he has the athleticism of gollum from lord of the Rings, or at least as the I think, at least as the, the soul of Gollum, or whatever, whatever that's worth. And yeah, you're, you're absolutely right, he, he gets all these accolades. It's, it's almost like Obama was a construct of a person like you know, hanging out with Bill Ayers, and then you know, no, there's no record of him at some of these places he's supposed to be. Nobody remembers him at Columbia University, all this stuff. But he's great, you know, and he's. They make these people up. I know early press conferences with Fauci in 2020. And this, this female reporter from one of the majors was like have you ever seen a more sexy man?
Speaker 2:Yes.
Speaker 1:What? And it was just bizarre and the whole thing was so. You know, and I always say this, you know, because I'm not a partisan hack, I just like to talk about the truth and research and it's made my show a lot less profitable. But, people, you know, when you look at Fauci and you wonder how did he get to the point where he's running the country, because that's effectively and I brought this up before like when Trump is running for re-election, and I got in trouble by, you know, a few people turned off by my remarks, but I'm like so if Trump's re-elected, does that make Fauci president automatically, or do we have to do another executive order?
Speaker 2:Right. That's where Trump really began to lose me, because I was somebody who kind of fell for that deception in the beginning. I mean, there is a hunger in this country for a populist, somebody outside of the system who could champion things that you want to be championed. But as soon as I saw him give the reins to Fauci, I mean I remember talking to my dad I was like he lost me. I'm not even going to vote for him. He's going to shut down the country. He's going to lock it down and hand over all of these sort of executive decisions to that guy right there. It's like this is the dumbest thing that he could possibly do, which means he's doing it on purpose. There's no way he could be this foolish. So that's where he absolutely lost me. And to that guy.
Speaker 2:I mean, every time I look at Fauci it reminds me of this Bill Burr bit where he gets real animated, amped up and he's like nerds freaking nerds run the world. It's like you know those guys in elementary school who would kick out playing kickball or strike out playing kickball, which is virtually impossible. You see a penny loafer going down the baseline. That's Anthony Fauci. That's exactly what he's describing. Is people like him. So I don't know how he got into a position of such prominence, where he was, you know, at the NIH first, and then the NIAID right and became director in 83. It just boggles the mind. But I mean, my mind looks way too much into things and I see stuff that's there that's not there. But even if you look at NIAID, what are the last three letters of that?
Speaker 1:Well, that's right with it. You know he was right there on the forefront in the 80s with the AZT medication. Yes, and let's not forget, there's a little side note to his career and I think what cemented him for the establishment, the deep state, the cabal, agents of Satan, whatever you want to. You know, and I'm being redundant, but if you look at the 1986 act that he and Ronald Reagan did now if you go to try to find anything where his he was directly involved in the 1986 act to indemnify and hold harmless the pharmaceutical companies over vaccines. That's why we in this country you can't really do anything if you're a vaccine injury. They have a special court set up. That was all done under the Reagan administration and he was right there in the mix of that. I mean that's as in on behalf of the pharmaceutical companies and the government itself.
Speaker 2:Right, he's always. I mean eight administrations of eight different presidents. He was always there and Trump was the one who just outright handed him the keys to the kingdom, which is just reason in and of itself enough not to ever trust Trump, but people still do. But yeah, so AIDS that whole crisis started churning up, accelerating when he took over. So you mentioned AZT. I don't even know how to to really pronounce it. It's like azitothymidine or something like that. Yeah, but that thing was terrible. I mean, it was basically toxic.
Speaker 2:And the thing that outrages me the most about this, like most people are paying a little bit of attention, know about the beagles that Fauci did experiments on. Well, he also did experiments on foster children, so children who belong to the state, and he did ACT trials on them and in one trial, 10 children died, four confirmed of blood poisoning. They didn't even investigate this shit for like decades. So he just you look at all the things he does. I mean it's like things that are abominations to God, and one is messing with children. And he had no problem doing that with those trials. And why was it so convenient? Because these children didn't have guardians. The state was their guardian. So, pay attention everybody. This is how the state wants to treat you when they own your children or they think they do.
Speaker 1:Well, that's right and that. And then, if you really studied the so-called elite and the Bohemian Grove Bilderberg types, if you really get down into the depths of the darkness, then you find that if you're willing to hurt children it's what it looks like you get rewarded for that. That's how they know they can trust you. You know if you can go that far. So he's earning his stripes. And then you find out, you know, look the whole thing with 2020 and looking back on it, because I'm getting you know flashbacks of 2020 now because we're in 2024 and it's, you know, part two, the reckoning, you know, with Biden and Trump, and we just had that just the most disastrous debate I've ever seen, not even debate, but political, any type of political press conference event, and I've studied politics my entire life. I've never seen anything like that. But it kind of harkens back and reminds you of 2020 and all that was going on.
Speaker 1:And Fauci gets put out front. There's this turn of the country where he was waiting for the next directive from him, and you just start who is this guy? What is his raison d'etre, what is his reason? Like what? Why is he here? And it's pure evil. I mean, the really there, there is no, there's no, uh, any way around it. I mean, you go look at it, I'm sure you have something on this.
Speaker 2:but his emails early on yep, where he was, he said it's absolutely natural, there's no way it was engineered in a lab. And then he says that on record. And then you see the emails that are uncovered in january 2020. People he works with are saying this thing looks engineered, tony.
Speaker 1:So yeah, well, not only that but he was telling people privately how to treat it you know what to do to like kind of a prophylactic against. It would be like vitamin d and vitamin c and you know all this stuff and he go in publicly and say there's nothing you can really do get your mask. You wear your mask for first, but first he said not to wear a mask.
Speaker 2:yep and eric swalwell in there, eric nukem right, he's going to nuke us all. He said stop wearing face masks. Nancy Pelosi, remember, said come to Chinatown, it's great here. They did all of this.
Speaker 2:I mean they were welcoming it and it makes no sense because Fauci later in the summer of 2020, said, in all seriousness, this type of coronavirus, this respiratory virus that led to a pandemic, has always been his professional worst nightmare. It's like bullshit. This has been like your biggest wet dream. I mean, like you didn't prepare for this at all and you downplayed its significance right at the very beginning. It's the bizarrest thing I've ever seen. So I mean, as you were kind of alluding to before, it's like where did this guy come from? And he reminds me of what you've described many times as a post-Turtle right. It looks like they selected him at an early age, that he was going to do this, that he was not a person of integrity and he was intelligent enough to get doctorates and get some of the prestige. But I mean, if you see all these things, I mean what's it called? With the simplest explanation, is a hot to his razor.
Speaker 1:Right.
Speaker 2:Hot to his razor.
Speaker 1:I think that's something different. I think I think that's a completely different reference.
Speaker 2:Yeah, something like I've been saying it wrong.
Speaker 1:I think, I think you're saying it wrong now. I don't know if you've been saying it wrong in the past. No, you, you're so right and that's that's kind of what I want to do the show about and talk about him, because now he's become something else like it's almost like a misdirection. Uh, because you look at him and you think, well, if you can just hold this man accountable. But he's just a representation of a of a deep rot, deep rot within the foundations of this country, with who runs it, the ruling class, whatever he is, it's not really him, it's what he tracks back to. And you look at somebody like Rand Paul who's been grilling Fauci and again, it's something David Knight brings up, and I happen to agree with it the gain of function, stuff, the, the Wuhan lab, all that right, it, it, it's important.
