Politically High-Tech

224- Revolutionizing Content Creation with AI: Stefan Fehr on Quality, Affordability, and Future Impacts

Elias Marty Season 6 Episode 14

Send us a text

Ready to revolutionize your content creation? Join us as we sit down with Stefan Fehr, the visionary founder of Modern IQs, who has been making waves in the tech industry since 2019. Stefan shares his game-changing AI-driven tools designed to outperform general-purpose AI like ChatGPT, emphasizing the power of single-purpose tools for superior performance. Learn how his mission to simplify content creation can boost your website traffic and reduce the time required to produce high-quality blog articles.

We also tackle the tricky balance between maintaining premium content quality and affordability. Inspired by models like MrBeast, Stefan discusses strategies to offer exceptional content while incorporating free giveaways. Discover the importance of customer trust, consistent quality, and the cost-saving potential of in-house solutions for quality assurance. This conversation is packed with insights for anyone looking to elevate their content game without breaking the bank.

Safety and ethics in AI development are more crucial than ever. We explore the proactive stance of the European Union versus the slower adaptation in the United States. Through humorous anecdotes, like a Thanksgiving prayer gone wrong, Stefan highlights the need for clear communication and intentional AI use. We wrap up by envisioning AI's future impact on business, marketing, and politics, including its potential to revolutionize government spending and even pay citizens. Don't miss this engaging discussion on the practical applications of AI and why staying relevant in the job market means embracing these advancements.

Follow Stefan Fehr at

Twitter

https://x.com/StefanFehrAC

His Linkedin Article are AI Rapid Advancement Warning

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/stefan-fehr_i-never-say-this-but-this-should-be-shared-activity-7209446925664665600-p_6l?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

His website

ModernIQs.com

Support the show

Follow your host at

YouTube and Rumble for video content

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUxk1oJBVw-IAZTqChH70ag

https://rumble.com/c/c-4236474

Facebook to receive updates

https://www.facebook.com/EliasEllusion/

Twitter (yes, I refuse to call it X)

https://x.com/politicallyht

Speaker 1:

Welcome everyone to Politically High Tech with your host Elias. I have a guest here. Yes, I love that this podcast is coming more international. Don't get me wrong. I focus mostly in America because that's the country I have most knowledge in, where I've lived for my entire life. But I don't mind bringing in international people. Variety is the spice of life, even at times I talk about foreign politics. I think it's interesting that we need to know about indirect impact on us. Whether you realize it or not, you might realize why the heck your banana is more expensive there's a political problem with that or why your electronics is taking a long time to get there.

Speaker 1:

Politics affects so many things, but this is not going to be as political. Politics is going to be at the very, very backdrops. Probably that minor detail if you have that, that picture that you realize, that very small detail maybe you have to look at the picture probably a thousandth time. That's how far back politics is going to be. What's going to be the forefront is more technology than business. That's going to be the main detail. That's going to be. What's going to be the forefront is more technology than business. That's going to be the main detail. That's going to be the star and the focus of this episode. So the robots are going to be the front. The political, spiritual stuff is going to be in the back. They're important, but, trust me, I've dived enough that you can check the other episodes and I want to be respectful of mine and the guests' time as well. Okay, let's just be clear. So I have a guest here who is not just an early adopter, also a businessman. I think it's definitely safe to call you a businessman.

Speaker 1:

He has a product that could challenge chat GBT. Yeah, if you could believe that. You know, a lot of us just think that's the be-all, end-all, the best thing, right, because we just know it, just because it's the most known product. This is my opinion too. It's not always the best one, it's just the most known because of the news and the coverage. Yes, mainstream media rigs influence us and says thank you, just because that's so much coverage. And I like simpler, sometimes only one function or double function AI. An AI that try to be all not as good, you just stretch out your quality and it gets kind of dulled out. An AI that specializes on one or two things. They normally do their job much better because they got a certain focus Right. I mean, yeah, he's right. Now, that means there's agreement there. At least I'm not speaking nonsense, I'm not going crazy. Um, there's agreement there. At least I'm not speaking nonsense, I'm not going crazy. That's good. But enough of my yammering, I'm gonna introduce this guest. His name is, as a stefan memories, or stefan it's both.

Speaker 1:

It's both, okay, yeah no, no, it's your name. I gotta get it right, at least once stefan is totally fine stefan okay I'll call you stefan, all right.

Speaker 1:

Oh, damn to me that I must. I'm stripping myself when it comes to that. I gotta get that one all right. So he's gonna introduce himself and he has a lot of things. Well, yes, it's one article that we're gonna get to later that I think we need to pay attention to, and I actually agree, I thought about it. I didn't get to talk about it because I get distracted busy doing so many other things. But with that, stefan, what do you want the audience to know about you? What's your background, what do you do? And all that good stuff.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, yeah. So hey, my name is Stefan Fehr. I'm the founder of Modern IQs, and you made a really good point before, which is like one of my key points as well. Chatgpt is a general purpose tool, and I mean a large language model that does not have a clear direction is going to perform way worse than software that is, you know, having one purpose. This is what we're building as well. We are building tools that are super easy to use.

