The Scope of Things
Episode: 28 - Jonathan Kimmelman on Research Ethics and Dilemmas in Clinical Trials
In this month’s episode of the Scope of Things, host Deborah Borfitz gives you the latest news on the fallacy of a survival benefit for cancer patients participating in clinical trials, how and why federally qualified health centers are getting involved in studies, efforts to disrupt the current practice of excluding pregnant and lactating women from participation, great news about the impact of precision medicine on the outcomes of kids suffering from aggressive cancers, and more. Jonathan Kimmelman, PhD, Professor of Biomedical Ethics at McGill University, also joins Deborah to discuss current dilemmas in clinical development and how research standards are trending. Kimmelman talks about the ethical implications when trial sponsors don’t fully disclose how patient input is utilized in drug development, key policies that are necessary and would have a big impact on regulators, and what would-be participants can do to be more informed about trials.
In this month’s episode of the Scope of Things, host Deborah Borfitz gives you the latest news on the fallacy of a survival benefit for cancer patients participating in clinical trials, how and why federally qualified health centers are getting involved in studies, efforts to disrupt the current practice of excluding pregnant and lactating women from participation, great news about the impact of precision medicine on the outcomes of kids suffering from aggressive cancers, and more. Jonathan Kimmelman, PhD, Professor of Biomedical Ethics at McGill University, also joins Deborah to discuss current dilemmas in clinical development and how research standards are trending. Kimmelman talks about the ethical implications when trial sponsors don’t fully disclose how patient input is utilized in drug development, key policies that are necessary and would have a big impact on regulators, and what would-be participants can do to be more informed about trials.