Wrack Your Brain Episode 6

#podcast  #politics #Veterans #twoidiots #BAFTA #Burisma #Presidents #Radicalright #RadicalLeft

Episode 6. This is a show about everything and nothing. Part politics, part satire, all bourbon. Join Dominick Leon and Charles Fuks as they muse about current events, social issues, and whatever surfaces from the depths of their minds. If you walk away thinking about something in a different way leave a comment, like, share, and subscribe. In this episode we discuss many things including BAFTA Awards, Legitimizing Despots, and Burisma.

Music sourced from https://pixabay.com/

Background music is "Indie Folk (King Around Here)" by Alex Grohl

Check out the accompanying video on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0HtdjwJIFY

Transcript

0:30

all right welcome back everybody to another episode of rack your brain i'm your host dominic leon and my other host charles

0:36

fuchs and today is wednesday march 22nd march 22nd

0:44

all right no it's not much it's tuesday tuesday

0:49

we don't drink okay so uh i believe we promised our loyal

0:57

and patient and uh informed viewers last week were android listeners this is a possible podcast afro that uh that we

1:04

were going to do a a response to uh to video not that this this

1:10

particular uh i don't know three minute clip it is any more meaningful or

1:15

matters anymore than anything else uh nor do i think it necessarily has triggered any sort of uh reaction in us

1:23

more than anything else but we did find this one uh last week and and to be transparent we didn't want to look for

1:29

another one so we had this ready to go so we'll uh play some clips respond to it remember

1:35

we can't play the whole thing because of the copyright thing so we can move oh playing videos on other things

1:41

they'll copyright they'll take us down that's why that's why morgan doesn't deal with on his place really oh yeah

1:46

yeah he'll play without sound and play like a two second thing of it just to see you

1:52

see what it is but he'll play without sound yeah yeah it's because of the copyright thing yeah but i've seen

1:58

videos of people responding to other videos before because he's got permission or it's the person he's interviewing

2:04

it's their own it's their own video no i don't mean rogan video because i've really never seen him but

2:10

um yeah uh sponsors if you're listening

2:16

okay so use on it every day but uh no i don't mean hit his i mean uh

2:23

just other clips like i've seen i don't know tick tock videos where people have green screen and they're responding oh yeah but that's tic tac

2:30

i'm saying as far as on a podcast they you know they have um i think we're gonna edit all this out

2:35

we're going to start again why i don't know just boring our listeners with semantics i

2:41

don't think it's any more boring than the hunting hunting camping video we did that when we took a break from

2:46

from real real world [ __ ] not that hunting and camping is a real world but uh let's uh here why don't you uh

2:54

tell the listeners uh something from the deepest darkest depths of your mind while i while i confirm whether or not

2:59

we can actually share a clip okay ladies and gentlemen something from the deepest darkest

3:05

depths of my mind the dark web is real all right dark web is real don't go on

3:12

it but you don't know everybody knows knows it exists but nobody knows what's on it

3:19

and i'm just one of the the momos who was dumb enough to go on there and

3:24

see what was what just because i was curious and it's not nice and it's not good

3:31

don't ever do it you don't know what you're going to see and you don't want to see it

3:39

can i show clips of youtube videos on youtube i don't know youtube tell us

3:47

because there's a video youtube video about copyright rules on youtube

3:53

here we go okay how to use news clips in youtube videos and this one wasn't which goes why don't we just play the video

4:00

for ourselves and respond to it and we'll deal with that on our own time

4:05

i mean let's not waste our podcast listeners and our viewers time with our own

4:11

details that's just the response i think our our listeners and viewers mostly uh

4:16

tune in for for the gun show but um you know

4:22

anything grunt style over there run style sponsor now this is just we're going to

4:29

spend the next 45 minutes just asking different people to sponsor us okay um okay how to channel hold on

4:36

you can you can't use unlicensed news clips in your video without risking demonetization copyright strikes or

4:42

legal disputes with the creator you need to purchase a license for the clip oh my god that's okay so we're not doing that

4:48

that's but we can play it for ourselves and we can tell you what it's about as we discuss it

4:54

now what the video that we're talking about that we were constantly trying to figure out is there is a journalist from

5:00

england i'm assuming it's from england uh that is talking about the the award

5:06

winners at the baptist now this uh particular journalist is talking

5:11

about the privileged class of actors who you know wanted to i guess make

5:18

well let's play some for ourselves for us go ahead you play it um and you listen to it and then that's

5:24

right so we're gonna have to pause okay yeah so uh we'll be right back all right so

5:30

first i don't know 15 seconds no no don't do that because the pause come back pause yeah that's what

5:35

we're gonna do yeah cause what we're gonna do all righty that's that's the least part of today look at the editor

5:41

i'm just the body i know this is this is more work for me okay so he's just the pretty face he's

5:47

normal candy i'm the brains of that person all right so okay so the cheap date in the in the

5:54

first 15 seconds i don't know you're not that cheap i made it i made a ribeye steak for you in the woods once i made

6:00

two ribeye steaks for you delicious they were they were and they were dry aged ribeye sticks and he made

6:06

me uh what is it a oatmeal potatoes oh god uh biscuits oh my gosh

6:12

cast iron biscuits i just want to go camping again

6:20

so this clip right so this guy starts off he he he or she i don't know i don't wanna i don't wanna identify this person

6:27

in case there's a copyright claim so it's it's a guy it's a person and um

6:32

it was saying that that uh the the uh attendees of this of

6:38

this bafta event charlotte indiegogo charlatans overeducated over privileged

6:45

uh he was saying how how they they they ridiculed donald trump for for his years

6:51

in office and they they they called for biden they they advocated for but they just wanted them even

6:58

some of them may have campaigned for them so he he's he's already accusing people of

7:06

of not accusing people he's already diminishing their

7:12

whatever it is that they said whatever their perspective is because they they supposedly they

7:17

looping looping an entire group of people into one into one is always a smart idea right um

7:24

because everybody's the same when they belong to a particular demographic or identity

7:30

but to your point i mean to that point but didn't they though isn't it common knowledge and couldn't we can we

7:36

research whether they did or not we absolutely can and without without doubting i agree with you he is kind of

7:42

generalizing and looping them all into into one thing but at the same time the major i would say that the majority of

7:48

the people he's talking about we could research it and and find out that yes indeed they

7:54

pretty much not all of them i wouldn't say all of them but most of them are doing or did exactly what he said they

7:59

did i think that that he's

8:04

his 50 000 foot view and description really really overlooks a lot of things

8:10

so first of all let's let's look at some some some specific generalizations that are

8:17

at least more accepted right one orange men good one one act

8:23

one actors uh generally are left-leaning right both in the uk and the us

8:29

generally yeah meaning the most most of them yeah yeah okay um

8:34

yeah a lot of them probably were outspoken against donald trump both both the u.s and and uh

8:41

um you can i would say british and i'll be honest i i like many people

8:46

get confused between the differences between britain england united kingdom and

8:51

i think uk is england scotland ireland right so i i

8:57

this guy was was in in england so let's just call him british whatever it doesn't matter

9:03

so um so yeah yeah american american and british actors

9:09

left-leaning and and outspoken against donald trump i think this person takes a leap of

9:14

faith not a leap of faith he takes a logical leap when he then goes on to say or he

9:20

or she goes on to say um they openly called for and i'm maybe i'm

9:26

paraphrasing openly called for for joe biden well okay stop

9:31

president is there for four years and they might have been ridiculing them for four years

9:37

there wasn't there were some voices talking about 2020 and biden but there were many voices calling for all kinds

9:45

of people to run as as democrats uh in in 2020 right during there that's even prior to the problem that's

9:51

it right so are you saying in 2016 suddenly you know donald trump is sworn in and these

9:56

british actors are like we didn't bite in here nobody i mean it's not that nobody cared about biden it's just that

10:01

he hadn't even announced that he might run i don't think anybody had announced at that point that they were going to run there might have been some assumptions and contenders right bottom

10:09

line is a certain amount of time passed before anybody was was campaigning for biden

10:15

even at the time of the primary there were plenty of contenders right there was uh pete budaj

10:21

and and chelsea chelsea gabbard right and the other um the other thing which is senator

10:27

congressman also veteran i think i'm thinking of

10:39

maybe she's not a veteran but uh she's a senator klobuchar amy klobuchar but i don't know

10:57

isn't there another veteran from hawaii that's also in congress isn't tammy duckworth also from okay whatever neither here nor there

11:04

so okay so even the primaries which which what started what two years before the election-ish 2018

11:10

maybe 20 let's just say 2019 right so primaries happen there there were people running running for for for

11:18

the democratic nomination uh even before even before biden biden made his announcement so were these were

11:25

the the bafta people were they were they openly calling for biden by and large probably not right so

11:31

i say all this to to to point out that this guy is making generalities and he's already making logical leaps

11:38

in the first 15 seconds and he also sounds like an angry prick so but i mean that's that's a subjective

11:44

thing all right so are we ready are you gonna no i couldn't find it but go ahead i'm ready what if she was about here i

11:49

really didn't look that hard it helps if you can read okay so uh we

11:55

will be right back we we have to we have to we have to respond to that part i i don't think there's there's any way

12:02

any other way of putting this he basically said that ukraine would not by the way the entire videos aside from

12:07

from being a heavy critique of of left-leaning uh uh

12:13

actors and actresses is um is is a pretty much about ukraine and

12:18

their stance on ukraine so in in the next what five seconds the last five seconds we listened to uh he he

12:25

basically made the claim that that uh ukraine would not have been invaded had had donald trump still been president