Speaker 2:

So we create, we have apps that help you create blog articles and, for the people that are not aware of you know, blog articles is stuff you read on the website when you, when you search for, you know, any kind of thing you want to, you know, want to find out on google, and we do this because, um, blog articles on average get 10 to a thousand times more traffic or website visitors than social media does.

Speaker 2:

And you know, I I started the whole tech thing in 2019, uh, using using ai apps, and, by the day, I put a lot of ai text on my old blog articles, on my old website.

Speaker 2:

The website really went up like, like almost from the same day, google just sent me a lot of traffic and back in the day I had four hours to create an article and I thought, well, if I get a better, if I can create a better app, because all the apps out there weren't good enough, and so I wanted to have an app which reduces this time to minutes. Because I figured, if I have four hours, so back in the day I had four hours to create an article, and those 69 articles on my website got a top reach of 130,000 a month. So 130,000 people saw my website on Google and I figured, if I only need minutes to create an article, I can scale this up to millions, right? So that's why I, you know, went and looked, looked out for good solutions that can do what I wanted to do, and I didn't find any.

Speaker 1:

So that's why we created all yep, and simplicity attracts, let me tell you. It attracts because we humans and this is going to go against well, no, it's not going to go against. It's going to kind of support the spiritual aspect. We humans are egotistical, lazy bees. We want something that's simple, that's going to do some of the thinking for us. The less clicks we need to do the action, the better. It is right. If you had to do 10 clicks, humans are going to be so overwhelmed, confused, frustrated. As opposed to one to three clicks, oh it's great, it's magical, it's easy, right, and I've talked to enough tech users to know that's definitely the case. And me, as a consumer, I could definitely support that because it's just a few clicks oh my goodness, that's great, as opposed to me figuring out 10 clicks. Okay, okay, adjust the setting oh, I did it, but I feel drained. I had to figure all this out, you know. So I I totally agree with that and, just like I said, chatting, we should try to be all, try to serve all. At the end of the day, we can only do so much you. That's why I look at AI tools that have more of one or two, maybe even three functions. At most, they tend to do that job. Text to video, I focus on that. They put all their, of course, language models and all the functionality just to make your words come to life. It creates a visual picture or it becomes a video, which is amazing.

Speaker 1:

And blogs Talk about blogs. Oh man, I remember my early internet days. I was like in middle school, high school, I used to read blogs more than just chatting on social media. Social media was becoming, I mean, yeah, social media was more rare at that time, but yeah, people still do read Blogs. Don't say it's a boomer thing or obsolete thing. People still People like to read. Okay, so, those who don't trust as much, those who have a specific Niche interest, if you will, if that blog Could serve that, you're going to get that audience. That's really phenomenal. That's good stuff. You're getting me all interested. Anything else, you need to know more about Modern IQs, about what it does.

Speaker 2:

Well, let's say it like that got.

Speaker 2:

indeed, you know, mr beast right yes, oh yeah so I got inspired by mr beast and giving away stuff for free. And since I had like a really tough time with my entrepreneurship uh, with, you know, getting my getting my company out into the public and getting people to know my company I thought about a new mission. So we had this idea to give away one free article a month and you know, so that is for entrepreneurs and founders, or basically for anyone who is going to visit the new platform which is coming out in a week, basically for anyone who is going to visit the new platform which is coming out in a week. So in a week you can go on modernIQscom and you can just enter the headline of the blog article, enter your email so we can send it somewhere, and then press create and the thing will be sent to your email, but doing this for free and then with MrBeast.

Speaker 2:

So the long-term goal is that, uh, we create, we, we get the prices down of all the very. So we do a lot of operations in the background, like you know automated plagiarism checks and stuff like that that you, you know, don't don't run into legal issues, or google really doesn't like plagiarized sentences, so, and this is like stuff people usually would need to do by hand, but they don't do because they are too lazy or they don't have enough time, so they don't do it. And this is why our quality, because of all these steps, our quality is higher than normal, and with the quality obviously comes the ranking, and with the quality obviously comes the ranking. And so what we, what our long-term goal is that we can get the prices of all these uh, quite you know, um expensive operations down so that everybody can everybody who's starting a company can create 10 free blog articles a month so that they have, you know, like a really good, this is going to 10, 10 super high quality blog articles for your website monthly are going to do a big job in helping you get customers. So, as a reference, just to say that one of the reasons why we created Modern IQs is Healthlinecom, and so what they do?