Speaker 1:But I've I've come to the I don't know. I've come to the opinion that it doesn't matter if, if COVID-1984, you know, if that came from a meteor or the Wuhan lab, or it was spontaneous from nature, whatever. It is like if it was somebody ate bat soup at a wet market, I really don't care. I mean, I know I've gotten a lot of flack for this, I don't care because it didn't do that much. Whatever it was Right, but it was the response to it, right? That's the. That's what I care about. So I think when you get down and into the weeds, like with ran paul about the wuhan lab and gain of function and all this stuff, it just builds credence for the reasons for the lockdown, which is that's what hurt us. That's what the. That's what they really truly wanted. That's what hurt us. That's what they really truly wanted. That was the trial run for the Great Reset. That's when they got to run all their social experiments.
Speaker 2:There's so much there. And he was asked about this in January 2020 when all these things started ramping up. And I remember I was the one going to Lowe's and Home Depot in Taiwan and getting N95 masks and everyone made fun of me and they're like why are you doing that? I was like because I don't know what this is and it's going to. I don't care what they say, it's going to end up here. And, of course, I was right.
Speaker 2:But he was asked about lockdowns and he said they're completely impractical. How could you lock down places like New York and Los Angeles and two historically they've shown to have no net benefit to them, so he was completely against them, right? So it wasn't scientific, it was a public policy that he made on behalf of other people who are pulling his strings, and this whole thing just screams ritual to me. I mean, we have william ramsay on one of the shows, which was a really good show, and he was talking about 9-11, alistair crowley and all the rituals and numerology associated with it. Well, when you actually they uncovered this, the intercept showed, through materials they gathered from Freedom of Information request, that Fauci supported gain of function research Right At the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We all knew that that's not the big thing here, the grant amount, and you can look this up.
Speaker 2:I remember here the grant amount and you can look this up $666,000 on the nose. Come on, what do you think that's about? Of course they're doing a ritual. It doesn't mean the ritual is going to work. Okay, I mean, aleister Crowley did a lot of sex magic. I don't think he burned the Antichrist or anything came out of that. But the point is that they do things a specific way. So when you seeing these numbers, you should really pull back and be like whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. There's no reason, there's no way. A bunch of people saw that number and didn't think of that. It's used on purpose are you?
Speaker 1:are you aware of the uh, spars uh simulation from johns hopkins of 2017? Is 2017? No, well, so johns hopkins, in 2017, put out this really detailed simulation about the spars uh pandemic. Right, and it was it. Basically, if you lay it over, uh, what happened in 2020 pretty much matches up like what the response was, what the rollout was, and there's even a Fauci figure. Okay, but in spars, I believe, the way that it turns out is that that person is eventually like he's held up high in esteem and then the vax is a disaster. The economic consequences are a disaster. A lot of people get hurt, all this other and then they, the celebrities who back it, or turn that people, turn on them right, and then there's a fauci and figure I, you know, you've been using this term fauci and bargain, kind of like faust, you know right.
Speaker 1:But there is that same simulation that went on in Johns Hopkins. It looks like and if you really, because it looked for a while it looked like Fauci was going to be offered up in a way like this is a you know, you had your meteoric rise, you had this, you know people were waiting with bated breath to see what the policy was going to be for the lockdown and whatever you know, for the rollout of warp speed. And then, you know, then there's going to be like this downfall. We didn't see that. No, he basically just got to walk away. The media didn't turn. There was no, I mean, I think there was the grassroots, especially the. You know politics on the ground. The people definitely wanted to see something, but the most you've gotten is the, the, the grilling, you know, which is from, you know, from Congress, and that's pretty much toothless now.
Speaker 2:Oh yeah, I mean, like even Marjorie Taylor Greene I refuse to call you doctor, sir Like, could you please make the lady from whatever georgia refer to him as doctor, please? This is official title. It's like, what's the point in that that? That theater's ridiculous. But yeah, I think he was really nervous about the prospect of that.
Speaker 2:And why do I say that? Because I remember watching um bits and pieces of congressional hearings and there was one towards the end where he was visibly shaking, where he was talking to Rand Paul. I mean he thought, okay, they have me, and the reason this is being publicized so much is they're going to throw me into the volcano, which you always say, which I like that phrase. But I think he was worried about it. But he did. He just rode into the sunset after his Vanity Fair cover shoot. He literally just walked away and I don't know how, but he politically maneuvered all throughout his career and people who are actual scientists, and especially those in his field, were not impressed by him. Right? People who can do do not become administrators for the government. They stay in the government, they stay in the labs, they continue to be scientists. And there was one guy in particular we were talking about before that you brought up and did you have that snippet, tony?
Speaker 1:Yeah, before I get to that, I want to. This is an article I want to read. Just the headline 30,000 foot view of this guy and I, I wondered why and I I don't know why, I wondered, but, uh, I thought this would have come out sooner because that's the. This is the first thing I thought. If, if you go back and listen to the archives of my show, like 2020, that cause, I was doing a show every single day, you know, on on truth frequency radio and Radio, and then San Antonio. I had the replays and stuff, and I was even on WWCR. I was doing a lot of back-to-back radio because there's a lot to cover and I kept waiting for something like this to hit. You know, like somebody would have uncovered it, but I just went back to the archives and this wasn't that long ago.
Speaker 1:By the way, this was published in September 27, 2023. It's a Newsweek article and, again, nothing came of it. But let's read the headline about COVID Republicans claim. Now, if it's the Republicans getting close to claiming something like that, that means it's obviously been true for a long time Like if they've got the courage enough to even put it like call the media and say we have. We really think this happened because we've got probably like banker's boxes full of documents and they're just really waiting for it. You know they wait for it not to be relevant. If you notice, about the republicans and this again newsweek, the gop-led house select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic alleges that former chief white house medical advisor was escorted by the central intelligence agency and influenced on the origins of covid19 agency and influenced on the origins of COVID-19. So and I believe I've, if memory serves me, that Tucker Carlson brought this up- yeah.
Speaker 1:I'm sure, but that's kind of as far as it goes. It is unknown who provided the information to the subcommittee, though the letter mentions one individual Special Agent, brett Rowland, and requests that the IG, the Inspector General, make him available for a voluntary transcribed interview. So nothing came of this, but this was before everything kicked off. But he this was before everything kicked off and there was a meeting with the cia and I again, if you look at the strangeness and everybody know and I think we're all just kind of still from 2020, just looking when you reverse engineer it, it's hard to make heads or tails, but you know you got an entire world interlinking. You know the Rockefeller Foundation called it lockstep.
Speaker 1:Right you know on the lockdowns, you know, and those governments who didn't comply. So there's something with the intelligence community, with banking, with all, because we had the largest exodus of CEOs in history in the last quarter of 2019. I was covering that on my show. I was like this high strangeness, anybody else paying attention to this? I mean, there was massive amounts of funds being pumped into the markets they called them the repo markets or they're still called that or the overnights were the clearinghouses of currency and just untold, like trillions of dollars being pumped just to keep the markets alive. And then, all of a sudden, we hit this strange and I'm like you, in January of 2020, I was on a radio show.