12:33

go on i mean

12:40

would have been invaded though i don't know i don't think so i don't think so

12:45

okay uh but that's just my opinion listen who knows no one no one can think for vladimir putin he's gonna do

12:50

whatever he was going to do and i think if this was in his if this was in his real house to do for

12:56

a while who knows if if he would have done it or not just because of who's in the white house in america if that's

13:02

what he was going to do who's really going to stop him don't i think the only thing that would have changed

13:08

would have been possibly how the united states reacted to it that's that's about it

13:14

maybe but i i mean correct me if i'm wrong and let me add to that i'm just going to say one thing for as much as a trump

13:21

supporter as i am and i'm a republican i also will say though you know what your criticism has to go

13:28

you know where it where it belongs and if i can criticize donald trump on a few things is that maybe

13:34

if he was still president and this would have happened who knows what he would have said that could have possibly even made a

13:41

thing made it made things worse we don't know i mean we we have some we have some historical president uh when

13:48

when he had a uh a twitter a twitter fight with uh kim jong kim jungkoon yeah

13:54

but then what happened with that they became besties shook hands and everything kim jong-un invited invited

14:00

him over for dinner okay but what happened before that they were having a childish twitter war

14:05

didn't matter he went over to north korea he crossed and well dmz crosstalk

14:11

it matters in the sense that during the time of that twitter war north korea and this is in fact

14:17

checkmate north korea escalated their their i don't know their posture everyone put

14:24

it they they did they did i don't know if they increased their test but they had some prominent missile tests they

14:30

were basically it was a show of force that they had prior to

14:35

however it is it was mended and then he went to the dmz oh by the way i actually recently re-watched that

14:42

clip um where where he i think he stepped over the dmz he was the first person

14:49

yeah no he was in the dmc no no i think he stepped into north korea yeah they met in the dmz and then

14:56

and then and then he stepped into korea first and only president is that notable

15:02

i mean certainly people have argued that that's like an example of trump diplomacy and how

15:09

blah blah blah at the same time though there were a lot of arguments at the time as a matter of

15:14

fact i think i might have been in in my first deployment and i was doing information operations

15:21

for the army and so uh so i was like well versed in this and i think it was that same year or at least

15:28

shortly after where where he crossed over and a lot of people in that community were like

15:33

that's a win for kim jong-un because and i don't know if this was ever confirmed but you better bet that like

15:39

he was blasting all over their media like oh my god look what i've done i've brought an american president here look

15:45

how great i am like we've we essentially legitimized and you remember this from

15:50

from iraq and afghanistan's whole idea of legitimizing the government right so he legitimized a a

15:58

and this this is a tough word to say totalitarian regime right he he he in fact legitimized the disciples

16:04

on their state-run television they're just going to probably show that clip over and over again and

16:10

they're going to say that's what our our leader did he he did this and in the end what what was actually accomplished from

16:16

that from that from the photo op that was much more valuable for the north koreans

16:22

do they still have have nuclear weapons it served its purpose for the short time that it actually was effective but i

16:28

mean as a photo pretty much you know and it kind of calmed things down for a little bit a lot of people like to say oh it it um

16:36

you know it stopped the war well i mean was the war imminent with north korea though i don't know

16:42

because these these scare tactics more than yeah not not more than anything right because north korea has been

16:47

playing the same game for a very long time missile testing shooting missiles you know towards guam and all this you

16:53

know it's not like this is the first time and i think they just probably took the situation

16:59

and uh just said hey you know if we really run with this we can make something out of it and make something big

17:05

whether or not it's going to last long i think was irrelevant at the time they just wanted it to see they wanted people

17:11

to see like hey look at what we can do now do i believe you that it really 100 i think

17:17

that in north korea this served a purpose to legitimize that that regime

17:22

um did it look good on this end sure it did but i don't know that it looked as well people that wanted it wanted to see

17:30

it as looking good perhaps i mean you know yeah maybe there was some good that we saw in

17:36

it or and you know and but i agree it could have looked great to people who wanted it to look great but if anybody

17:42

was a a real winner in all this it was definitely kim jong-un and the north

17:47

korean regime yeah yeah internally because they could just play that over their state-run

17:53

television and you know now their leader looks like a hero so

17:58

so anyway we we we're really the topic is whether or not donald trump would have prevented the invasion of ukraine

18:04

so you're you're the most you know you're you're right in in saying that

18:11

that who know a who knows what what putin would have done b i think i think you you basically

18:17

partially said it is that he he's probably been planning this for a while i mean the the fact the fact that

18:22

i mean he's for the last 12 years like even going back to 2008 i think was was uh was crimea right so the

18:30

last 14 years he he has been implementing what he's been very open about as his desire to

18:38

make it's just not it's not just 14 years people that i also remember before putin was even

18:44

thought of as being any kind of leader in russia this guy's former kgb this guy's former he was in the in the soviet

18:51

union before the iron curtain fell so he knew what it was like to be in the communist uh era of of russia when it

18:59

wasn't even it was the soviet union and he knew what it was like back then he also saw the fall of the iron curtain he

19:04

saw all that stuff and he's not ever been shy about talking about how i guess in his mind he thought

19:11

things were better as they were prior to communist communism falling in russia

19:17

and i think with certain movements and certain things he's done over the years

19:23

especially when it came to crimea and it was at the the dumbass region and all that the invasion of georgia you know

19:30

they invaded but they orchestrated i think the revolution there same thing i think they orchestrated in belarus

19:36

so yes a lot of these things have been very very detailed and not

19:43

he's been marinating over this for a while and he's i guarantee you he's been gathering intel for a very long time and

19:49

then just picked his spot and he picked is the best time to do it whether or not we think this was the best time is

19:54

irrelevant because we're not in his in his office we don't know what's on his mind he might have thought that this was

20:00

the best time regardless of who was in the white house well the a and he he might have also and

20:07

there's there's a lot of talk about this so one irrespective of who's in the white house

20:12

or sorry like irrespective of what of what uh impediments there would be from

20:18

the west including who's in the white house in the u.s but also he he might have seen this as like a critical critical

20:24

point because because of how close uh possibly uh ukraine was getting to to be

20:30

admitted to nato right so maybe he's like [ __ ] i i only have this small you know window of time when when when

20:36

they're still not nato and i can attack them without without uh see that's another thing that sounds like a conversation and with the whole

20:42

thing with nato whether or not a part of me wants to say that whether or not

20:48

um ukraine was with nato is would have impeded you know pollutant and making the decision to go into a ukraine right

20:55

or we're not i don't think i'm saying if the ukraine were a member of nato i don't think it would have impeded him

21:01

absolutely because i think he's more concerned with loss of control i think he wants to maintain i think the

21:08

ukrainian government had a level of of some kind of subservience to the

21:14

russian government even though they wanted to maintain their distance from them well for for i mean certainly under

21:19

the soviet union then they were then they were there was more move of them being more aligned to the west and then i think in the early 2000s uh

21:27

close to russia and then since since actually since 2014 just prior to zolinski and into the zielinski time

21:33

right now my thing was even though in my opinion if he didn't care whether

21:39

it wasn't about whether they joined nato or not there is a slight um

21:44

level of importance of them joining nato because in his mind if the ukraine if ukraine joins nato what's to stop the

21:51

nato from parking their weapons in the ukraine you know and uh i mean sure i think that

21:58

is part of it it's a small part of it but at the same time though like but the more the more i think ukraine

22:05

tries to consider or at least gain some kind of a foothold into western

22:10

um alliances i think putin feels like he's losing control over a certain area

22:16

it's not even losing control he wants to maintain a certain level of control of what's around him well he certainly does

22:22

want russian sphere of influence to be as big as possible even as big as it was during during the

22:27

the soviet union right the so but that i guess the flip side slash

22:33

slash another element to that is aside from russian sphere of influence

22:40

and it's tough to separate this right but but aside from that his concern is how close

22:47

nato as a as an organization is to russia and so you can't get closer than the

22:53

border of russia if if ukraine gets becomes part of nato but certainly and he's he's

22:58

he's he's talked about it and don't forget um where is that is it's moldova

23:04

because he's got pretty much half of moldova already no he's not mulder although it was on the western side of

23:10

ukraine it's um he's got about 500 000 soldiers in moldova right now

23:16

that they've been there belarus maldov world wherever

23:34

i don't care where it's on the map i want you to fact check the information i will but first i have to i want you to

23:39

understand mobile is here i understand that but now are they but are are there

23:44

russians in moldova have russians and turd

23:51

that wasn't what i asked you are there russians in moldova not have they entered are there any russians in moldova right now as we speak

23:58

even russian military yeah yes russian military

24:05

in mall dota 100

24:10

confidence is not

24:21

partially i'm going to give you partial the russian federation holds an unknown

24:26

soldiers in trans transnistria transnistria

24:33

an unrecognized breakaway state internationally recognized as part of moldova

24:39

and it's been there since 1992. so you know and the numbers the intel

24:45

numbers on how many it is it's around 500 000. because they're split up into separate camps kind of like 500 000

24:53

russian soldiers no again no how many you know that for a fact do you just disagree with me no no

24:59

i could i could tell you with certainty not fact because that just came out today from military intelligence and you

25:05

can look that up because they're trying to figure out the russian military doesn't even have 500

25:10

000 soldiers period period and then so how are there so we were responding

25:16

to this bafta video but we've somehow kind of well this is what happens this is what happens what usually happens

25:22

well we'll get back to i mean we might get back to the video no i'm probably spitting out 500 000 but this could be

