We Agree with the Left Leaning Justices Arguments Re: Trump's Immunity Wish | Scrood | Show 20

Left leaning justices ask the right questions and 3 of the 6 Federalist, Uber Pub, right wing justices flail with arms outstretched, seeking a life jacket for Trump, and so called future presidents. Ridiculous rhetoric. Black robe Chatty Kathy dolls. 

Ben Scrood and Elly Stone are the hosts of the Scrood podcast at Scrood FM.

Transcript

Ben: 0:00

Supreme Court Oral Arguments, Trump Immunity. Today, Supreme Court heard oral arguments. If Trump has presidential immunity, for his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss to current President Joe Biden,

Elly: 0:19

Okay,

Ben: 0:21

They already know he put forward efforts to overthrow the election.

Elly: 0:24

Yeah. And false electors. Yeah. Illegal. And he was staging

Ben: 0:29

a

Elly: 0:29

coup.

Ben: 0:30

Yes.

Elly: 0:31

Illegal.

Ben: 0:31

So what's the difference ? He was the president or after the presidency or while he's the president or while the president was using the bathroom. It doesn't matter.

Elly: 0:40

No, their crimes are crimes.

Ben: 0:41

Yes. For his efforts. In overturning his 2020 election loss to current President Joe Biden, that should be enough right there.

Elly: 0:52

Mm hmm.

Ben: 0:53

Oh man. The U. S. courts of appeals have already found that Trump does not have presidential immunity. This was February 6th of 2024. Trump took it all the way to the Supreme Court.

Elly: 1:06

Right.

Ben: 1:08

They already know he's already committed crimes against the American people we don't know everything he's done illegal We will never know everything.

Elly: 1:15

He's staged a coup.

Ben: 1:16

Yes.

Elly: 1:17

False electors.

Ben: 1:18

Yes.

Elly: 1:19

Illegal documents.

Ben: 1:20

What is going on? Trump argues he is immune because he was president when he took these actions.

Elly: 1:27

I want to step in here finally, finally, the Supremes says something that makes absolute sense.

Ben: 1:34

Yes.

Elly: 1:34

A left wing Supreme, not a Federalist right wing Uber pub. Of course, She brought up the question, Why does it matter whether the crime is committed by a president during a presidency or by a president or ex president after a presidency?

Ben: 1:51

Exactly.

Elly: 1:53

She brought up to Trump's lawyer that assassinating an opponent is a personal even if he's president at the time, it? Isn't because he's saving the country , there's terrorists that he has to take down. He has said he wanted to take down his enemies and his opponent assassinate them. questioning him about why is that not a crime if he's president? In office which is what Trump's lawyer is arguing,

Ben: 2:21

Mr. Sauer

Elly: 2:22

yeah, she's

Ben: 2:22

arguing,

Elly: 2:23

It doesn't matter if it's personal or presidential. A crime is a crime. Our Constitution says nothing

Ben: 2:29

about presidential immunity for a criminal act

Elly: 2:33

a crime.

Ben: 2:36

The justices raised hypothetical examples of presidential wrongdoing, such as selling nuclear secrets.

Elly: 2:45

He'll probably do that.

Ben: 2:48

He talked about the subs, ordered a coup,

Elly: 2:51

did that

Ben: 2:52

political assassinations like you're speaking of opponents

Ethan: 2:55

TRUMP WANTED to do that...

Ben: 2:57

or even taking a bribe.

Elly: 2:58

probably did that

Ben: 3:00

Now wait a minute. That is all wrong. It doesn't matter if you're the president. It doesn't matter if you're the person at the drive through window. It doesn't matter if you're a mechanic. It doesn't matter. Right.

Elly: 3:11

He's already guilty of a coup. He's already guilty of fake electors.

Ben: 3:16

Exactly.

Elly: 3:17

He's already guilty of conspiracy in more than one state. We've got people in Michigan, Georgia, and now Arizona just today have been indicted for crimes.

Ben: 3:28

They were indicted. 11 people were indicted today. In Arizona for the fake electors. The ones in Arizona that were indicted, a couple of them are Congress people or state, state representatives. Yes. They're still holding seats. Yes. This is absolutely crazy. The Supreme Court has to listen to this waste the time. They heard hours of oral arguments today I want to say again, that our more left wing moderate. Supreme Court judges, arguing,, There's no such thing in a defense of presidential immunity for a criminal act, and throwing it into a presidential act, rather than a criminal personal act, is not going to save his ass. she also said That he is making this personal with wanting to assassinate his opponents or assassinate anyone who Or to bring in the National Guard or bring in the military to take over. the Trump lawyer was bringing some ridiculous arguments, about Ulysses Grant and what he did after the civil war She basically said the crime's the crime whether it's personal or presidential they already know he's already committed crimes against the American people we don't know everything he's done illegal We will never know everything. That's right. This is absolutely crazy. The Supreme Court has to listen to this waste the time. They heard hours of oral arguments today over something that is a crime. Efforts to overturn 2020 election This is absolutely Scrood. We started Scrood to fight corruption in politics and big business. Help the cause and share our content. Let's take him down. Let's take em' down. Subscribe free on Spotify, Apple podcast, or where you listen. Watch on Youtube@ScroodFM. Let's stick together. Let's take em' down.