Speaker 1:There's a friend of mine in San Antonio had a radio show, the Chris Miller Show, and I remember like I have a recording of it. It was like mid-January and he's like what do you make of this thing, this virus thing out of China and people, what's happening over there? And I said I think it's going to be the biggest story of our lifetime. And because I just saw, like I go there's something here that they're building something to roll this out, and this guy's at the forefront of that, this out right, and this guy's at the forefront of that, and what you make of him now, I don't. He never really had to answer for the for no, what he truly is, and it's not just about gain of function. This is a deep state criminal, a murderer, it's what he is like. He literally like not only the like you mentioned, the foster children, but but with AZT and AIDS. And I want to get, and this is where it's going to lead up to this clip.
Speaker 2:Did you know what he said about that too, like his language. Sometimes it's like that has to be intentional. He said in response to that later, because he flip flopped on whether or not you could be in a household and, through routine contact, get AIDS, and he said you could definitely. And then he, of course, spoke it out of both sides of the mouth and said you couldn't. And later he said the poor gays received a very raw deal on this. It's like raw, but yeah, so he botched that and he botched um, making all these other, uh, different types of vaccines, including like a, a new, beefed up version of the Anthrax vaccine. It's like how is this guy still in power? But he was. He was right there.
Speaker 1:I mean, can you imagine having access to all of this wealth and power and technology? And the best you can do is make poison.
Speaker 2:Right.
Speaker 1:Like I mean, and that's indicative of what we have in this country past World War II, and Anthony Fauci is a representation of Operation Paperclip, that's, we imported the Nazis. That's what we did, that was our. You know, that was the war. After the war was who's going to get the best Nazis? And we got the best ones. You know we had Wernher von Braun and you know Disney put him up on shows. Disney put him up on shows. But the Nazi science, joseph Mengele stuff, the fluoride in the water, that kind of stuff that came from post-Operation Paperclip, fort Detrick, lyme disease which, by the way, mr Anderson, we need to do a whole show on Lyme disease and ticks and weaponization of ticks.
Speaker 2:Yeah, we hit on it on Plum Island.
Speaker 1:Yes, we hit on it. But we need to do one because, you know, I'm in the Ozarks a lot and have to deal with ticks and they're everywhere. I saw a deer the other day. It just looked awful. It was, you know, just riddled with ticks. Ticks are really bad lately because of the chemtrails and every time somebody asks me about climate change or talk about climate, I go, yeah, they're changing the climate. I can see that they're doing it. I mean, people are spraying it in the air. But Fauci's an extension of that.
Speaker 2:Yep, absolutely, and he tried to in so many instances accelerate this idea that there was going to be a pandemic. And I just want to talk you mentioned about that study in 2017. Well, also, event 201, lots of people aren't familiar with- that.
Speaker 2:That happened in 2019. And it was literally a war game exercise based on the premise that a coronavirus starts being able to be transmitted from swine or pigs in China. Being able to be transmitted from swine or pigs in China. It creates a worldwide pandemic. But we have to roll out a vaccination. How do we get everyone vaccinated? How do we control people? Using the media? This happened in the fall of 2019. You know, I mean, come on people and the other thing about John Hopkins Medical Institute that was created by John D Rockefeller yes, about john hopkins medical institute that was created by john d rockefeller, yes. So I mean, of course, it's always a part of these war game exercises, and so was the bill and melinda gates foundation. So was the world economic forum, all your players.
Speaker 2:They were all involved in it because they were helping up real quick I mean I I just I think that they were going to release it. I mean, there was that lady on Tucker. Do you remember her? The virologist? She was from Hong Kong.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And she just kind of she's a Chinese virologist and she said this thing was definitely manmade and definitely released by China on purpose. And she just, and he said, how do you know that? Like, how do you, how would you describe it to someone like me who's not very sophisticated in the same ways you are? And she said it's like a Frankenstein virus. And she started talking about you know, putting like the head of a bear on the body of a whatever and going through it kind of reminded me of man bear pig. Do you remember that in South Park, al Gore's always, always warning people man bear pig? But yeah, so she went on and kudos to Tucker, he had her on. And then after that her social media went black and I was like, regardless of whether or not you think what she's saying is entirely true, why would she put herself at risk like that, unless she, she felt very convicted one way about something. She, she lives in hong kong. They will find her and her family.
Speaker 1:You know what I mean no, I mean anytime you speak up, especially, especially coming out of China, I mean you're putting your life at risk. Well, you're putting your life at risk here. So you go against, if you go against the narrative machine, and you're putting your at least your financial life at risk, but most likely you're putting your life at risk. And you know I was looking. There's so many timelines here and you know I was looking. There's so many timelines here. I know, like as we got, it was I got to thinking about as we started talking, but you know it was Bill Gates in meeting with Congress in August of 2019, which I want to get to August of 2019. I'm going to, I was trying to. You know, if you try to find anything anymore, it's so much has been scrubbed yeah, it has it.
Speaker 1:It just folks. It is not like it used to be. I mean, you can try certain search engines, but thank god for things like rumble and other places where you can, there's a searchable database of videos. I have a video I want to play here in a second, but like the way back machine yeah, like they scrub so much. Now, I was trying to find something and I know that there was. Um, there was an act at the end of 2019 where Congress started to change the definition of vaccines.
Speaker 2:Yes, you talked about this a lot, tony. I remember hearing it, cause I hadn't heard it before you'd mentioned it. They changed that, um, they changed the definition of gain of function after they'd been accused of funding gain of function research, when there was a moratorium on gain of function research from 2014 to 2017.
Speaker 1:Yes.
Speaker 2:They changed it there and they changed it to well, like you have to like, express your intent to make something you know more deadly as a virus, more virulent or whatever. They changed the definition of it.
Speaker 1:I was looking through. I went to DuckDuckGo because it still is curated.
Speaker 2:It's unbelievable. I was just trying to find that old Kyle Dunn again.
Speaker 1:Yeah, the clip you were telling me. This is CNBC in 2019. Bill Gates my best investment turned $10 billion into $200 billion. Over the past two decades, bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated a bit more than $10 billion into mainly three groups the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization. So this is where his investments go.
Speaker 1:But I know that it was in August of 2019 that Bill Gates is meeting with Congress, and I know this from research folks. I mean, I just recently shredded all the docs and stories that I had, but back in my office in Branson, I had literally thousands of pages of articles where I'd take them and I saved all my notes from my daily broadcast because I remember going. That's in my memory. I was able to stick with a lot of this stuff. Even though we've. There's been a lot of A lot of life happened since then. A lot of stuff happened in the world, but that was just again. These things are coinciding, but this is what Mr Anderson and I wanted to get to.
Speaker 1:2019 was a very weird year and you're about. You know. This is why I say the executive order. Friday the 13th, trump signs this executive order and up from the murky bottom of Camp Crystal Lake. Here comes Anthony Fauci, like Jason Voorhees, but before that, there's a lot of groundwork being laid. Yep, and let's go pull this up. I'm going to share the screen and we're going to play this man and this. By the way, this is going to be. I'm glad I'm immortalizing this on Paratrooper, because it was hard to find, yep. This used to be everywhere, everywhere, but they've scrubbed it, so let's share the screen here. This is dr terry mullis, the inventor of what we would be we come to known as the pcr test, and we'll describe that here in a second. You guys probably nobel prize, right nobel prize.