25:27

soldiers mixing with civilians who work for the russian military kind of like a military they barely scrounge together i

25:34

understand what you're saying do you understand what you're saying i completely understand why they'd have a million they'd be in ukraine and i'm not

25:40

disagreeing with you yes actually wait a minute hold on hold on i think my number wait now that i remember it could be 50

25:47

000 that's a lot more reasonable than 500 i actually think it is around there because they were talking about how many

25:52

p how many soldiers would it take to take over moldova and they said well if we had five hundred thousand soldiers we

25:59

could possibly begin but we don't even have yeah right so that is a huge difference okay two days ago uh this is

26:06

but i was right they are in moldova they they they are right but but you said they weren't 100

26:11

you said 100 they're not just admit you were wrong

26:16

i'll give you partial credit and here's why well one marginal credit you get the partial credit because there are russian

26:22

soldiers in moldova was i wrong on the numbers sure but but the question was like

26:28

or did you not imply that it was like part of the recent you know

26:33

i said there was no no that's how you took it and that's why when you looked at it and i saw what you were text

26:39

looking i said that's not what i asked you you said that they entered i said that's not what i said i said they're

26:45

already there it had nothing to do with who was entering what i said they're in moldova

26:50

right and you said have they entered moldova 1500 troops could be 15 1500 not 500

26:58

000. i think the 500 no with the 500 all right from sure okay that number came from i

27:04

think it was a conversation with putin saying if we were to take over moldova how many soldiers would we need and i think he estimated it to be around 500

27:11

000 but they're they don't even have that many troops right but i mean that's i think that's where my number was i confused it but again they don't even

27:18

have but are they there which was the initial question yes they are okay

27:25

and what was the point oh okay so so putin's motivation so the one last thing

27:32

i'm going to say about that is that is that he has like he's it's not that he's admitted he

27:38

he is concerned about nato but but he is openly aware is how i'll put it this and everything that i've

27:45

seen on it i don't think many people would disagree is that is that um he is he is aware of how solid

27:52

the article five is of nato like he absolutely knows there's no doubt in his mind that every country in nato is

27:59

committed if one is attacked they are all going to war with whoever it is that attack them and so he understands that

28:06

and and he absolutely the the timing of this especially with with recent talks

28:12

of of ukraine jordan nato the timing is is tied to that but one of the what let

28:17

me ask you what are the i i and i agree with you 100 but now what are the odds that ukraine

28:23

would be joining nato at all like what are the chances of that happening not zero and i don't think

28:29

they're low either it's not zero but it's not exactly high if anything they have a 50 50 shot and that's being

28:34

generous sure maybe 50 50 times that's being generous it's and i think

28:41

that's partially because because of or at least in part

28:47

maybe i'm wrong maybe maybe maybe i'm confusing they're them being admitted to the eu with them being admitted to nato

28:53

but there are there are there are stipulations right and i believe one of them is like the stability

29:01

of of a democracy in other words like the the recent and when i say recently within

29:07

the last 10 years and probably more recently less so supposedly uh uh the history of of um of

29:16

corruption in in the ukrainian government i believe is is one at least one of the things that's

29:22

uh that they have been asked to work on before being admitted to nano and so there were

29:27

that's what they um that's what um president trump said he said it with zielinski's like they're gonna have to

29:32

really work on this corrupt system and zielinski actually had a look on his face like he didn't know what trump was talking about but

29:39

it listen uh a deaf mute with no hands can look up how you know corrupt ukraine is it

29:46

it doesn't make a difference every i think it's global knowledge at this point how corrupt that country is well

29:51

so i think the only people who don't want to admit that ukraine is corrupt is

29:56

ukrainians i don't think that's i don't think that's true i mean and i don't know a lot about ukrainian

30:03

politics but my understanding is that he was elected at least on par at least in part on a platform of ending corruption

30:10

westernizing and ending corruption and joining nate not necessarily joining nato as a policy but like like hey we're

30:17

going to become better as a country underneath me i think at least in part was his message right and they

30:23

supposedly they have been working toward it they've been making strides and yadda yadda um and it is a slow process anything is

30:30

i mean when you have a country like ukraine who's been corrupt for god knows how long to undo all that and to just change the

30:37

system and how they operate a lot of eastern europe european countries still have kind of like parts of the middle east

30:43

kind of like parts of africa like there's still a cost of doing business as an example right like it's like you've gotta agree

30:49

something really yeah that's right listen you wanna build up you wanna set up shop here you gotta

30:55

you gotta pay to play i actually recently or recently like last year started reading a book about um

31:02

i forgot the the topic i think the topic was was the rise

31:07

of of ultra nationalism again in in europe and the book starts with uh with

31:13

the fall of the soviet union it talks about how so many countries were like we want what the west has

31:19

and so they were electing people that that were you know

31:24

electing government officials who are saying yeah we're going to get closer to to to the

31:30

west and the west was saying okay you need to do x y and z you need to have free press and you know less corruption

31:35

like all the things that essentially ukraine is trying to do and so those politicians started to implement

31:41

that but they were alienating a lot of their own people because it was

31:47

still part of the cup part of the cultures in eastern europe were still

31:53

uh still had elements that would be considered undemocratic and and anti uh you know not anti-west but but

32:00

on let's just say let's just say what it is a lot of these countries like you know

32:06

romania is a famous one he used to be communist their government

32:12

still to this day and you can fact check this even though they have more of a democracy now

32:17

a lot of the old players like the oldies old what we would call career politicians in romania still have

32:26

they've completely transitioned into a new form of government but their values and how they operate what it is that they do

32:33

seems to come off as still having that communist kind of feel behind it because of the way they

32:39

do things like they haven't lost or even care to evolve the way they do things because it's the way they've always done them

32:45

even though the the end goal or the the you know whatever the goal is that they're trying to do

32:50

is within the the the democracy that they serve so i wouldn't be surprised again a place

32:57

like ukraine has been corrupt for a very long time and now you're trying to uproot these people and change everything they've been doing for so

33:03

long it's not an easy task you know not an easy task

33:08

one more thing about about trump so so i think part of the argument well

33:14

a large part if not the the part if not the argument about trump supposedly

33:21

if he was an office steve print your friend would have been invaded is based on what people see as donald trump

33:28

projecting strength for him for himself about himself and about about and for the us but that's assuming

33:35

that putin's not strong no but you know i agree with you right this is what people are saying donald trump he's he

33:42

he killed zuma mainly he you know in in iran he he i don't know he was tough right he

33:49

was he was tough and the world anybody on that part of the world would say putin is equally as

33:56

tough the thing is you have to remember you know we can say what we want about trudeau we can say what we want about

34:02

maybe even possibly uh what's the guys from uh mexico fox i think his last name who president he's president of mexico i

34:09

don't even know doesn't matter but we can possibly have better perspectives of what they're doing

34:14

because they're on our side of the world what putin's doing on that side of the world is a little bit foreign to us because we don't see it every day

34:21

all we see is what they do that we may or may not perceive as kind of sketchy and then it's up to our media which we

34:27

already know is untrustworthy to tell us what it's very untrustworthy what may or

34:33

may not be real the difference between biased and untrustworthy am i biased i'm trustworthy am i biased in general

34:40

no are you biased i am are you a trustworthy i'm not i'm trustworthy i agree

34:46

so it's two different things okay but that first phase forget forget um putin

34:51

forget well for a second forgetful right so let's just let's just for a moment

34:58

hypothetically we can see donald trump strong and and we had a tougher posture under donald trump we did okay

35:05

hypothetically for the argument for argument's sake because what would be different

35:11

under trump would would he have declared war but that's what i'm saying we don't know you

35:17

know i don't mean i don't mean we don't know what putin i don't know if donald trump would have declared war or anything that's what i mean no no

35:22

president wants to go to war with russia and plus we don't know that just because if donald trump were here putin's

35:28

actions would have been any different because again his actions on that on that side of the world are foreign to us but i'm he was

35:36

going to know but i'm talking about people's arguments i believe putin was going to do this regardless of whoever was in the white house because it was

35:42

what he wanted to do based on his own intel and it's what he wanted to do at the time he wanted to do it

35:48

that's basically it but i i just want to cover like what people's argument is so people are saying donald trump was

35:53

strong putin putin knew he was strong and he wouldn't have done it but what would that in practice

35:59

i'm trying to figure out like what these people think would have been the strong reaction versus the weak reaction

36:05

because nobody even none of the republicans now are saying we should we should declare war matter of fact they're there

36:10

some some of them are actually saying we shouldn't even be sanctioning uh uh putin right because it's none of our

36:16

business that's no threat to us well now putin on the to counter the sanctions is just pretty much sanctioned all the the

36:21

democrats that sanction him i mean this whole thing with the sanctions what does it really do well so so for for on the

36:29

russian side we've we've frozen as far as i know we've frozen all of their

36:34

assets both both government assets that we have here in our banks as well as as the assets like

36:40

like um but they can still do business with whoever will do business with with whoever will do business with them china

36:47

will go by their world iran iran will do business with them china will buy their oil as long as they want

36:53

as long as it's in china's best interest other countries however small they may be may still continue to do that

36:59

sure but by and large most saudi arabia saudi arabia will buy russian oil with

37:04

the chinese one instead

37:12

saudi arabia so in any case most countries have have sanctioned and won't do

37:17

business with them and it's already it's already if not crippling significantly weakening

37:23

weakening their their economy um but again like the question stands what

37:29

would the strong reaction have been if not like what's what's the strong range for

37:36

us to predict right between well i'm sorry i'm asking this hypothetically more more toward toward toward uh any