Speaker 2:

Do you know Healthlinecom? Oh, no, for sure. Yeah, interesting. So so I'm always asking this because they actually get 200 million monthly website visitors only by creating super high quality blog articles. So they don't spend advertising money, they just create blog articles 200 million a month. And it's interesting to ask these people because 200 million is a considerable part of the world population. So yeah, but this is the long-term goal. So we're trying to get the quality up to Healthline standard, so the maximum quality possible, and then get the prices down so that we can give away 10 free articles per month.

Speaker 1:

That'd be great, not just for even the loyal customers that helped you in the beginning, but even the attractive and new ones. Oh wow, 10 track-binding articles a month. So it's a win-win, because normally some of the business deals is oh, only for new customers only. The owners are like, eh, that's okay, they just deal with whatever pricing, and they eventually be scared to do it with the same crappy pricing. I mean, that's sad. That's what a lot of businesses do, including some websites and all of that, unless you use coupons. Well, yeah, that includes using coupons.

Speaker 2:

Let me just say that that's not Mr Beast style, you know.

Speaker 1:

Oh, no, no that's the opposite. That's corporate America style if you will, yeah you know, yeah, that's opposite of Mr Beast, for sure. Yeah, you know, mr Beast style.

Speaker 2:

I'm sure he has businesses where you have to pay for it, but he also does a lot of prize giveaways, a lot of freebie give giveaway as well, so he does that fine balance. I don't know how that works even I would think that's crazy but it works for him. It totally works for him. I mean he's very successful. Yeah, look he. I mean he's, he's investing all the money into the videos again and this is why the content explodes in quality. It's, it's quite obvious.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, oh, for sure to against that. You are showing great signs of mental illness. Let me just say that for real, anyone wants to argue against that? Oh, Mr B's video is low quality. Oh, no, no, no, no, no.

Speaker 2:

You don't know low quality.

Speaker 1:

I could share you videos of 2005, 2007.

Speaker 1:

That was just homemaking and all that. That's low quality. It may have a charm to it, but it's still low quality. Pixels, what they were saying, all that good, so that's low quality. It may have a charm of realism, but we're not talking about charm. We're not talking about authenticity. We talk about quality, and I like some of mr v's videos, by the way.

Speaker 1:

I blame the guests for forcing me to admit that, by the way, but no, it's okay, he's, he's. He's a great content creator. I personally like him. I'm gonna get I'm gonna get flack for some of the youtube community. I personally like him. I'm going to get flack for some of the YouTube community. I personally like him more than PewDiePie. Pewdiepie used to be the biggest thing, but I was not much of a fan of him. But MrBeast is high quality. He does get better and better and better. He doesn't stay there. He could have just been chill. He could have done well with that, but no, he always wants to get to the next level, next level, next level so, and that's that's like the thing, right.

Speaker 2:

So so, founders and entrepreneurs, it's. It's just such a hustle to get your company to you know to, to get it to people to know them, to know you, and this is why it was such a hustle for me. And luckily, my product is marketing, so why not give it away, like I mean, look, there's like the business model is pretty easy as well. If you get like the people that you know, if you create blog articles and they get you nothing, you're obviously not going to pay, but the higher the quality of the articles, the more chances are that they are going to rank. And if they are ranking, you want to scale your company fast and you see that it's working for you, so you might as well just buy a couple of hundred more, right? So it's a pretty easy task, though, yeah.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, results equals more money, and they're going to put it right back. So, okay, this website helps me. I'm going to definitely put more and invest yeah, I mean before you know yeah yeah.

Speaker 1:

So it's just, you know, article that sounds, sounds credible or has great knowledge or treasure, but by the time you try to apply it how you feel cheated. So I don't want to go back to that. Oh, there you go. You just ruined the relationship right there and the cash flow with that. So, you know, get customers' trust and all that's very important and he's already saying that by having high quality. So I like where this is going. Is that all? Let's get going? Just 10 articles, you know, because they're people say like this, interesting, it's 10 articles. You know it's not your quality or content. All that, yeah, go ahead.

Speaker 2:

I'm just, I'm just, I'm just saying we're not at the place where we can, you know, globally give away 10 free articles, because right now we, like an article is I mean even the, even plagiarism checks and some stuff like that is like very expensive and we do a lot like we're doing like around a hundred of those steps. So and you know, with every step you do, the quality you know gets level up and then the chances for the rank are higher. But you know, right now, for example, we're doing plagiarism checks externally and, uh, once we have like scale, we can, you know, develop systems in-house so that prices go down.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, yeah, in general, in-house services just cost much cheaper. That's just a fact. Um, it doesn't matter if it's a physical business, digital business, that's just the same rule that applies. And I would just say, yeah, just to be clear and I like his emphasize that he only could give at least what one free article as of now. Right, just to be clear about that. Yeah, a month I mean, but that's his goal to get there, you know, you give him enough freebies and still, you know, sustain, profitability and all that.

