Litigator Libations
Updates and tips on defensive litigation in military justice including discussing recent appellate decisions and providing advocacy tips.
Litigator Libations
64 - US v. Rocha and Breaking Down the Charges
•
Darrel-the-DCAP
•
Season 3
•
Episode 64
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
In this episode we discuss the recent case of United States v. Rocha, where the CAAF reversed the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, which found that the enumerated Article 134 offense of Indecent Conduct, did not put Airman Rocha on notice that masturbating with a sex doll with childlike characteristics was a crime. CAAF says it did. We then hear from Lt Col Allen Abrams who provides a six step analysis on how defenders can analyze and attack the specification drafted by the government.
United States v. Rocha
Breaking Down the Specification
Outro