37:42

any uh ridiculous conservative uh um and that's the key word ridiculous conservative um the listener we might

37:50

have some some conservatives are okay the moderate ones but the the right as much as people would have loved to for trump

37:56

to do something strong and grandiose and this big [ __ ] he wouldn't have had more options than would biden is that maybe

38:02

the sanctions would have come sooner i don't know some people are saying they should have become undivided but like

38:08

that's where that's where it would stop short unless you're saying as a republican you would support going to

38:14

war with russia if donald trump was president but i don't think donald trump would have wanted to go to war either i think

38:21

anybody who assumes that would that would be ridiculous that because one number one we don't we

38:26

don't know that that's what we that's what he would have done we are assuming that but because it's you say he's a

38:31

strong person but we don't know what he would have done and plus i i don't think he would

38:37

have done that if donald trump is so pro-america as as you know as people think he is and how is he portrays

38:43

himself why would he want to risk the lives of american soldiers to go you know and police the world again to

38:49

do things that really have nothing to do with us as far as that part of the world

38:55

you know i think he may have even tried to i think what donald trump would have done

39:00

in in and just trying to figure out you know what options would come about would

39:05

probably maybe have a face-to-face conversation with putin because it wasn't like they were on bad terms they've spoken to each

39:12

other many times before during the presidency before the presidency why why wouldn't he just want to say let

39:18

me let's go talk to people there was there was the time that uh that uh donald trump went to russia and

39:24

he was uh he was video videotaped in um in compromising positions with with

39:30

certain certain russians repeat that that's such nonsense and it was never proven

39:37

but it was disgusting too but it's possible it's listen anything

39:42

is possible but it was gross if it was true do you think do you think that's less possible

39:47

than uh than the bruises conspiracy charisma is true though what do you mean

39:52

by that well the best already it depends on what you mean it depends on what i mean

39:58

so that hunter biden was collecting money but it's public knowledge already i don't know so so but that's not what

40:04

the conspiracy theory is like it is public knowledge that hunter by conspiracy that it was on his laptop and

40:09

then there's a lot of other um uh what's the word i'm looking for uh evidence on that laptop that pretty much

40:16

goes against everything biden's ever defended when they came to his son well so so but this here's what the

40:21

conspiracy is right um this this 23 seconds into this video and we've

40:26

we've already gone in and these there okay so see what happens it's okay though this is what we're here for all

40:32

right this is what people this is how people have conversations on a day-to-day basis the lay person in this

40:38

country i don't get laid okay so

40:44

oh uh the the okay it's here here's here's what's what's at least generally accepted right uh

40:50

during the time that that uh uh joe biden was vice president his son

40:56

hunter biden was on the board uh executive board i think of his uh

41:01

board of directors right of this company burisma the ukrainian company oil and gas i don't even know what they do

41:06

telecom who the [ __ ] who the [ __ ] no okay um hey well let's talk about what we do

41:12

know he was collecting a paycheck from them right as as board members of any company dude

41:18

um and and the company was also getting investigated and joe biden had that in

41:23

this hold on back up back up you're going too fast um okay so what it was 2015 2014 2015. i

41:31

don't know ish um okay so let's just put it put a year just for supposedly 2015. joe biden is

41:37

president hunter biden is getting paid a salary and a salary to to be on a board

41:42

supposedly for for advice and consulting who knows maybe maybe not okay um

41:49

what else okay also around that time there was a ukrainian

41:55

uh oh my god why can't i think of the title attorney general i think it was the turn

42:01

right an attorney general uh was was inve investigating

42:07

investigating baristas for corruption at the same time because let's not i

42:14

feel like that's too too there's a lot of uh there's a spin on that

42:19

here's what's fat the attorney general well what i think is back um

42:25

the attorney general of ukraine was was conducting a bunch of investigations

42:30

at the time maybe for corruption i i don't know okay

42:36

uh okay so now let's let's let's i think that's basically all that's generally accepted okay the least the least

42:43

controversial okay and biden said that if this guy isn't fired that's something well yeah i said the least controversial

42:49

now let's let's let's name it a few more things right um one

42:54

and i mean i guess if it's if you believe this but i have no reason to doubt it i haven't

43:00

seen evidence that convinces me to doubt it that attorney general was himself

43:07

corrupt he was in the investigations that he was conducting incl i guess including

43:13

verisma or even i don't see including the invest by and large the investigations it was

43:19

conducted and maybe baris mill was the exception but from what i understand and this goes into into a little bit of the

43:25

history as well on the joe biden side is that uh the investigations he was conducting were helping his buddies

43:32

somehow all the investigations are the majority of the investigations again charisma might have been the exception maybe it

43:38

was a legit corruption okay um at the same time jo one of joe biden's

43:45

pet projects they're not pet project but i think this he was asked to do this by by obama

43:51

uh was to help reduce corruption in ukraine that was that was one of his

43:57

stated duties by committing a corrupt act well no back up for a second that was one of his like president obama

44:03

asked him to reduce as part of modernizing ukraine and the thing we were talking about earlier right helping

44:09

ukraine be more more like the western okay so again it's

44:15

that stuff probably a little bit more controversial because you could say why was it joe

44:20

biden and that's somebody else i don't know like why does the president ask his vice

44:25

president to do anything why not just tell him to sit down shut the [ __ ] up right like it's it was asked by the

44:30

president okay uh the the corrupt thing i mean i guess more research would have

44:36

to be done but supposedly and again i haven't seen anybody counter this that the next attorney general after biden

44:44

had a hand in firing him was less corrupt again that could be fact checked but you could say okay what

44:51

did what did uh what what investigations were happening before the firing what investigations were happening after the

44:57

firing and and what is the evidence in each investigation you could

45:02

people have done that of course yeah but i think i'm just now that i'm i'm listening to you i think i think we

45:08

should change what we said i think we should replace fact check with research because who's fact checking the fact

45:15

checkers and we could look up things all we want and possibly come up with the wrong conclusions i think with proper research

45:22

we'll get the answers that we're looking for so okay so and research is is not the right word either because

45:28

are you do can you read ukrainian or russian i can barely read russian language we're just subject to whatever

45:33

translation right translations and so so yes there are people who have done the research all we can do is is

45:40

read through as much consolid er all we can do is consolidate what other people have have uncovered summarize all right

45:47

summarize it and okay so but but again i think so far

45:53

so far we've we've said things that things that are generally accepted things that are slightly less but are

45:58

still public i wouldn't say public information but

46:04

like nobody nobody yeah nobody's disputing that biden was asked by

46:10

by obama to reduce corruption let me just dispute that some people are saying oh it was convenient that it was biden

46:16

because he had a son at the time and so like they start to draw conclusions but just saying that he was asked to do this

46:21

was was not um he really really can't be disputed okay

46:26

so now let's go deeper deeper into this right where do we leave off on that video at

46:32

23 seconds in another three minutes and 20 19 seconds you think we should watch just a little

46:37

bit more and then continue or we want to keep on this subject well we might we might never come back to hunter biden

46:42

that's fine we can always do let me tell you the whole purpose of this episode was to keep our promise to our viewers

46:48

we did we did 23 seconds of it we don't think that's something i mean just like we talked about gas prices for five

46:54

minutes out of out of an episode on career politicians and whatever the hell so how we we talked about

47:00

okay let's watch a little bit more let's watch a little bit more okay uh do you wanna tell them we'll be right back we'll be right back

47:06

oh boy okay okay you can see how much pain i have just from

47:11

from this 20 seconds okay

47:16

this guy says can you keep me on we're back and we're back all right correct me

47:23

uh but he said two two things two things so he he he talks about

47:29

how liberal let's recap the whole thing how liberal they are how they hated trump how they loved biden

47:36

and how they're now supporting ukraine and then immediately somehow in this in

47:41

this retards i'm sorry excuse me in this individual we're going to get transferring train of thought we're not

47:48

going to get canceled i i didn't say the word anyway so um

47:53

no offense to people who who are truly challenged but this guy i don't like he again he's making leaps of logic

48:00

and he's saying it as if it's the same train of thought right like uh you know if i said hey uh my my guitar is red and

48:07

therefore you can't wear that shoe a little little okay so anyway so it

48:12

goes on after ukraine and liberals and anti-trump he says and they support a green agenda

48:21

that was motivated by greta thunder as if there was first of all if there is

48:27

such thing as a green agenda okay but let's put that aside as if

48:32

a a teenage girl from sweden switzerland i don't know where um somewhere in europe

48:37

as if she made up uh uh this idea of climate change

48:43

uh and and and every everyone who a believes in in a human cause climate

48:50

change and b people who want to do something about it as if they have no other sources to go to and nobody to

48:55

listen to but some teenager again nothing against her uh but as if they've nobody better listen to no experts

49:02

uh to cite other than than some teenage girl this is basically what would you more or less would just more or less

49:08

okay and then he said the green agenda has empowered i guess economically has

49:15

has empowered president putin and therefore right because he's empowered economically and so he it's it's um it's

49:22

one less thing he has to worry about right okay so i'll let you respond but i'll respond to

49:28

this question um how does a green agenda if one such thing exists

49:34

empower an oil and gas country we'll let the viewers answer that

49:40

viewers and listeners answer that question like comment subscribe buy our merch

49:46

like comment subscribe yeah share buy merch one sponsor

49:51

six things it's always six remember we'd like you to answer those questions if you have any other comments please put them in the comments

49:57

but i'll say this it doesn't i mean if there was a a pro oil and gas

50:02

if there was a pro fossil fuel agenda i would say that empowers russia it powers iran and some other middle eastern