Speaker 2:

You know, one article a month is still going to be enough for. So if you have a website and if you don't blog, google is not going to recognize you. But if you blog once a month, then Google at least sees all right, there's something happening there. And only by blogging once a month you will be recognized more by Google. So this is the current, you know, the current Mr B status, and by having it up to 10, we'll definitely, you know, increase chances, because not every article is going to rank. It's impossible, yeah.

Speaker 1:

No, I'm taking that. No, that's very important. So, for those of you who have online business, pay attention, pay attention, all right, just pay attention.

Speaker 2:

And it's not taking any time, and you know it's like you enter the headline, you press create and that's it. That used to be. And just to say this as well, this would be 20 hours of work without AI and four hours of work with ChatGPT. So what you're doing there in 10 seconds takes four hours with ChatGPT.

Speaker 1:

So, yeah, I hear that, sam Altman, it may sound like a challenge or a threat to you, but hey, the digital landscape is ever changing. You're not going to be the king forever. You'll be dethroned one day, I guarantee it. Don't worry, it lasts forever, I'm sure he's a good guy, but you know.

Speaker 2:

Oh yeah, we're only doing blog articles. So there's no, no, there's, like. This is like I don't know a thousandth of a percent of what OpenAI is doing and going to do. So yeah, this is a special purpose app.

Speaker 1:

I'm going to say it. They're stretching themselves thin, okay, yeah, and look, that's why certain AI tools are going to last long, because they specialize in what they do. Chat GPT was good. It did open up AI to everyone. I got to give them that credit. It made AI much more public. I mean, I can't take that away from them.

Speaker 1:

As a fact, I mean, I started using AI early 2020. You use it 2019. And I have like a semi-tech background, that's like a secondary background. But I was so curious about the potential of ai and I was amazed by it when it was at three and now, of course, it's like at what four? At this point, four is exponentially greater. I could imagine what five?

Speaker 1:

maybe it'll suck into a computer high screen, I don't know, I don't know what's gonna do, but I think that'll be creepier. There'll be a lot of you know what I'll call it a lot of risk safety concerns. I love the fact that you checked for plagiarism, because New York Times have sued because they do jail diligence. You heard of New York Times, I'm pretty sure, because they're pretty well known, even globally. Let's just say it's New York, which is my city, by the way. Um, but yeah, but I love that it checks for that because, yeah, you may get an easy result, but if they catch that plagiarism you're in deep trouble. But yeah, yeah, go ahead. That's all I'm gonna say. I like that part of chicken plagiarism.

Speaker 2:

Well, yeah, so, yeah, the risky stuff, right, this is why I created this post on LinkedIn. So this is what I realized. So this is something which I'm talking about currently. Which I'm talking about currently. So it needs to be clear and people should be very aware of the fact that from the day when we got to know ChatGPT till today is half the time that has already passed till we have AGI and I know about.

Speaker 2:

So let me just quickly so for those in the audience that don't know AGI is basically there's a lot of misconceptions. So AGI is a lot talked about like the one trillion times more intelligent than all of humans kind of thing, but that's not true. Agi is an AI that is capable. It's always like as capable as a human with like any part of intelligence. So we're not talking about, we're not just talking about you know writing text. We're talking about like figuring out things, you know reasoning, getting better by yourself and this kind of stuff.

Speaker 2:

So basically, um, and placed into a robot, we're talking about a robot that has human capability of doing things, anything in 2026. So that means since the launch of chachipitil today, which is like not even two years, we are half the time the way till we will have robots that have almost our capability of doing things, and that's not not not going to be like millions of them, but I think that the number will rise to a lot. Probably it's. It's very likely that there's going to be way more robots on the planet than humans if in 20 years. So this is one of the reasons why I wanted to talk about this with like we should be right now where we are and that people are aware that this is happening extremely fast, and think about what should we do next, how would we handle the situation, and so on.

Speaker 1:

And I think that's very important to look at, because I've thought about this and said this AI technology is advancing so quick that it's even surpassing human intelligence or even our rate to adapt, and that is such a profound point I just thought about internally, but I just there you get the time to talk about it. So I'm actually happy that you're bringing this, trying to bring this to the forefront, because I think that's something that needs to be definitely looked at, because it's just true advancement. Human adaptability is like going. It's like going up, up, up, up, trying to be zoomed. It's like a this is going to sound real crazy. It's like a dying snail versus a rabbit with a rocket-fueled jetpack. Okay, that's how crazy you're talking about here. Okay, it sounds a little crazy, but robots are going to be just beyond these. You know the text, data, models that we know they're going to do things, or at least they figure it out. So that's critical thinking, sentient, even Aware of their existence. That's where things are going to get very, very interesting, this whole sentient concept of it, and they're going to be doing a whole bunch of stuff. They're probably flying, delivering food and all that.