Speaker 1:he won the no Nobel Prize for this, so let's play a clip here. This is a 1996 interview of Carey Mullis.
Speaker 3:What is it about humanity that wants to go to all the details and stuff and listen? You know these guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. You know he doesn't know anything really about anything, and I'd say that to his face Nothing there and start talking. You know he doesn't know anything really about anything, and I'd say that to his face nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it's got a virus in there you'll know it. He doesn't understand electron microscopy and he doesn't understand medicine. He should not be in a position like he's in.
Speaker 3:Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don't know anything about what's going on on the bottom. You know those guys have got an agenda which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They've got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to and they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera. You can't expect the sheep to really respect the best and the brightest. They don't know the difference really.
Speaker 3:I mean, I like humans, don't get me wrong but basically, basically, there is a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn't a really good scientist. I mean, that's a problem, that's a main problem actually with science, I'd say in this century, because science is being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don't understand it. Okay, who do we trust Fauci? Fauci didn't know enough to you know, if Fauci wants to get on television with somebody who knows a little bit about this stuff and debate him, he could easily do it because he's been asked. I mean, I've had a lot of people president of the University of South Carolina ask Fauci if he'd come down there and debate me on the stage in front of the student body, because I wanted somebody who was from the other side to come down there and balance my, because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me. I need to have somebody else down here that's going to tell me.
Speaker 3:But he didn't want to do it.
Speaker 2:Yeah, and I think that was a general consensus. I mean he botched the whole AIDS thing from the beginning. Consensus I mean he botched the whole AIDS thing from the beginning. They were like two pass forward and one was developing a vaccine and the second, you know, to prevent transmission at all and the second was to manage it. So something that was a terminal thing, a death sentence, became something that's manageable illness or disease like it is now. And of course he he went with the former right, he's all about vaccines and inoculating as many people as possible to make the pharmaceutical companies a lot of money.
Speaker 2:But there was somebody who was really mad and kind of investigated. His name was Bruce Nussbaum and he said the same thing. He echoed the same sentiment. Basically the best scientists do not become administrators. The best scientists stay in the labs. The best scientists do not become administrators. The best scientists stay in the labs.
Speaker 2:So his whole study was just basically in the early 1990s about all the failures the government effectively had in managing the AIDS crisis or pandemic. So it's just, there are lots of people I encourage people to do their own research, but most people don't really think of him highly who are scientists as a scientist, and the crazy thing about that is, if you look at the system, I had to write down one of these. I couldn't believe it. One of these statistics. But for almost 20, over the course of 20 years, fauci was the 13th most cited scientist in the world among about 3 million applicants. You know how that happens Because he controls the purse strings. So if he controls the money, he's going to ride on the shoulders of all those little minion scientists, right, and that's what he did. So he can get his name up there, so he can get the prestige, he can get the accolades. He can get the medal of freedom in 2008.
Speaker 2:For doing what of freedom in 2008? For doing what? For not doing anything, but, in my opinion, just working up and slowly boiling the frog to get to a point to where he could enact all the measures he did during 2020 and onward, because it was, it was incremental. He kept chicken littling all the time. It was the bird flu, right, h1n1. And then it was some other ones and he just kept ratcheting it and ratcheting it up. And the important thing about all of that was there was one case and I forget what the name of the initiative was, but he divested like five and a half or redirected five and a half billion dollars that was intended for, you know, national Institute of Health, niaid, like that sort of public health initiative, and redirected it to bioweapons research and nothing really came out of it. But one thing did they laid the groundwork for the FDA to be able to use emergency use authorization. To be able to use emergency use authorization.
Speaker 1:It's critical, critical infrastructure. That's right, because you're trying to scare the hell out of people.
Speaker 2:Right.
Speaker 1:And we've been primed for this my whole life. You know, whether it's in works of fiction, like you know novels, like Stephen King wrote the Stand, if you've read that or watched. I watched the movie when I was a kid and then I read it, you know when I was in the military and you know just prime for like a weapon. You know weapons grade. You know a gain of function virus escapes from a lab and it's so deadly, you know, and it's, it's. You know the. The. It's the flu, uh times, the black plague divided by AIDS. You know, plus Ebola, it's like the worst thing ever and it. And you know they, they prime you for that Right and uh, he's just like the, he's like the spokesperson for it.
Speaker 2:He's like the false prophet to me. I mean, when it talks biblically about the false prophet, it's just what it reminds me of. He performs these miracles and he is lauded by a great number of people and he gives all the praise to the beast, the system in place. He's just a puppet. So what I was describing happened in 2004,. That emergency use authorization and I had to look it up. Operation BiosShield is what it's called for any of those interested. But the year prior to that, in 2003, again, it's National Institute of Health, it's NIAID, right, he redirected 120 million away from infectious disease research so he can look into the development of a new anthrax vaccine, which he never delivered on, by the way. But in 2008, he still received the Medal of Freedom, which is like the highest honor a civilian can receive. But I mean. That reminded me when I was researching that I remember you had the anthrax vaccine, didn't you say it was one of the weirdest sensations that you've had.
Speaker 1:Yeah, it was. Or did I put words in your mouth? No, your, your recall is great, uh. No, I've talked a little bit about this.
Speaker 1:I, before I, was deployed into iraq. There it was, you know, there wasn't much time to do, but we were the first to go into afghanistan. So, like, literally, like it was like they gave us, weirdly enough, like they told us to take antibiotics, I didn't take them. They gave us some stuff for malaria. I didn't take that either. So there wasn't, I didn't have to get jabbed a lot going into Afghanistan.
Speaker 1:But when we got back and started rotating back through to get ready for the invasion of Iraq, to carry out the, the neocon class experiment, I was given a ton, like they, and I just wasn't expecting it. I didn't understand. You know the scope of things, like I do now, and you start lining up and of course, they give you the smallpox vaccine, which is you know they take the. They take a is you know they take the. They take a sample and, like you know, press it underneath your skin. So it's got a little bit of the cowpox actually infects you with pox, but the the same. They give you all the things at the same time.
Speaker 1:But I remember when they gave me the anthrax vaccine and gave it to me with a gun, and when it hit my arm. I've never felt this sensation since or before, but it actually I felt it in my heart. I felt my heart pump it and I'll never forget I was, you know, very strong. I was a 23-year-old guy and you know, even just getting back from Afghanistan, I was still in good shape, but, man, I hit that and I was still in good shape, but man, I hit that and and I I really had a weird time with it and and it made me like giving all the vaccines at once and I had, I had actual some of the pox and stuff started to come up, like I had like rashes on my neck.
Speaker 1:It had really weird reactions. And of course you had to get I had to get boosters for this crap, like, like in Iraq, like you know, we'd already taken over. Like there was the whole thing. Was the, the? The reason for the excuse for the anthrax vaccine is hey, saddam's got weapons of mass destruction and he could unleash some anthrax. Well, spoiler alert, we gave it to him.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:I mean, we gave him all this stuff during the Cold War and his war with Iran, because Iran's a proxy for Russia and Russia's Soviet Union. We did all that. I mean Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, so we know he had stockpiles of this stuff. But anyway, after we'd taken it all over, why are they still giving me shots? No-transcript, probably just trying to make one that was super duper. You know that had even more. You know squalene, even more, 20 more squalene. Uh, whatever he wanted to put in it.
Speaker 2:But y'all scream for squalene even more, 20%, more squalene.