50:08

countries and venezuela certainly but a green agenda not nazi in fact a green agenda would

50:15

argue weakens a fossil fuel economy okay

50:21

um and even if he was economically empowered which i arguable because a lot even a

50:27

lot of i've heard a lot of conservatives say that that donald trump imposed a lot of sanctions on russia

50:34

i doubt the validity of that but i hear this from the right okay so let's say that's true so 2016 to 2020

50:41

trump imposed a lot of sanctions i i've never heard a democrat argue

50:47

against sanctions toward russia so in theory those continued although again another argument from the right is that biden

50:53

removed some of the sanctions that trump put into place i haven't fact checked that research

50:59

that it just seems it just seems dubious maybe it's true maybe but given given

51:05

the rhetoric especially during the trump administration i heard a lot i heard trump say we should get closer to russia

51:10

i heard a lot of conservatives say he's doing the right thing by getting close to russia this was what i heard for four years and then suddenly two years after

51:17

trump leaves officer see not even actually you're not even a year and a half about a year

51:22

and two months all right 14 months into the body administration i'm i'm hearing

51:27

uh that that trump had had heavier sanctions than than the democrats it

51:33

just doesn't sound right um especially given given sort of the the more historical background

51:39

or context that uh the obama administration was was arming the the ukrainians it continued into the

51:45

trump administration trump tried to try to make that based on on a barista investigation i don't think it was

51:52

successful um and ultimately that was one that's what got him impeached one of the times

51:59

um anyway so again this this guy i think he's all over the map let's let's let's just give it another 20 seconds

52:07

we'll be right back okay another this guy says he does like groups of two okay so this is another

52:12

30 seconds and he said that uh that that uh

52:18

actors actor support toward ukraine is a virtual signaling and he said that um

52:26

what did he do the last thing he said he was he was talking about how um they're jumping on on the bandwagon

52:33

they like to support a leader who who's uh who's all about his own country and he

52:39

said they made the mistake of thinking that uh because they're they're paid we

52:45

pay them to watch them act or however does he put it right that their opinion matters okay so

52:51

no i've heard this from the right well i've heard this from hypocrites on left

52:57

and the right saying that that unless you're unless you're a subject

53:02

matter expert in x your opinion doesn't matter especially actors and actresses

53:07

unless they agree with unless this that group of radicals

53:22

people people are against actors and actresses speaking out uh unless they happen to agree with them and then it's

53:28

okay which is hypocritical and it's it's a sign of being radical but the other thing is that

53:33

no i don't think any actor maybe a few right but by and large i don't think these actors are thinking

53:39

i'm an actor i have been in movies and therefore my opinion on on

53:45

or or therefore my my opinion matters more has more weight on geopolitics or whatever

53:51

they're talking about i don't think they're thinking that i think that they they understand that they have a larger platform they can

53:57

utilize it to possibly influence people one way or the other um but i don't think that they think

54:02

that their opinion is going to outweigh any other private citizens opinion they just have

54:08

a bigger voice because of their platform and they have the money to afford a much larger platform or to listen to them and

54:15

people listen but now you know that doesn't take away the fact that they are private citizens just like

54:21

anybody else just because their job pays more than our job they still have a job they're still

54:27

private citizens they don't have special privileges unless they have the right people in the right places they can give them those privileges

54:34

but you know they still have to vote they still have to they can't just say i support such and such and you know they

54:40

still have to go through the voting process they still have to go and fill in the little ballot they have to be registered voters

54:46

you know the system doesn't work differently for them than it does for us i think it just comes down to they have

54:52

a much larger voice and at the same token i don't really care if they're in support of republicans or democrats i

54:59

don't think i think it's just that i think the people they're gonna get criticized and

55:05

they're going to get you know targeted primarily because they have a a bigger voice and

55:10

and it what it comes down to is let's take the rock for example everybody loves the rock but he came out

55:17

publicly and he endorsed joe biden and what he probably had half the country now hates him because of it

55:22

you know they're still going to buy his sneakers and on his under armour shoes they're still going to watch his movies

55:28

they're still going to do all these things but now they hate him because he endorsed joe biden now half the country hates him

55:34

and he did it with his larger platform that he could do it with but is are people going to still are

55:40

people are not going to watch his movies people are going to watch his movies and and also i don't think the world people are going to watch his movies they're

55:46

going to buy his merch they're going to watch his tv shows he's a sponsor they're going to sponsor them they're going to like share and subscribe to him

55:52

that's right now again does that mean that the rock just because he's outspoken does he think

55:58

that his opinion matters more than anybody else by virtue of him being famous no but but he has an opportunity

56:06

because he is famous and because people will will tune in and and listen to a certain thing

56:11

so he's he's going to say what what he wants to say right like even if it's nonsense even if it's

56:16

not not politically uh motivated or affiliated right like if

56:21

if the rock could say eating raw chicken is the number one thing that's going to get you big and muscular like him

56:27

at least there's going to be a good a considerable percentage of this country that's going to say well the rock does

56:33

it let's we have to do what the rock says so if we want to get big and from yeah that's right does does he think he's a nutritionist

56:40

i don't know maybe maybe right he's very interested into nutrition and fitness if he said to on

56:47

his on any platforms i'd drink 30 raw eggs a day to get this big and buff

56:54

somebody out there or lots of somebodies out there are going to start drinking 30 eggs 30 rugs a day because they just

57:00

they want to that's what that's what happens i think the the the summary is that is that the rock

57:07

probably considers more of an expert himself more of an expert on nutrition than he does geopolitics yet he still

57:12

talks about both right right just like any other person would that's right

57:18

just the only reason you hear about it as opposed to because of this

57:24

not what i thought you were going to say i don't know why but uh hey we don't know if that's what he calls it

57:33

you know to the rocks platform platform

57:40

by the way my platform's called stanley oh god i don't think mine's named

57:45

you know the power tool has something something this great doesn't because it doesn't get a name you know it's just it just exists anyway

58:02

okay anyway um i think we're i think we're done this with this video this [ __ ] muumuu

58:08

excuse my language the the the general idea of the video is basically

58:15

you know just this journalist you know and i'm i'm a republican i'm a conservative but i mean i like to stay

58:22

i like my comments to be as neutral as possible as far as understanding when i'm wrong when i'm right and

58:29

how we can deliver information that's that's just down the middle whether or not we lean one way or the

58:34

other you know which is why i think both of us are are on kind of different spectrums

58:40

politically but we also understand that we can have a civilized conversation and agree and disagree and possibly come

58:47

to maybe different conclusions or even different solutions to different things we're just not in a position to to

58:53

implement them but that's not the point i'm making the point i'm making is the whole idea of this video is

59:00

basically just bashing people for the sake of bashing people because they have an opinion that's louder than most

59:08

you know just because these actors may have a a lot more money than most and they have a bigger platform than most and

59:16

you know it's just about you know this listen half of these i'm going to say a good

59:22

percentage of of the liberals on the democrat side do do what this guy is criticizing but i

59:29

don't hear him criticizing the regular liberal he's only criticizing these actors who have larger platforms

59:36

to speak their mind you know but if he truly believed in what he was saying he's he's also accusing them of of

59:42

being disingenuous but he literally said that well i mean in in not so many words that the only

59:49

reason they're supporting ukraine is because like it's it's like the popular thing to do virtue signaling

59:55

right but i mean but who's to say that this is not what they really feel you know and that just because they have

1:00:00

a much larger platform to say it doesn't diminish whether or not they feel it you know really or not i mean let's let's explain

1:00:07

that the probability that they're also getting paid on the side to actually say these things who the hell knows they

1:00:13

probably think oh this is regular politics give me a couple dollars and i'll say whatever you want that could also be that's a probable thing that

1:00:19

could be happening as well but until we know that for a fact we don't

1:00:25

and again to criticize somebody just because just because they have a larger platform

1:00:30

i think it's a very cheap way to get people riled up you know it's a it's a very cheap pop

1:00:37

you know and it's a cheap thrill to to just get people wound up over something that's so insignificant is that

1:00:43

you know there's a there's a lot of people who don't have the platform of the money but yet have the same exact

1:00:50

um train of thought the same exact opinions and the same exact way of thinking but yet nobody wants to ever

1:00:57

speak out against them because they don't matter i guess as much as an actor who has millions and has a bigger

1:01:02

platform so i i hear this and this this might be a slight tangent but i i hear

1:01:08

this more i think i've only heard the term virtue signaling

1:01:13

at least prominently right it's a term that exists in society but i've as a prominent talking point i think i've

1:01:20

only heard it from the right it as as if to say that anytime anyone expresses empathy

1:01:28

for any other human being for whatever reason if they're an underserved

1:01:34

population or they're or there's a humanitarian like whatever the reason is because because they're they're they're

1:01:40

trans athlete whatever reason whatever context somebody accuses somebody else's virtue

1:01:45

signaling what i hear is is is is an is an accusation of one being disingenuous and

1:01:52

b that that any expression of empathy is is um

1:01:58

is i don't use the word genuine but like is done solely for the purpose of

1:02:03

yourself seeking attention like like a um like a societal uh what's what's the the

1:02:10

it's not a disease but if i make you sick so i get attention uh you know what i'm talking about

1:02:15

you mean like the um oh munchausen yeah yeah that's right um

1:02:21

or or munch housing by proxy is if you make somebody else say um as as if it's it's some sort of social

1:02:29

munch houses by proxy like no you can you can express empathy for

1:02:34

for a person or group of people that are suffering in some way without without doing it solely for for