Speaker 1:

But some might realize why am I doing this work for these lazy human beings. There's not going to, you know. But then again, that's why I need checks and balances, because if we let this thing go too far without being conscious, or have some what do you call it Something just to keep it safe or prevent it, if it gets to that level, I don't think we fully prevent it. We have a safety switch or something. Hopefully that will work, I don't know To get to advance. They might even outsmart that system. I don't want to bring any fears and stuff, but I think that's just something that we have to think about. This is why we need laws and policies and some overseers. You know, let's make sure that the product addresses safety concerns, not just ethical concerns, even safety concerns as well. You already talked about ethics with plagiarism and this is like a safety concern. Just in case, I don't know, a robot crashes into someone's apartment or something like that because of an error. Oof, scary.

Speaker 2:

So I could talk a lot about extremely positive and extremely risky negative things. One thing is for sure there is going to be a lot of change coming, and I'm pretty sure that you're very aware of how slow our system is moving and how slow it can adapt. I mean, democracy is slow. You have to get everybody to the table and agree to something that's taking forever and in the future, it's to something that's taking forever. And, uh, in the in the future, it's not possible that things take forever. This is it's just simply not possible. So if we can agree on something that is definitely that there's a lot of change coming, no matter how, which direction, but we, we gotta have, you know, uh, we gotta have systems that that can react quickly, you know so.

Speaker 1:

So that's something um, let me add on that. That's for real, I like. I like that. We need a more nimble, efficient, agile kind of government. Yep, and I gotta give the european union more credit. They are trying to do something with ai. America has been slow with a lot of the debates and the arguments you said getting everybody to the table. Half the people in government only want to talk to each other because of different political affiliations. I'm just putting it that simple. That's definitely contributing to the delay when America starts to see pass laws. You only think about A, b, c. We're not thinking about the whole alphabet. We try to act quick. I could criticize very good that I got to give the European users. They at least try to come up with some regulations with AI already before fully that part. I got to say I'm sure you have more insight to add on on the European part. That one I got to say there's been some policies on that that say, oh look, they tried to do something.

Speaker 2:

I was just thinking about that. R&d in this case, r&d in science is research and development and in politics is Republicans and Democrats. There's like a gap, you know, anyways. Well, so the thing is uh, look what. What we are doing at modern iqs is running at the maximum. Some of the tasks we are doing are maxing out the possibility of what ai can do today, and the thing is so okay, we have one click app that is super user-friendly and if you that is very task specific, okay, so for the tasks we do with people can do with our app, you need four hours with ChatGPD. That means that at the current level of what AI can do today, it can be a thousand times more efficient than an employee using ChatGPT I'm not talking about. So what's happening right now is companies are trying to get their employees using AI with Copilot and so on, and they're trying to, you know, train. And if you ask CEOs, the first thing they answer is their stuff is not trained to use AI and therefore it's hard to implement.

Speaker 2:

But the thing is, if we demand, we can do two things. If we demand, we can do two things. We can either improve AI's capabilities so that it is even easier to use. But then we introduce a lot of potential risk, you know, because it's going to be capable and it might can do the job, the process, what you're doing right now.

Speaker 2:

It can do it maybe 10 times better, but it'll be able to do everything at least 10 times better, probably this. Well, this is amplified, so a million times better, right, so? So this is the one side, the what this is, the lazy human side saying I don't want to learn anything, just let the machine do it. But um, on the other hand side, if we demand software companies to create super simple solutions that are operating at the maximum positive potential what AI can do today, then we might don't even need to create more potent AI systems. The GPT-4 is an extremely potent system if you max it out and if you don't play around at the bottom 5% of what it can do. So the introduced risk of developing more potent AI I don't see a reason why we should do that.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, Especially if humans don't want to learn. You know, and that's my criticism. Listen, yeah, still maintain intelligence. Make sure you're intentional with the use of AI. Don't let AI think for you. You think, you know, because AI has its own little mind. You know, if you try to do one thing, it'll do another thing. I mean me I'm going to. This is going to sound so repetitive, but it's a hilarious example.

Speaker 1:

When I was doing prayer on the table for Thanksgiving, I wasn't very clear. You know what result I got? I had a cooked turkey. Doing a prayer. I laughed so hard. It was so comically wrong that I kept it. I put the outro, the episode of thanksgiving. I said this is what I get for for just being lazy and quick and not being clear about what I want. So I kept it as a comical lesson about being more conscious and even you know, even go through a little bit of trial and error, so just being in a rush. But it was so hilarious that I just kept it there. It's a comical lesson for me and for those of you who saw it.

Speaker 1:

I'm sure you might have some pity, or it might be horrifying some of you. I didn't take that to Turkey. I'm sure you might have some pity or it might be horrifying some of you. Like the turkey, the only human thing about it was the little prayer hands. It was praying not to be killed and cooked, but obviously it got cooked. God had an answer, so I think the atheists will have a good time With that one.