Speaker 1:whatever he wanted to put in it, y'all scream for squalene.
Speaker 2:That's what Gulf War Syndrome supposedly came from. Yeah well, the thing that doesn't make sense about allocating $120 million or redirecting it away from infectious disease research is what does that have to do with, you know, keeping the public safe? How is that a public expense or project? It makes no sense. But I remember you explaining that to me, because I caught you one time in a public bathroom starting Kruger hands and you said that's why I'm just playing. What am I? I'm just playing. It bowled all on his nose.
Speaker 1:I got a Kruger hand. I got a Kruger hand on my neck.
Speaker 2:You know I never leave home without one, ladiesugerrand?
Speaker 1:I got a Krugerrand on my neck. I never leave home without one.
Speaker 2:Ladies and gentlemen, I think that's a good policy. I love those necklaces. But you mentioned too the Iraqi war. But another tidbit I found that was interesting was the day actually going back to AZT and the AIDS epidemic when the FDA approved that breakthrough drug, azt. It was March 19th 1987, march 19th was operation Iraqi freedom day. It's also Pentecost. Arthur C Clark died on that day. But most yeah, most bizarre, most bizarre it's the day Woodrow Wilson signed the standard time act.
Speaker 1:That's good, that's good.
Speaker 2:I like these linkages, all that stuff means that good, I like these linkages, all that stuff means, but no operation. Iraqi freedom I thought that was weird is on march 19th um yeah, we started that.
Speaker 1:It was uh. The 18th of march is the first uh salvo, like when they tried to hit. That's when that uh stealth aircraft supposedly tried to hit Saddam's bunker and Ari Fleischer came out the next day and said that Operation Iraqi Liberation had begun. And somebody called the White House and said hey, you know, that spells oil right.
Speaker 2:I know that's a real story. Yeah, they had to change it.
Speaker 1:It's like Operation Iraqi Liberation has begun and somebody went back and just kind of doing notes and they're like, hey, it spells oil. You know, it's like during the Cuban Missile Crisis, when they're like Operation Ortsak or something. And then somebody goes, hey, you know, that spells Castro backwards, castro spells backwards.
Speaker 2:We're going to go go ortsat you know what that reminds me of? Because I re-watched this movie and I told you about it because I hadn't seen it since I was a kid. But burn after reading that that's exactly how, um you know, the cia and the intelligence agencies are represented in that movie.
Speaker 1:Just never like the useful idiots. Yeah, at the bottom, and then like just it's. You step back for a minute and you think about just how crazy this is now, like with with china and I. I don't try to be an alarmist, but I just study history and I don't understand like we have this. You know, I know that you're in taiwan and godspeed to you, sir. I know you live right next to me?
Speaker 2:Well, not for long. That's why I had that GoFundMe.
Speaker 1:He's got to get off the islands, kind of like Gilligan, we're going to get him, we're going to get him somewhere else, but we there's so much weirdness now that we've got tensions with China, even in the president of China the other day came out and said the US is just really wanting us to attack Taiwan, but before that, we're running. It's like we're using them in some like we build them up. You know, we give them. We just gave them our manufacturing. We gave them technology, or at least we'll give technology to the Israelis, who will sell it to the Chinese. They're really good at that. They like to take anything that we give them that's secret and then sell it to the Chinese.
Speaker 1:You can go look that up, by the way, if you need to folks. But are the Clintons' White after 9-11 to the Chinese? So it's like we build the Chinese up and we got the Wuhan lab and it's it's almost like you heard the term rendition for like tortured prisoners, for like tortured prisoners. You know this is something that happened during, you know, the, the, the GWAT, the, the global war on terror. It's like we take these people and then we turn them over to another agency where, where, you know, we kind of like Pontius Pilate we wash our hands of it and then they would go and torture them and figure out you know, that's.
Speaker 1:That's like what we've done. We like wash our hands. Francis Collins, is it that comes to mind? He was asked by Congress about the, the gain of function, and they've lied. This is just indisputable. Like Anthony Fauci's lied to this Congress. And Francis Collins, all these guys, they've lied. This is just indisputable, anthony.
Speaker 2:Fauci's lied to Congress. And Francis Collins, all these guys they've followed the bouncing ball that they saw everything that happened.
Speaker 2:I mean, Peter Daszak of EcoHealth was eventually blamed and they show again. They uncovered the information in 2018. He submitted a proposal to DARPA for a 14 million dollar grant, which was basically gain of function and making this virus to where it'd be transmissible to humans, and so they said they were focusing on human cleavage sites to do this. But, in any case, the funny thing about all this is DARPA rejected it. They said it was too risky. So guess who came in? Francis Collins and Anthony Fauci. And Anthony Fauci actually described it in a publication. He said I think I have a quote Yep, In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if the scientists become infected, talking about this type of research with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? So he hypothesized this during a publication that he submitted in 2012,. But eventually he said but the benefits outweigh the risks, so we're going to do it anyways. In what reality, do the benefits, what benefits outweigh the risks for messing with nature? I mean, there's there's no conceivable benefit. There is no benefit.
Speaker 1:There is no benefit, there is only risk. There is no benefit. I mean, you think about just an abomination, the things you're tinkering with and all they try to do the gain of function is to try to, like you're creating the ability for it to be more lethal, more infectious, survive longer. It to be more lethal, more infectious, survive longer, like that's what they do with these viruses. And again, even I get sucked into this, but I think that's more of a ruse. It's like they create this like boogeyman, like here's this guy escaping from a lab, you know, so there's a reason for the lockdown, you know we don't get to that. And ran paul doesn't get to that, or the the warp speed rollout or all that stuff that happened. We just kind of stick to the fact that there's a lab leak. You know, and I'm just I know that. That's that. I mean you and I can probably both deduce if there was anything that really was a thing, it was novel. Hawk 2 is Razor.
Speaker 2:Hawk 2 is Razor. Yeah, yeah, hawk 2 is.
Speaker 1:Razor. I'm going to start Hawk 2 is Razor.
Speaker 2:I'm sorry man, I don't know why that popped in my mind the other night, but I was like that's so stupid. Just try to sound smart.
Speaker 1:And you're just like, yeah, try to sound smart. And you're just like, yeah, you try to sound smart and you're a meme. It's like what I have feared has come to pass. The book of job, speaking of the bible, like, think about anthony fauci. Is it's really like the book of matthew when he talks about for what? As a man profited, you gain the whole world, but lose your soul. Soul, like what? What is his career? It's, it's his career.
Speaker 1:Anthony Fauci's career in medicine is a lot like Alan Dershowitz's career in law. Like Dershowitz supposed to be, like this, bulldog for the constitution and you know, a great attorney and a scholar. And at the end of all that, you know he's just basically standing up for pedos and you know, trying to fight for the lowering the age of consent, of course, you know, with sexual activity for minors. And then he talks about Dershowitz has put out there, he said, you know that he would argue in front of the Supreme Court the government's right to pick you off off the street, throw you in a room and jab a needle in your arm for the greater good of the health of the public.
Speaker 2:Man. In that respect, what transpired, like everything that happened, it was like the parting of the Red Sea, communist implication intended there. Implication intended there because you saw people that you thought you knew or were decent people saying I don't think, unless you get the vaccine, that you should have a hospital bed. You shouldn't get it into a hospital. It's like who are you?