1:02:42

seeking attention but i think there's a lot of people also i don't know if they do it to seek attention as much as

1:02:48

they do it to just kind of listen there have been so many documented cases of people

1:02:54

especially in the in the liberals um there have been a lot of documented cases especially like people from the

1:03:00

antifa that have left that group and other liberal um groups who have come forward and openly

1:03:07

admitted that one of the main reasons that i was in antifa was because i just didn't want to be ostracized i wanted to keep my

1:03:13

friends around me and even if i didn't believe in what they were doing you know i i didn't want to be that one

1:03:19

person who spoke out against what they were doing and i knew that this was my only group of friends friends and if i had done

1:03:25

such a thing they would ostracize me and i would no longer have any friends around me since

1:03:31

this was my core group of people that i surrounded myself with once i found myself disagreeing with what they were

1:03:36

saying i was in a position and i'm saying i mean the liberals who spoke out we're in

1:03:42

a position of it's almost uh with the word

1:03:47

like not a it was a social pressure peer pressure to just continue on with the group and i don't want to be demeaning

1:03:53

and call them sheep or anything like that i don't want to i don't want to do that because peer pressure is a real thing listen we were all kids too at one

1:04:00

point peer pressure affected a lot of us you know we all tried to smoke a cigarette once because of peer pressure

1:04:06

or drink a beer when you were like 10 years old because of peer pressure or do something because of pre-op

1:04:11

maybe you said something to a girl or a guy out of peer pressure because your friends just i mean we've all done it at

1:04:18

some point but i think you know people who tend to be awkward or people who tend to be a

1:04:24

little bit not as outgoing or you know introverts

1:04:30

that's what i'm looking for not as outgoing maybe maybe doing certain things in society doesn't come as easy

1:04:36

to them and then they find a group that is accepting and is welcoming uh and yet

1:04:42

they go up you know completely against their their um their belief system but now think about

1:04:48

it if they're going against your belief system but in other in every other way they're completely accepting of you

1:04:54

why would you risk wanting to let that go and i think there's a lot of people

1:04:59

that that's where the virtue signaling goes into they do that number one like you said i agree

1:05:06

because it makes them feel better it's like i'm going to be anti-racist because i want to make people think that i'm a

1:05:11

better person i mean you're full of [ __ ] and the other side of it is what i'm saying a lot of them don't even believe

1:05:16

in any of this [ __ ] they just don't want to lose that group of friends that's what this guy in the video was saying that he was saying he's basically saying

1:05:23

but he's saying that in a very unfair way well he's saying it a very very

1:05:28

unfair and biased kind of it's just not it's not right the way he's saying that's right but but it's

1:05:34

the same argument he's basically saying he's saying to these to these actors you're only supporting ukraine because

1:05:40

it's what the cool kids are doing now as if there can be no other reason right but i mean listen let's let's also play

1:05:47

it fair though a lot of them are probably doing just that because it's the cool thing to do a lot of them

1:05:53

some some of them not all of them definitely don't you think there's a higher percentage of actors i didn't say that

1:05:59

no no but i'm asking do you think there's a higher percentage of actors who are supporting ukraine

1:06:06

than than the general population do you think it's an equal percentage i

1:06:11

think it could be an equal percentage if if you if you if you do the math if you count regular

1:06:18

population has has um what their support or influence has

1:06:23

over it and then you you equate that with the i think it's just it could be pretty much equal

1:06:29

okay i i think it's easier to look at the actors of the people of influence who are not supporting what's going on in

1:06:35

ukraine than it is to look at who are supporting because then it's easier to pick out who's not part of the crowd

1:06:43

but again like are these people not supporting it just to be different or are they not supporting because whatever for whatever reason they just maybe

1:06:49

they're not supporting it because they just don't want to get involved right so maybe somebody's like you know

1:06:55

what i'm an actor but that doesn't mean my opinion matters well think about it this way looking in the united states how many actors have been involved in

1:07:01

the in politics in the last six years you think more than before

1:07:06

no no i'm just i'm i'm asking a question with with a point here how many actors do you think

1:07:12

um supported in any kind of political side within the last six years here in the united states

1:07:17

now how many of those actors are we not even aware of that [ __ ] made no more didn't even

1:07:23

made no appearances didn't speak about anything you probably didn't even hear their name they were never mentioned

1:07:29

they're prominent actors but we haven't heard them say [ __ ] the entire time because they just don't want to be

1:07:34

involved so we don't even think about those people those are actors they could be top-notch

1:07:40

actors and yet because they stayed away you don't hear about them but they because they're actors though they get

1:07:46

kind of bunched up into the general numbers of oh all these actors are virtue signaling and all these actors are but yet well okay but understand

1:07:54

that you can make the same argument how many actors like with ukraine are like i feel bad

1:08:00

for them they say it's a humanitarian crisis haven't set a peep on social media or to the media or in

1:08:06

public but are donating thousands of dollars maybe right like we don't they could be the

1:08:13

ones that genuinely think that there is something to be to be worried about in the ukraine but now here's another thing

1:08:18

that the guy in the video said and i'm just going to ask you a question what about all of a sudden these these people who

1:08:23

are supporting what's going on in ukraine are worried about the borders in ukraine and how they have to be secured but yet when it came to the

1:08:29

to the united states borders it was a completely different situation do you think it's that simple no it's not that simple and further for

1:08:35

the uh and for the record it's not the same thing it's not even close to this

1:08:41

i mean okay maybe this is somewhat close but it's it's it's not the same thing russia is genuinely invading in a with

1:08:49

war machines going into the ukraine they're going with tanks and heavy artillery heavy weaponry with whatever

1:08:55

they can to try to invade this country and take it over if we're talking about mexicans and and

1:09:01

hondurans and guatemalans coming into the united states these people just want to come in they want a better life they want a better life now are they are they

1:09:07

catching a couple of them coming in with fentanyl and cocaine and all kinds of other [ __ ] of course but are are we

1:09:13

going to say 100 of them are coming into traffic drugs no

1:09:18

do i blame the immigration um am i against immigration no i am

1:09:23

actually pro-immigration am i against illegal immigration 100

1:09:29

i'm against illegal immigration but in my opinion

1:09:34

the [Music] the road to citizenship in this country is also

1:09:40

ridiculously unreasonably just nonsensically stupid

1:09:48

i couldn't tell if somebody said how do you become a citizen i don't really get a green card i i don't even know it's just it's and and even

1:09:55

the people who are and nobody can have this i mean you can research this all you want because this is what the right does the right says oh if you do it the

1:10:01

right way let me tell you something there have been people here from other countries that come here to do it the right way the legal way and the the

1:10:08

system is so [ __ ] up it takes them so long to go through the process that even though they have a visa if

1:10:14

that visa runs out and you don't say on top of it those people get deported and what do you tell them oh they were doing

1:10:20

it the right way they waited for years well you know the process to become a

1:10:25

citizen in this country is ridiculous there's other countries that their immigrant their illegal

1:10:31

immigration situation is a lot less prominent than ours but it's because it's easier it's because right it's

1:10:37

easier to become a citizen and what happens when you become a citizen you now convert these immigrants into

1:10:43

taxpaying citizens who are able to contribute directly to society well okay

1:10:48

even if they send their money to any other country they still have to pay taxes here illegal immigrants are

1:10:53

bypassing that because they're getting paid cash so there is and i haven't looked into it

1:10:59

but there is and in certain states the rules change i know north carolina has some

1:11:04

weird 180 day thing that goes on there there are some like

1:11:10

i i don't know this the specifics the statistics or or how how they're categorized

1:11:16

but my understanding is they're they're so i'll put it this way

1:11:23

there there are people who have come here illegally

1:11:29

yet pay taxes that that i don't know how many they are a small small subset

1:11:35

and maybe it's because they they even though they came here illegally they like declared themselves and like now

1:11:41

they're in some kind of process bottom line is like once once you get not a social security number but once

1:11:47

you get a taxpayer tax id number you you and assuming you're not getting paid cash you're you're paying taxes and

1:11:53

there there is a subset of those and as a matter of fact and even if you're getting paid cash is

1:11:58

if you're paying taxes in this country and you're let's say you're pseudo-legal sure you still have to fill out a

1:12:04

nine-nine you fill out a nine-nine guess what you may be getting paid in cash but

1:12:09

the company still has to report your earnings at the end of the year sure and at the end of the year if you weren't getting a w-2 guess what now you are

1:12:15

responsible for those taxes one way or another yeah the government the government will know that how much you're earning now

1:12:23

uh how the hell do we get on this point oh the comparison between the borders of the ukraine

1:12:28

okay so this is what happens folks join jonas for the ride

1:12:34

uh some states like like new york and california and maybe it's just new york city but the places where

1:12:40

non-citizens have been given a right to vote there have been there have been a few places like this right and i think new york city is one of them yeah they

1:12:47

they do that for people who are paying taxes so it's not somebody that's undocumented

1:12:53

they're documented they're declared they have a tax id number and they're paying taxes now the rationale but they're not citizens

1:13:00

they shouldn't be able to vote well the argument is let me ask let's let's go back into

1:13:05

history what was one of the like the famous reasons we declared independence from from england taxes

1:13:11

specifically taxing taxes without representation that's like taxation without

1:13:17

representation that's right is theft and so these people who are paying taxes

1:13:23

in this country buy a tax id number and they're declared they're not undocumented did they have if they have

1:13:28

a document to pay a tax right right right they have to trace they are they are now being taxed without representation and that's the argument