Speaker 1:

I'm a Christian too, so Sadly, I didn't do my Christian Community very well on that one. Oh, forgive me, forgive me, grace, grace, grace. You know. So sadly, I didn't do my Christian community very well on that one. Oh, forgive me, forgive me, grace, grace, grace, you know. But let me get back to the topic at hand. You know, just bring that point that. You know. You got to just learn. You know, just like learning old things, you got to give it time, you got to allow some trial and error when it comes to using AI. You know, and that's all I'm going to say, and I'm sure you have insight to add to this what do you believe are, I'll say, one of the most important skills when using AI technology?

Speaker 2:

Well, you got to do it, I mean. So it depends, right, if we're talking about large language models like ChatGPT, in my opinion it's like getting used to it. So in the beginning I didn't really know what to do. I didn't know almost nothing to do with it. You know, I was like what kind of task, what can it help me with? And now I'm using it for coding.

Speaker 2:

I'm using it for you know, using it for you know, amplifying any kind of so, for example, what we're doing. So I hear this a lot, obviously that uh, uh, but is your content helpful? You know, isn't it just a copy of something? And, for example, so, um, so what I'm using ai mostly for is I have an idea, I have some interesting thought in my head and I want to get this out into the world. So I'm telling the system and this is our specialized system I'm telling it the headline, and then I'm telling it there's another field where you can enter background information. And so I'm telling it and this is something for the audience, if you want to create content and you have a content idea, whatever kind, it is right tell the system, write, for example, an article around this idea, and then you would describe the idea.

Speaker 2:

So the AI is not. This is a way of funneling the AI into writing what you wanted to write about, and then you know so AI. So you have an idea and the AI is going to produce content around the idea. You know it's enriching it, so for me, the idea still comes from me and the AI is more like a. You know it's enriching it, so for me, the idea still comes from me and the AI is more like, you know, very potent version of me typing, so that's something I recommend. So, for example, so instead of you know writing 20 hours or four hours, with ChatGPT, you can, you know, listen to podcasts, learn and create more creative ideas, develop more ideas and then create more interesting content or do whatever with your time and if, for some reason, you don't have time to listen to the entire podcast, have an AI that could generate show notes.

Speaker 1:

Okay, this is what it's generally about. That's the one AI I use. That's something I got comfortable using. I said, oh, this is actually really good, and of course I check for grammatical errors or extra context that it doesn't recognize. Yeah, just add those parts in, Like episode number I put it in somewhere and probably a few things that you know. I don't expect the AI processes as a catch yet, you know. So there's some things you still got to keep in mind, and always processes as a catch, yet you know.

Speaker 1:

So there's some things you still got to keep in mind and always double check, verify. I think you said the most potent thing sometimes. So simple learn, just learn. That's a very valuable skill and, and I'm going to say this again, if you want to say bye-bye to ai, you're eventually going to say bye-bye to job. Bye-bye AI. Oh, okay, bye-bye job.

Speaker 1:

It's very likely that this is very true, you'll be lucky you could endure two years Lucky Two years without knowing much AI. But remember, eventually it's either going to be immediate, like some companies, or it's going to take longer, like probably two, three years, but eventually you're going to go bye-bye. You are stubborn. They're going to see you as a stubborn dinosaur that cannot serve the company well, I know it's harsh to hear that. I know some of you may say I'm insensitive, but you know what the real world has to do these so-called harsh decisions just to see their growth or they want to optimize and it's hard for you to find another job. But you got to use AI because it's spreading across all industries.

Speaker 1:

Some faster than others, but it's spreading.

Speaker 2:

I mean, look, let's be a little bit rational. I mean, look, let's be a little bit rational. If somebody in the audience, if you don't like AI, are you using a computer? Because I mean, this is a new technology as well, right, and it actually. I mean, just think about it. So that's something maybe interesting for the audience as well. I'm hearing this a lot that people are scared to lose their job. But the thing is, since machines do our work, we got a lot richer. I mean, our houses got bigger, our cars got bigger, everything got bigger. You know, our supermarket shelves got bigger, like way bigger. And just think about if you would not use a computer, do the calculation, calculations the computer does yourself. Good luck, I mean it's. It's quite irrational to say there's a new thing and I I I just don't like it because it's new, but I'm using all the new things. I mean I'm I'm listening to a podcast right now. It's like very you. It's a little bit of a mismatch, I would say.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, and well, I could say cognitive dissonance, if I'm going to use a psychological word, or just if I'm going to use the harsh word hypocrisy. It's hypocrisy right there, because you're using a computer and we've been. Look, ai has been around for decades, even before the open AI thing became anything.

Speaker 1:

And I would use a video game example. You know that computer-pulling way to play the game. This AI function's in there. It's generating the text, the characters you don't play as, or even some of the functions your character do. All that's AI, okay. So AI's been around. You know chatbots. That's been around even before open AI. So some of you may not realize it, but you've been dealing with AI. You just haven't been getting the connection together. You know You've been dealing with AI.