Speaker 1:a gnome chomps. Yeah, it's like I thought you were libertarian everybody's favorite anti-war left, the linguist on the left, and it was like you know I always thought of as a man of peace and against totalitarian overreach. He's like well that those and I can go. I can find the clip I bet. I bet it's buried too. But noam chomsky came out and basically said people that didn't receive the could be like put in concentration camps fema.
Speaker 2:Yeah, you saw that all over and it didn't if anything. It did the opposite. It compelled me even less further to be interested in that because it's like no way it's going to be FDA approved and even if it is, so is AZT and also I don't care. I've known someone in particular who went to work for the FDA immediately after after grad school and getting a doctorate she had like one publication was one of the dimmest bulbs in school I've ever encountered. It's like those are the caliber of people working there. I just don't have any confidence in their ability to distinguish good from bad or things that are healthy for me and you shouldn't have to. I mean, where, where, where's where? All those people about hands off my body and stuff like that? Only if you're doing things from Moloch right On the altar of Moloch hands off my body, otherwise it's just. It was ridiculous. I don't.
Speaker 1:I don't know, man, it was a great leveling and I I think the the sad part is is now we're in election season and, like I said, it's like I feel as I'm saddened as an entrepreneur I'm missing out on so much because I can't get behind things, because I don't believe in them and I don't think they're real. It's kind of of like the election and the MAGA movement and all this and I wish it was real. But I look at it and I go guys, we just did this. I know we just did this and I was wanting a different way. You know, like, and everybody, people, rfk Jr disappointed me, even though, like you, researched his book. I mean, he wrote this book on Fauci. Let's talk about that. Let's talk. I mean, we got talk about Fauci and linked up with RFK Jr. What is his role in all of this? What's RFK Jr's role?
Speaker 2:I'm not really sure what his role is, but I mean he was so much against all these things that Fauci had done and what he saw, that Fauci rolled out during the pandemic. He wrote a book about it and you know, early on in the campaign trail I had a lot of hope for him. I mean I really like a lot about JFK. In fact the more I learn about him, the more I like him and the decision he made or rejected. But you know, I was listening to RFK Jr. It's like he's making some good points.
Speaker 2:He's like when I was a kid you just got three vaccinations right, you know, one's polio and these two others. He's like why are we vaccinating children against sexually transmitted diseases? How does that make any sense? Children against sexually transmitted diseases, how does that make any sense? And I think he mentioned something like suggested um, a shot total now is closer to 40. That's a lot of poison to give a little baby or a kid. So I mean obviously he didn't like fauci because he was not impressed by fauci either. Um, you just have to do a little bit of research, be a little bit curious and somewhat intelligent. You can say that this guy was just placed here because he's corrupt and he can be influenced any way you want him to be influenced, which is why he flip-flops so much Like.
Speaker 2:In the beginning he completely underplayed COVID and then it's two weeks to flatten the curve and then it's like oh, we just got to do that, we got to get under control and now we're going to roll out a vaccine. We just need herd immunity and we just need 50 percent of people to get the vaccine out. It needs to be 80. Just trying to get everybody to do it. But with RFK Jr, I mean, I haven't read that entire book, I've just read bits and pieces, but I liked it. I like the premise of it. I thought, ok, maybe I'll give you know, I'll lend my ear to RK Jr and what he's saying, even though I think we disagree on some things. But then he just sticks his head out for no reason on the abortion issue. It's like man, I just can't support you if that's how you are dude.
Speaker 1:You know, really weird. There's something really weird happened to his campaign right after he started talking about, right after he started talking about, and it had to do with gain of function, it had to do with his observation that was based in scientific observation. He was just reading, I think, white papers or other research into the fact that whatever COVID is seems to bypass, at least in lethality, asian people and Ashkenazi Jews.
Speaker 1:Yeah, yeah, you're right he mentioned that and then after that it was like I'm with Israel, like he just I mean, he backed off of that deal, but that-.
Speaker 2:I forgot about that, Tony. No way is that anti-semitic.
Speaker 1:That's like there's been published. It's true, it's a published work.
Speaker 2:I mean, no one got hit as hard, basically, as the us as far as casualties per capita are concerned. Nobody did. We did the lockdowns. China did considerably better, all the asian countries did and apparently the ashkenazi jews I mean, but I mean the great.
Speaker 1:So you, you could have called out. What he should have said was, like you know, it could have been better for the people of israel too, because it had netanyahu not been a just given over to pfizer, like this entire population, and said just run an experiment on these people with the vaccine. It's see, that's what I'm talking about. It's not the virus, it's not gain of function, it was the response. And the response was it's like, if you look at and I'll never forget this I went on InfoWars, it was October of 2020. We're nearing the last quarter of the year. I'll never forget it.
Speaker 1:And I said, hey, I just was live and I said I pulled up an article. I said I'm looking here at lewrockwellcom, an article by Bill Sardi, and Bill Sardi was a researcher and radio guy. He's passed away since then, but he was super smart and I remember just his articles were great. And he wrote an article and he said submitted without comment. And you know what the article was. It was the estimated total deaths in the US in 2020 were going to be within the margin of error will be the same as they were in 2019.
Speaker 2:Right.
Speaker 1:And he was like basically just submitted it without comment, so you read it. So I was like what is this? Like this is where because that was where I was I'm like now everybody's going to get to see at the end of the year that all of this was just this giant psyop, you know, and we're like everybody's dying and all this stuff. Now there was increasing deaths like suicide, suicide people that couldn't get treatment, people just like just despair and they die. I mean like they caused some death. But like overall, like where's the extra 400 000 people? Whatever they said, it wasn't there, but guess where it was in the next year, know, and that's where you get to the mid part of 2021. And those insurance CEOs, like One America it's a billion dollar life insurance company was like hey, we've seen a 200 year event in an increase in deaths between people of 18 to 64. Right, but they didn't see it in 2020.
Speaker 2:Yeah, right, well, there was a lot of fear mongering, right, there's that guy. What was his name? Neil Ferguson. He was an epidemiologist at Imperial College of London and he was the one that had that really crappy model and it predicted 2 million imminent deaths from this in the US.
Speaker 1:Fauci, yeah, fauci used that Him and Birx the two smart people. That's what Trump got. Trump said he got two smart people.
Speaker 2:So that was used to justify the lockdowns. And then it was revealed that that model was a buggy mess is what I remember it being quoted Something more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than some finely tuned piece of programming. And other researchers around the world, including those at the University of Edinburgh, couldn't recreate the results. Same input, same parameters, different result. That's a bad model. That's what they mean by buggy model.
Speaker 1:I mean, but all of it, all of it was clearly. I mean you have a timeline I could read off a few things. I looked up it was like a timeline of 2020 with Fauci and Trump.
Speaker 2:Right.
Speaker 1:But after the hospital, ships like the hospital ship Murphy off the coast of California, wasn't it? And then the New York had the army hospitals and all no patients.
Speaker 2:Yeah, 200 patients in a month and bon voyage.