1:13:34

in these places right so which is completely different than an

1:13:39

an undocumented person getting the right to vote and it's also completely different than anybody walking in off

1:13:45

the streets saying hi i'm here i want to vote i get to vote now the only thing the only argument i have within

1:13:52

i am anti-illegal immigration when it comes to the taxes thing here's here's what's funny about this whole this whole

1:13:59

situation the right love to say again i'm a republican i'm conservative however a

1:14:05

lot of things hap if they don't make sense i will point them out the right are the first ones to say

1:14:10

taxation without representation is theft no actually actually and this is more the libertarian argument and i actually

1:14:16

agree with this taxation is that that's what they say okay taxation is that

1:14:21

that's not my point though they say taxation is theft right that's what they say whether or not it is it's

1:14:27

irrelevant that's what they say is it not it isn't okay but when immigrants

1:14:32

come in and they're not paying taxes you know they say well they have to pay taxes yeah they suddenly whoa you're

1:14:38

either guest taxes or your products all of a sudden you are pro [ __ ] tax but because you have to pay taxes theft

1:14:46

you cannot cherry pick what part of that you like and don't agree with you either are for them or you're not you can't say

1:14:54

well taxation is theft but if that illegal immigrant comes in he better pay [ __ ] taxes because i'm not going to

1:15:00

support him because my money's going to pay for his this that or the other dude are you for it are you against it

1:15:07

either way you got to pick your poison you can't play both sides of defense and you can talk out of both sides of

1:15:13

your mouth he's like oh well taxation is death but if the illegal immigrant comes in here he's not paying taxes

1:15:19

pick your [ __ ] poison don't play defense that's [ __ ] [ __ ] this is why people don't believe that's right most of the [ __ ] that right wingers say

1:15:25

in fact they should what they should be saying is taxation is theft and good for that immigrant

1:15:31

for not for sticking it to the government and not paying taxes that should be the argument right what

1:15:36

everybody on the right should do if you really believe that taxation is death let's all go to mexico come into the

1:15:42

country illegally and then just stop paying taxes and actually don't give us some money because if they're going to consider us

1:15:48

illegal aliens they'll give us money and some land in a house whatever the hell else [ __ ] we want and guess what we can

1:15:54

play in the house i don't know i'm pulling [ __ ] out of my ass but we won't pay taxes because if

1:15:59

that's what they're doing and that's what you think that they're doing and that's what everybody accuses them of doing and you think taxation is death

1:16:05

then why aren't we all doing it

1:16:11

dude i think taxation is that my point is if taxation is theft which i think it

1:16:16

is i'm not gonna also then turn around and say well if the legal immigrant comes in he has to pay tax

1:16:22

that makes no [ __ ] sense you're feeding into a system which you are playing against

1:16:27

so in essence if you want somebody else to come and pay taxes and yet you don't want to you just made the enemy stronger

1:16:34

because you're you're i listen i can go on and on but do you but do you but you see what i'm saying

1:16:40

no that's right there has been most people are completely hypocritical it's like anything it's like any type of situation i believe in freedom and you

1:16:47

should be able to do whatever you want except have control over your own uterus

1:16:53

or have sex and marry not even or have sex and marry whoever you want you you

1:16:59

shouldn't have that right either because of my religion but i believe in freedom you can do whatever you want otherwise other than those three things that was

1:17:05

also a thing about listen i am again i'm a conservative but does the government have any right to

1:17:10

tell anybody who to have sex with or who to marry [ __ ] no or whatever

1:17:16

mind your [ __ ] business you know this is where and this is this is in my opinion why

1:17:22

conservatives especially the very very you know like hardcore ones that are more prominent in politics have a have a

1:17:29

tough time because they're they're they're focused so much on bible beating people to death with these you know

1:17:35

these conservative values you're not listen you're in politics for a reason to stick to the [ __ ] politics your

1:17:42

morals are not everybody else's morals that's right your religious beliefs are not everybody else's religious places

1:17:51

every single person in god if you believe so strongly about the values of this country since you want to be that

1:17:57

virtue signaling value person from the right then guess what that same way of

1:18:03

thinking that same train of thought has to go with everything else if you think that everybody has the freedom to do what they want and the government needs

1:18:09

to be small and let people do what they want then you know what stay out of their [ __ ] bedrooms stay out of their bodies instead of their [ __ ] lives

1:18:16

leave them alone you can't have it both ways oh you can have all the freedom but at least you have to do it but my

1:18:22

version of your friend i agree with you only the freedoms i tell you then that is not true conservative that is not

1:18:27

true that is not being a true republican that is playing the [ __ ] political game and you're full of [ __ ] and you're

1:18:33

you're just a scumbag for doing it if you're a true republican you believe in freedom stay the [ __ ] away from

1:18:39

people leave them alone don't tell people what to do let's pick on the democrats for a second well let's let's

1:18:44

end it here it's already an hour and a half in okay what one one i'm already motivated let's just pick he's just

1:18:50

warmed up folks it's only an hour and a half not even okay uh but let's pick on the dems for a second uh they believe in

1:18:57

freedom too you could do whatever you want with your body except reviews are shot

1:19:03

that's right yes you can do whatever you want so as long as you take this vaccine and if you don't take the vaccine you're

1:19:08

a piece of [ __ ] and you're going to kill your grandmother and everybody else's grandmother but you could do whatever

1:19:13

you want with your uterus just not your arm that's right yeah hey you don't have to get an abortion

1:19:19

but if you do i hope you can get it all the way up to like a couple of weeks after birth that's not true get that

1:19:24

come on come on that's it um the supreme the supreme court has a set of viability which is about approximately 24 weeks

1:19:30

it's these states are that are trying to push it back to six or eight or ten weeks that they're they're they're

1:19:36

ridiculous okay um and also you can say whatever you want as long as as long as it's something i agree with that's a liberal

1:19:42

stance on it if i don't like what you're saying we're gonna cancel you so you can say whatever you can say

1:19:47

whatever you want to say as long as we agree with you as long as i like the way it sounds

1:19:54

but if you offend anybody in the group that's with us then we're going to cancel you i believe in diversity of

1:20:00

culture and thought but it's only thoughts that i agree with i believe and you say whatever the [ __ ] you want to

1:20:06

say [ __ ] whosever feelings you hurt if they don't like it guess what switch change your channel walk away

1:20:13

and to quote the great ricky gervais how [ __ ] arrogant are you to think that you can go throughout life and not have

1:20:19

to listen to anything you don't agree with you're [ __ ] arrogant and full of [ __ ] you know who wanted to control what

1:20:24

people thought lenin and stalin and look what happened to him well look at what happened to the people

1:20:30

that followed them is probably more but stalin died of old age and i think so did london although

1:20:36

uh well exactly but look at the people who followed him who followed those two [ __ ] look what

1:20:41

happened to them ended up in breadline starving to [ __ ] death or sent to siberia right

1:20:46

right kill yeah let's do that if that's what the liberals want let them get a taste of it

1:20:51

send them to [ __ ] siberia or our version let's let's talk to trudeau since he seems like a liberal let's say

1:20:57

hey buddy we know you got some [ __ ] tundra up there in the north let's send some of our [ __ ] liberals up there since that's what they want

1:21:04

let's do it this is what lenin did that's what stalin did i'm sure under the marx what is it the

1:21:09

communist manifesto i'm sure that's part of well you know what and the direction that they would go i don't know have you

1:21:16

ever read karl marx i have and karl marx ever had a [ __ ] job he was a moocher and a scumbag and

1:21:22

you want to [ __ ] take economics from this [ __ ] this guy never had a job that was a piece of [ __ ] read his book

1:21:29

you know what what the the read the book you know what the democratic socialists would say that communism was never implemented properly

1:21:36

true communism would be successful it's never and you know what's funny

1:21:43

uh um what do they call themselves anarcho-capitalists um

1:21:48

from the from the from the people who hate labels they love to give themselves these weird [ __ ] names

1:21:59

they're libertarians who who believe that there shouldn't be any government and just like just a society with

1:22:06

based on capitalism mad max not mad max there's the the idea is that is that

1:22:12

capitalism as it's in its in its own right outside of the existence of a government would

1:22:17

would can somehow control people but i i bring that up it makes no sense

1:22:22

i bring that up because they also because you people people point to historical uh times when when government

1:22:30

didn't involve itself in in whatever pick an example um uh the title i'll give two quick

1:22:37

examples time before uh the the the federal reserve right before it was 1920s or maybe 30s before

1:22:44

the federal reserve there there were there were depressions and recessions and there were times of

1:22:49

boom right just like they've been since the federal reserve and people say oh federal

1:22:54

reserve it shouldn't exist the government but from what i understand

1:22:59

those those the the swings were much more volatile like you had a depression [ __ ] went

1:23:05

down people were starving and okay and the booms booms might have been bigger but what the federal reserve

1:23:10

has done has has essentially you know narrowed the range of

1:23:15

or narrowed the um the the extreme of that of that range

1:23:21

right so that the lows are less work less low because of the federal reserve

1:23:26

and and the other the other example i can point to is his prohibition right like literally when the government said

1:23:31

this alcohol is illegal what happened people were making it without the supervision of the government you're dying you had that boy yeah [ __ ]

1:23:39

people going blind people [ __ ] dying of mercury poisoning and all kinds of weird [ __ ] that's right alex we give

1:23:46

give a third example right before a lot of uh environmental regulations i think they should bring back prohibition of

1:23:51

every single thing of everything yeah i think you wanna bring prohibition

1:23:56

back because you know what perhaps this [ __ ] country needs a purge and the only way we're going to do it is to let