Speaker 1:

So you know that's a very good point. And just to make it rational, see, he's very rational, see, he has a healthy nuance. So he does fit one of the core statements of this podcast have a healthy, nuanced perspective of AI, know its potential, greatness and danger. At the same time, encourage people to use and ask the exact perspective of this podcast. So it's slightly biased, it gears towards like an AI, but it's also aware of the plagiarism.

Speaker 1:

And let me add another one Besides just written blog plagiarism, copyrighted music, oh, music industries of the artists, because some of them are losing money and America is a very corporate country and they will move in that direction If enough powerful voices Would say, yeah, ban that or limit An AI audio tool Like Udio. You know they are getting in trouble For that because a lot of it is Telling them okay, do a remix Of the new Eminem song. He's a very big name in America, a Caucasian rapper. They can have a beat that's Very similar. But Artists, they're very sensitive To their sounds, they know their beats. So they're gonna say, hey, wait a minute, they got a remix Of my music and I'm not getting royalties for it, you're taking money away from me. So they're seen as theft and there's already a push for it right now, as we speak. I don't know when it's going to officially materialize, but I'm pretty sure it's going to materialize. It's a matter of when, it's not an if it's going to happen at some point.

Speaker 2:

Look just so, maybe to give an outlook on something. Let's imagine the little bit closer future where you, let's assume you're young, you're walking into a club, you want to dance, right, and there's music playing and in the near future, you're going to have, you know, your mobile or something. Something's going to tell the local system this is the kind of music I like and then. So what's happening is that the music is AI generated and it'll adapt to you know what people like most, so you know it'll bring styles in. You know it'll switch to you know to have, so it'll know 50 people in the room like this style the most. This is where we're playing electronic music, but 50 people like this style the most, and so it'll switch.

Speaker 2:

In the more distant future, you will have an AI that is like an assistive layer around your brain and that AI will be able to, so you will not hear the same music as everybody else. You will hear something similar and but it'll be adjusted more to what you like. So you'll enjoy it way more and everybody will enjoy it way more, because the AI is able to create a song or beats or whatever, and adjust in real time to every single person there. It's going to be such a better time, so there's a lot of stuff that can be way better.

Speaker 1:

I love how he's balanced the positivity. I was talking about robots finding oppressors and accidentally crashing into a part of a bilious armor. That's a nice balance to it and I can even add even medicines. Maybe they'll tailor medicines that's more compatible with DNA. That's the positive thing.

Speaker 2:

I'm sure you've heard that before. Well, my partner is a structural biology scientist, and so there's actually very recently we've been talking about this actually this morning that whole, you know know, genomic treatment process is is in some ways now reduced from decades to minutes, and, and and you will in the future, you'll probably have some treatment within minutes or hours delivered to you. That is specific for your, for you as a single person, and it'll it'll help you instantly. You know, this is crazy. It's probably going to advance our lifespan by hundreds of years.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, you know, it's a possibility. You could live 150, maybe even 200 years. Some people might not want to live that long. Well, I'm not going to give you solutions for that. This is not the type of podcast for that and I don't want to be accused of encouraging a certain act. Okay, but we're going to live longer, okay.

Speaker 1:

Especially with healthcare improvements. I mean you can't, and that would be great. Maybe we'd be younger and longer, and when we hit that stage you'll be there longer too. I think that would be great. Maybe you know we'd be younger and longer, and when we hit that stage you'll be there longer too you know, I think that would be good.

Speaker 2:

I'm sorry, go ahead our kids won't get sick. I mean who doesn't? Want that.

Speaker 1:

Oh yeah, if I have a have a, maybe a pill, or maybe even a drink or something that eradicates that and maybe even two other future diseases that come, because it's preventative. You can go that route too. Very preventative. Ok, cold catches up, kill the virus before you form, or whatever. Look, there's so many great possibilities, just like there are risks and some dangers which we're ready to become aware of, like deep fakes, unfortunately and I always go about functions. But for the most part, I think we're going in the right direction and I'm slowly becoming a constant optimist, not only an optimist when it's convenient. You know, just fight your fears. Fears is what's holding you back, basically rational fear is, like you know, just fight your fears.

Speaker 1:

Fears is what's holding you back. Basically, rational fear is, like you know, don't jump off the cliff or fight a bear. I'm not talking about that, but just try you know new things, things that's not you know. Don't be afraid of things that doesn't threaten your life.

Speaker 2:

Oh, yeah, totally Go ahead. I'm just saying we should slow down because there's no real with. With the current level we have in ai, our development globally will increase by at least 100x. So, um, I so this is gonna solve. You know this is gonna solve, like most of the even bigger problems very quickly. So, um, if it's if, if it's health care or you know whatever, um, so I would advise to, instead of you know developing uncontrollably, just kind of stop where we are and develop the systems to their maximum use case of what it can do today. And you know, then, very cautiously, go up. You know learn and you know, very cautiously, go up. You know learn and you know take, take slow steps going up yeah, I think that's.