Speaker 1:they left like it could completely overkill and just a bunch of fear-mongering they built like army hospital tents, giant ones, in like seattle and other places. Nobody nobody was there. I mean, why didn't they call the thing off? Right, that's so. That's what I'm talking about with this election year and everything else, and I'm supposed about with this election year and everything else, and I'm supposed to be excited and the deep state's going to be on the run now and I'm like, yeah, I've done this before. I hate to. I hate to be that guy, but I've literally just done this before and we're gonna just part two, I guess. But I wanted to read you something. This is why you were talking. I looked it up because I wanted to. I I always try to have attribution, ladies and gentlemen, whenever I have a memory and, by the way, this was like a Rolodex of like a way back. This was published in 2021. I remember this, and so I was talking about.
Speaker 2:Noam Chomsky, Literally his way back machine right.
Speaker 1:Yeah, tony's way back machine. Noam Chomsky says the unvaccinated should just remove themselves from society. How can we get food to them? He asked. Well, that's actually their problem. That's Noam Chomsky. Everybody revealed themselves and it's your fault if you still don't see people for what they are. The gift from God Almighty was like in this whole thing of of COVID 1984. And that's the way I say it, because that's what it is is you got to see who people really were. It's a huge gift. Take it for what it is. And I mean if, if you fall for the same people you know, um, feeding you the same lines.
Speaker 2:You know it's great about 1984 too, tony. It's the year Tony Fauci became director of the National Institute.
Speaker 1:I was just thinking of Van Halen. No it's a great album 1984, man. It's got the little kid smoking a cigarette.
Speaker 2:The good old days before the Marlboro man was going to sue him.
Speaker 1:Like you think the Marlboro. You think that cigarette's bad for you kid. Wait till you get vaccinated, and Fauci's here to make sure that you can't sue the company.
Speaker 2:Just wear your mask. Just wear your mask. It's good for you, it's good for you. The thing that got me about all this was how much cover he took. Underneath the guise of science, right Like on Face the Nation with Large Marge, or whatever her name was he just. He's so arrogant, he said when they aimed their bullets at Tony Fauci. He's talking in third person. It's like they might be attacking me, but they're attacking science. So everybody just started parroting that it's like you're not a scientist. Everybody just started parroting that it's like you're not a scientist. How would you know what he's saying is even true? Because it's not reminded me of all those people who join those fake facebook groups. Like I effing love science. It's like I hate that because? Because you love science. Why? Because you watch neil degrasse tyson imaginary asses on air.
Speaker 1:I mean, let me look up. I want to put up a quote from Neil deGrasse Tyson. I can't stand him.
Speaker 2:He hides all the giants, too, at the Smithsonian, or he did. That's why I hate him.
Speaker 1:He said something about consensus. There we go. Let me see if it'll pull it up.
Speaker 2:It's something he has a quote like the consensus is the science. Oh man, let me find it. Yeah, I mean, he, fauci, just said stuff like that. All the time, you know, these people are just lecturing us on the gravitas of science and how important it is and at the same time contradicting himself and making, um, you know, decisions, public policy decisions that aren't based on science, and he later says so and they're just branded noble lies and it's okay, it's like, well, they're not. No, they're lies, but they're not noble. It's just ridiculous.
Speaker 2:And the thing about the mask that always got me is everybody knew it was an aerosol, everybody knew it probably didn't matter if you covered your mouth because it could still enter into your body other ways, including your eyes, which is why I wore glasses a lot of the time. But the thing about it when you have viruses, that small people don't appreciate how long they can linger in the air I mean, for instance, in clean rooms where they do fabrication, microprocessors and things like that, they have a thing called laminar flow, vertical laminar flow that pushes all those particles, all those particulates down so they don't get on your devices and ruin them because they'll just linger for eight hours. So I was, you know, three years ago, four years ago, like looking at all this going. This just doesn't make any sense. I mean, you, just I. I took refuge in what you said, tony is it probably is made from china, but, like all other things, made in china, that was that's an old tony quote.
Speaker 1:It's made in china, but like everything else, it's just broken, doesn't work just get it and get it over with just kidding. I remember you, if you remember, uh, the early days of the scandemic and I, uh, this was like mid part of the 2020, and then I, I come over to see you and, uh, I just sit out, like whenever I get excited and you were.
Speaker 2:You're on the porch with me. Yeah, I said, tony, I have it, and you're like I'll just get some sunshine.
Speaker 1:I just fit in the sunshine with my shirt off.
Speaker 2:I'll be fine you didn't get it, it's because your anthrax vaccine just, oh, that's what I said.
Speaker 1:Another, my anthrax vaccine will eat it. There's no, my anthrax vaccine will eat it right up. Uh, yeah, this Neil deGrasse Tyson this is a quote, it's like. He emphasizes the importance of a scientific consensus, stating that when scientists disagree, it's due to insufficient data and the solution lies in gathering more data to solve the problem. He believes that scientific truths emerge from observation and measurements, rendering research outside of consensus as shaky grounds. Because that we all know that science is consensus, right, yeah, because that's when the majority of people agree. See, that's, that's the that, just in that mode of thought, is so outside of what everything history teaches us.
Speaker 2:Yeah, he went after Tesla one time and he was just like, well, he did a lot of good stuff, but he was a wackadoodle, you know. Basically because he had basically how he described him. He said he did some good stuff but he was completely crazy about other things, you know, the things that they didn't make or they didn't try to make money.
Speaker 1:Boy, you know the things that they didn't make or they didn't try to make money on, boy, you know, and we don't have any Teslas around. If they do, they've been shut down. We know we just did that last pair of trends around forbidden tech, but it's been shut down. The people that rise to the top, the Fauci's and you know speaking of that and going back a little bit before we close with with Kerry Mullis, yeah, it's a fascinating life and, like if you were talking to this man, you know, the inventor of the PCR test and so many other things was an interesting guy. Obviously had a heart for the truth and research and innovation and breakthrough. Wasn't afraid to back up and innovation and breakthrough wasn't afraid to back up. You can just tell, like that interview, he would have loved to have just gone toe-to-toe with anybody, especially Anthony Fauci, but the Fauci's are rewarded and, by the way, cary Mullis had to conveniently die in August of 2019. Right, right, he was 74, died of pneumonia supposedly.
Speaker 2:It's the polymerase chain reaction. What are the odds of all these things lining up? Just so? I mean, can you imagine how vocal he would have been, especially about the testing?
Speaker 1:That is the, to me, one of the big red flags. But 2019, there was so many things going on, like, if you just go back and look at it, you know and I have the ability to like hindsight I remember so many things happening and all my spidey senses were, you know, going off the. That's one that I, that's why I moved Like I moved my business. I'm like there's something wrong with something wrong. Like I kept saying like you know, that's when I moved and got a place in the Ozarks and got my land up there and and moved to to Branson, for you know, from San Antonio, I really felt like there was something up.
Speaker 2:Yeah, I remember you said I just feel it.
Speaker 2:The other thing that happened that year, if you recall, that was the year they made a big deal about all the vaping, the child vaping, getting sick from it.
Speaker 2:And I spoke with somebody who is an ER doctor in Taiwan, where I live, and they were convinced I don't think we have the same politics at all, but convinced that they got it in the summer COVID that it was already here Because he basically performed some treatment for some kids who got that and came to the hospital and their parents were highly suspicious of them vaping. They said I promise I haven't been vaping. And then somebody he worked with got it. And then two days later, I mean I think I haven't been vaping. And then somebody who worked with got it and then two days later I mean I think he was wearing a Fitbit or something and his heart rate was just through the roof and he went in the same thing he had some inflammation in his lung, he got scans done. So it was all this stuff. It makes sense in hindsight. I'm not saying necessarily that's what happened, but it does line up because what happened to all the that, the outcry about child vaping or teenager vaping and don't forget.