1:24:01

the stupid people [ __ ] just straight just call themselves out let's call the herd by letting the dumb folks just do

1:24:08

what they got to do again survival of the fittest let them do what they're going to do

1:24:13

because i swear to you i promise you especially here in this country we will see a lot of all these kids starting

1:24:20

tide pods and condoms yeah let them do it prohibited snorting comptons snorting

1:24:26

condoms because they were doing a trick they would put up their nose to blow it out of their mouth that's what they were doing they were also eating tide pods

1:24:32

and doing weird [ __ ] with that well it's coming pretty flavors yeah they look cool they look like candy listen let

1:24:38

them all do it survival of the fittest you want to call the herd prohibit everything put a [ __ ] label of do not

1:24:44

do this on the [ __ ] can or whatever it is and just let all the [ __ ] idiots just take care of themselves

1:24:50

let's finish why are we overpopulated let's do it okay so but let's let's finish one

1:24:55

thought right so so we said we said how um communist i'm angry folks i'm fed up

1:25:01

with the dead democrat now he's warmed up okay so the democratic socialists say well and communists say oh communism has

1:25:06

been uh done in in the right way it hasn't done its true form and that's why the the

1:25:12

world examples of fit okay well when you tell antarctica capitalists like look at the times that government hasn't been

1:25:17

involved look at the bad things that have happened you know what they they say the same [ __ ] opposite end of the spectrum you know what they say well it

1:25:23

hasn't been tried the proper way hasn't been tried the real way get the you you the amount of cognitive dissonance

1:25:31

that and leaps of logic that you need to take to say to anyone that presents you

1:25:36

with examples where something has been tried and you say no husband tried the right way

1:25:41

you you're you you [ __ ] do it you're you're gonna do better than stalin you're gonna do better than than [ __ ]

1:25:47

mao right like you're the guy and i'm not saying these people were geniuses you're gonna implement communism and not

1:25:52

kill one single person yeah that's right not starving one single person and and not make one poor

1:25:58

one poor person even poor because now they have to rely on the system that's right you're going to make

1:26:03

communism in such a way that people don't lose motivation to perform and and and try to do better than than the next

1:26:10

guy right you're the guy to do it that's right you're you're that genius that's right comrade take it

1:26:17

back to the smile same thing same thing about anarcho-capitalist just just to round this out right like you're going to be the guy to make sure that

1:26:23

companies don't pollute the environment when nobody is checking on them then that they're not going to form

1:26:28

monopolies and raise prices of 10 000 percent to the audience so that's right yes

1:26:34

no because they always do the right thing when the government is looking get those [ __ ] out of here listen this is what this is the problem

1:26:40

today with everybody thinking that they have the best idea but yet you know everybody has the answers and nobody's

1:26:46

willing to discuss them and then when you challenge them they want to come at you with the

1:26:52

as much of a defensive attitude and yet their stance still has no ground because they can't [ __ ] come up with an

1:26:58

educated enough answer to defend themselves so what do they do they resort to name calling they'll resort to

1:27:04

[ __ ] calling us weirdos or whatever the [ __ ] they want to do but yet can they come with an edge can they come

1:27:09

back with an educated um anything a rebuttal as to why they would be the one person to do

1:27:16

better than stalin lenin castro mao paul pot tell me keep going i can continue

1:27:23

and you tell me one of these people who again they didn't perfect it right so

1:27:29

what makes you better than them they tried the same system that you're about to try that you want to try there's only

1:27:34

one rule book to communism the moment you change the rules and the playbook on

1:27:40

communism it stops being communism so that means that if you want to implement communism you're going to have to try to

1:27:46

do it the same way all the previous names i just mentioned did and guess what don't think you're going to be the

1:27:51

one guy or one girl because it could be any gender i'm not going to assume but don't think you're going to be that one

1:27:57

person that magically is gonna [ __ ] do [ __ ] so different that all well they just didn't do this one thing

1:28:04

guess what i got something i got some news to tell you people are [ __ ] up in this world you think that because you

1:28:09

have wood and they have steel they want to trade with you they're going to tell you to go [ __ ] yourself they don't want to barter with you so then what's going

1:28:15

to end up happening you're going to have to take it by force because if you really need it you're going to have to find a way to get it eventually it will

1:28:21

be by force and what happens when you take things by force you end up killing people

1:28:26

so okay so i don't know about that i think i think bartering has has existed for a long time and it's watering has

1:28:32

existed for a long time but communism is in no no one of the problems of communism is is

1:28:38

essentially saying well it's taken from peter to pay paul in order to but to whatever right that in the end

1:28:44

being everyone is going to have the same amount of stuff but everyone endeavor does well hold on the idea is everyone's

1:28:50

going to have the same amount of stuff but what happens is everybody has [ __ ]

1:28:56

everybody does it the same not only that everybody has except a few although

1:29:01

that they have all the nice [ __ ] but here's another thing and people tend to forget you let's build all these cool things

1:29:08

with the things we have okay let's pay our doctors the same thing that we pay a guy who hammers your nail

1:29:14

into wood that's what you want to do um but remember now these things have to be repaired and replaced with other

1:29:21

materials perhaps even evolved into better materials materials that you might not have if you need to evolve

1:29:28

something or build something with a material that you don't have but yet you're a communist country what do you

1:29:33

do you go to the nearest country that supports you maybe that may have the materials you

1:29:40

need and you need to then figure out some kind of a connection like china and russia china has a [ __ ] ton of [ __ ] that

1:29:46

russia needs so they be they they kind of keep each other pseudo friends just so they can exchange materials because

1:29:53

there's things in russia that russians need but they don't have so they have to go to their next

1:29:58

your communist country but you need materials materials that your country cannot produce and does not have what do

1:30:04

you do you go to the nearest country that's possibly an ally or a friend that does

1:30:11

but what if they're not what if the country that does have it is your [ __ ] enemy only because you perceive

1:30:16

them to be that's how you treated them because they just didn't agree what you were doing but yet you need that favor then what do you do i'll tell you what

1:30:22

you do you either go to war with these [ __ ] or you end communism and and became and begin free trade

1:30:29

and when you begin free trade what does that do well okay so i mean there's there's there's actually an example

1:30:35

against what you're just saying which is which is modern-day china modern day china has a lot of capitalistic

1:30:43

economic policies in hong kong not even hong kong in a lot of a lot of mainland china uh i mean that that's

1:30:50

part part of why their economy is doing so well they have capitalism as an

1:30:55

economic system but communism as a government system right so like you you could trade you

1:31:02

could you know you own your ideas you know you can copyright them and you know it's capitalism right like you you

1:31:08

free market in for the world a citizen could do that a regular citizen that's my understanding how does that however

1:31:19

they still control the ideas there's still only one party you still can't speak out against the party money

1:31:25

that you make has to stay in china i don't know about that people

1:31:31

but if you're one of the capitalists that are making all this money and you're able to have the trade why would you leave china

1:31:37

and i think wouldn't you leave china because then you would just have your money and then just [ __ ] split

1:31:43

and then that's it i mean there's a certain amount of um that nationalism is involved too right

1:31:49

but you're telling me that the communist part of the government is not controlling to a degree what these capitalists can do

1:31:55

they control it if it's against the government and the party if it's just to make money yeah

1:32:02

that's my understanding like they actually call them free economic zones and a lot of a lot of china is i think

1:32:09

just mostly hong kong there's maybe beijing shanghai

1:32:19

i could be wrong it could be completely wrong i could be completely wrong folks zones

1:32:24

please if i'm wrong let me know like subscribe comment all right and this is going to be in china these oh

1:32:30

they call it special economic zones refers to seven zones shenzhen [Music]

1:32:38

i'm not gonna

1:32:45

[Music]

1:32:52

these are big areas and these are like provinces and there's i don't know what 15 provinces in china 20 i don't know but like these are not small areas

1:32:59

and so in these special economic zones it's capitalism but how big is the economic zone within

1:33:05

those areas this is let's look at the map of them uh a map showing the locations of the

1:33:12

special economic zones actually compared to the rest compared to the country i think it's these guys right here i don't know but i

1:33:18

don't know what the population is it might be the majority i don't know uh it's it's on the coast well that is the

1:33:24

thing the majority of even though china go back to the map even though china has a very large i think the the largest

1:33:29

population in the world the majority of the population is along the coastline and the the the more inland you go the

1:33:35

the far the fewer people they are let's double check that then that that'll be less than most people

1:33:43

china live coast

1:33:51

population 60 live in the 12 coastal provinces okay and so the special so once again on

1:33:57

the coast once again folks dominic was right so about who's right or who's wrong okay

1:34:05

it's about being precise and being wrong and right being righteous is not the same thing as being precise

1:34:12

and i was precisely right being precise is not the same thing as being right so special economic zones

1:34:18

meant most of them actually all of them are along the coast right and my my hypothesis was right that most

1:34:24

people live along the coast sixty percent of population i was the one who said that i said they live along most of we have a video we do most of the

1:34:32

population in china live in the coastal area the farther inland you go the less people there are i just said that we had

1:34:38

video evidence you did say that but my statement before that i believe was but i wonder if more people live on the

1:34:44

coast you're like yes they do okay so we were both right okay but neither of us was precise okay

1:34:52

okay i think i think with that this was march 22nd tuesday tuesday

1:34:59

march 22nd 2022 i'm charles hughes and i'm dominic leong this was rock your brain podcast

1:35:06

you guys take care like subscribe comment share buy merch and sponsor us

1:35:13

take care guys