Speaker 1:

I think that's wise and that's the approach I would normally say. I'm happy that you said it. See, it's not just me. I think if you're going to go up, we should go up cautiously, to where we have now.

Speaker 1:

Polish it, maximize it, optimize, perfect it, then we should move to the next level, because I do agree, Too much advancement. Even my politics, my centrist politics too much advancement freaks me out. That's the only part where he gets afraid of the way AI is advancing. Whatever you learned, probably two months ago, it's out the window. No, forget that One month ago. Forget that you got to do this now. Yeah, I think that's going to drive us crazy. As much as humans are amazing, we cannot adapt that quickly.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, that's something we're adapting really slow.

Speaker 1:

Compared to.

Speaker 2:

AI, yeah, and so this is a limiting factor and I mean it's like we've already witnessed this, right? So social media is a new system and it's like it's, it's not like so we, we throw it out into the world and now we're seeing, you know, a lot of negative consequences as well, and so, but I mean, social media is compared so so with with the potential negative effects. It's like tiny. I mean we can see with social media that a new technology can have negative effects. So with AI, we should be cautious about what we're doing.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, I agree. I think social media is the most practical example that an average person could get. They can understand the negative consequences, especially those you know your parents you have. The teenagers are addicted, have self-esteem issues. You know you compare it to the most beautiful, perfect people. You know some of the more dumb as heck. But I want to go on that rant. I already did enough rants attacking social media and its negative consequences, so I won't be repeating that here.

Speaker 1:

So before we wrap this up, let's do your shameless bucket. You already mentioned it multiple times. What's the website here again? Modern IQs, okay, and his article, the LinkedIn article, that has talked about this rapid advancement that our Sadly, we humans are not capable of catching up, especially with this uncontrolled, radically accelerating rate. I'm going to share those links as well because I think it's important for you to read. That's more like a supplement reading outside of this podcast, but it gives a little richer textual context, especially if you're a visual person. Some of you learn through visuals, some of you learn through sound, especially if you're a visual person. Some of you learn through visuals, some of you learn through sound and some of you just figure it out. It's like the three basic learnings. So is there anything you want to add before I wrap this up?

Speaker 2:

So, please, for all the entrepreneurs and founders in the audience, within the next probably week, we're gonna have our next platform and, if you go on, modern iqscom, just save yourself a lot of hustle and time and create one free article a month.

Speaker 1:

yeah hey, he's hustling, everybody has nothing wrong with it. Hey, I mean, that's a good pitch, audience, do it. I command you to do it. Let me be a dictator, a capitalist dictator.

Speaker 2:

Do it Sign up. In the end it wasn't even a lot of hustle building it, so please use it.

Speaker 1:

Right, I mean, just give it a try. Come on, you got to lose.

Speaker 2:

It's like a try Come on, come on.

Speaker 1:

What have you got to lose?

Speaker 2:

All right, it's like 10 seconds. You've got to lose like 10 seconds. Yeah, exactly.

Speaker 1:

Come on everyone. I've got 10 seconds. Even crazy busy people have 10 seconds. Come on, but you want growth, you'll make time for it, okay.

Speaker 2:

That to say anything else yeah, I know I mean about these topics when it comes to, you know, ai, marketing technology on business, and also, you know, the like, the effects on politics, and I mean that's something for an for another episode. Maybe ai is gonna, you know, be so productive productive that you know government spending will be reduced to almost zero and then you don't need to pay taxes anymore and if the government is even going to be productive, they will pay you money for being a citizen. That's maybe the future. That's the stuff I'm blogging about on LinkedIn and on X and on my website.

Speaker 1:

yeah, oh, that is such a good tease for a potential episode the best tease of a potential current guest, by the way. I gotta say that's an A right there. I gotta point that out because now he is telling me I want to come back. I got something interesting to talk about.

Speaker 2:

There's a lot of interesting stuff to talk about, especially effects on politics. Sometimes I remix the two together.

Speaker 1:

I mean, you have to be naive not to think they go together. Sometimes they really do go together and, who knows, we'll probably generate better laws much faster too. Definitely, definitely, speed up the democratic process. Sadly, authoritarian governments they adopt this technology faster, but they're very controlling about it. They spy on people and all that. So that's why they're adopting this AI use faster, in a sense, because they use it to control people, scan, make sure they're not doing anything bad. Oh, you bought something that attacks the dictator, but his point of view is up bad, this social credit score. So, sadly, the authoritarian governments are using it for evil purposes. So, from wherever you're listening to this podcast because we all spread all over the world you have a blessed day, afternoon or night. Thank you.

People on this episode