Speaker 1:Don't forget things like 5g and other things that were introduced it it just there's something deeper here and it's deeper than wuhan. It's deeper than fauci. We covered fauci, but he's figurehead. It's almost like he is the gain of function. That's what he is. He's a deep state gain of function for their own protocols, for what they are rolling out and infecting all of us. I mean, it's a wider issue.
Speaker 2:And I think everybody should be on point when it comes to this bird flu stuff. I mean, he was chickle chickle chicken littling that in 2005 and they're doing it again. It's like we found it in 2009 h1n1.
Speaker 2:Yeah, cheryl atkinson was like a cbs investigative journalist and she she pressed the cd, cdc on why they abruptly stopped testing and they wouldn't release information as to why. So she started contacting state labs like all 50, you know, kudos to her and she found out that all the people who were compelled to be tested throughout all the states, like over 90 percent of them, were testing negative for H1N1. Because, again, it was just bad testing. And I think there was a German physician and politician what was his name? Wolfgang something but he called it like the greatest medical scandal of the century, h1n1. Because they were just pushing vaccines for profit. It was obvious and there was no consequence for it. So, again, why would they stop doing it? They just did it again.
Speaker 1:I mean, he said this medical scandal of the century with regard to h1n1 and kobe's, like, hold my beer right, it's of all time. Yeah, we go back to the 70s. They did this in the mid 70s with uh, with swine flu, and uh rolled it rolled out a big, you know, push for a vaccine that a lot of people got hurt and then they stopped that. They stopped it real quick. But that's you know push for vaccine that a lot of people got hurt and then they stopped that. They stopped it real quick. But that's why, you know, something was wrong, like the only solution.
Speaker 1:I remember going back and I saw a clip from my show come across my feed on Facebook. It was like, you know, remember this from four years ago. So I pressed play. This was a while back and it was like it was back in April and it was those four years old. It was like, and it was, you know, me talking in April of 2020 about what this was about.
Speaker 1:I'm like all of this is leading up to do a vaccine. There'll be no other solutions, you can't take anything else, and I'm like it's all going to be a push for a vaccine. So you get the vaccine. That's their solution. Their solution is to give you this thing that they've got to have and you've got to have it, or you can't get better and nothing else will work. And I go. Then they'll tell you that if you don't have your vaccine, then my vaccine doesn't work. That's what they're going to tell you. And I was like I was thinking, I was like, thanks, four years ago, tony, you really did know a couple of things. And then I look back on, it seems like a totally different world. Here's something I want to read to you I like zone, yeah, go ahead uh views on uh climate change from carrie mullis.
Speaker 1:In his 1998 autobiography, mullis expressed disagreement with the scientific evidence for humans role in climate change and ozone depletion. Mullis claimed that scientific theories about ozone depletion and climate change were the product of scientists and government bureaucrats conspiring to secure funding. Well, they didn't like him, you know. I can promise you that. He also spoke out on AIDS. Yep you know he said that AIDS is an arbitrary diagnosis when HIV antibodies were found in a patient's blood. Basically, the whole foundation of what they claim AIDS is.
Speaker 2:Right, there's a lot of that now too. It's just so weird. That whole period was so bizarre. I remember um family just told me, like my father's by far the most bizarre thing he's ever experienced in his life, and I remember thinking about it. I was like, is this it? And then you like we were talking about the 666 000. It seems like they were trying to make it it. But I remember coming across a story too around this time I remember is the spring and I think before, no, just after lockdown. But um, you know the angel moroni from um mormon church, yeah, yeah, so the their biggest church is in salt lake city, and around that time the angel moroni's trumpet on that church fell to the ground. There was an earthquake and it fell and I was like, okay, that seems very symbolic. I mean, you're talking about the trumpets and revelation, everything like that. So my eyes were huge. I was like what is going on?
Speaker 1:I think one of the most underrated, weirdest stories of all of this time was something that I was one of the first people to talk about, and then it just went away. And it's real Microsoft, bill Gates, has a patent on a biometric integrated cryptocurrency system where you would put in your body and it would reward you for quote approved activities. I'm putting this in quotation, and so it's a cryptocurrency biometric system that will reward you for approved activities, and the patent is World Patent 060606.
Speaker 2:I remember you telling me that.
Speaker 1:And I found it.
Speaker 2:I mean not that I was questioning you, but that's a real thing. And why?
Speaker 1:isn't that I find? I find like a lot of things that I'll cover over the years. I'm like I, this is insane and then, like you almost hear nothing of it's like, but that that should tell you everything. Isn't that weird. Like, why isn't that on? You know that people don't think that's weird. I, I, you know, like if you're a normie I guess you just can't look at it. But I'm like, literally they're telegraphing.
Speaker 1:Whether they believe it or not, you know they want you to believe it like there's something to the, this whole cabal of strangeness and these front men because fauci's a front man for the deep state or whatever that is, and Bill Gates is a front man for international banking cartels and dynasties that people you don't see, people that look like Mr Burns from the Simpsons or you know, like they can't get into the sun, but that it's. It was a strange time and it's getting weirder, but it's. We definitely, we definitely are. You know, once we crossed over from it's funny kind of quaint looking back into 2019 and thinking about that timeline and yeah, it's, I don't know how it's gonna, how we're going to be impacted with this new election cycle.
Speaker 2:It's, it's weird. I mean when I was, I couldn't watch the debate. I just don't care enough at this point. I mean I'm not excited about either candidate, obviously, but just the, the little clips. I did watch Biden. It reminded me of like multiplicity. It's like, oh no, they brought the copy of the copy out. It's just so ridiculous. And then Trump, you know he's saying he's going to do all the things that he already promised to do the first time there, you know.
Speaker 1:I just feel like I'm stuck in some weird time loop and I'm glad that we put this one down for all time. So this will be, I think, episode number Paratruther, number 24, if I'm not mistaken. Let me make sure real quick before I put my mark on that. But yeah, you can find us, ladies and gentlemen, anywhere podcasts are served up. Be sure and follow us I have two feeds, paratruther and the orderburn radio transmission and give us a review if you're so inclined. Uh, really does help us with the algorithms. They try to. They tuck this away. Uh, this show, and it's funny like it's been around for years and you can tell like they're just not really happy with it. Uh, yeah, it's episode 24. I was right about that. Uh, of paratrooper and um, uh, thank you, mr anderson, for for joining uh the the stream today and uh, all your research. I appreciate you, sir oh, yeah, always.
Speaker 2:Thank you, tony, I love doing the shows with you yeah, we'll be back soon.
Speaker 1:we got got some more stuff planned, but I definitely wanted to drop something here before the 4th of July. We've got a lot the industry and turned everything on its head. I'm really proud of that. I did something totally different than what the industry normally does, and that's chase after the big bucks. We went after normal people. So turn some of your soon-to-be worthless fiat currency, as my friend Charlie Robinson said, into actual money, and you can do that with Wolfpack Silver, uh, silver and gold and um, all kinds of great variety too. So go check out wolfpackgold if you want to support the show, and we'll be back soon. You guys have a great 4th of July. Take care of each other, and then the information war. Be a pair of truth, see you next.