Dr. Samantha Brooks, world renown equine geneticist from the University of Florida joins us for a free ranging talk on how horses get their markers, how we might someday be able to breed for temperament and how even your temperament may predict how you experience pain. While we never really pick a topic, this is a great discussion on how gene's influence your horse's behavior.
Dr. Samantha Brooks, world renown equine geneticist from the University of Florida joins us for a free ranging talk on how horses get their markers, how we might someday be able to breed for temperament and how even your temperament may predict how you experience pain. While we never really pick a topic, this is a great discussion on how gene's influence your horse's behavior.
Kris Hiney: So I think I wanted just to do it broadly and try to relate, maybe like, where we at with horses compared to everybody getting their dogs, DNA, to see if, like his cousin lives down the road or like
35
00:05:42.303 --> 00:05:56.199
Kris Hiney: yes, or where are we? Do people need to pay money, and I don't wanna get off the track of yours. But I now like now they have, like you could get their microbiome tested, and you could do this like? Are we anywhere where all of this is
36
00:05:56.910 --> 00:05:58.170
Kris Hiney: helpful
37
00:05:58.760 --> 00:06:00.630
Kris Hiney: for the average horse owner.
38
00:06:03.050 --> 00:06:04.850
Samantha Brooks: For the average horse center. Okay.
39
00:06:05.150 --> 00:06:06.699
Kris Hiney: Is that kinda.
40
00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:12.070
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Let me think, just 1 s, because I
41
00:06:12.970 --> 00:06:14.850
Samantha Brooks: just gave this talk
42
00:06:15.582 --> 00:06:17.630
Samantha Brooks: a couple weeks ago.
43
00:06:17.770 --> 00:06:33.208
Samantha Brooks: And now I'm trying to remember. What did I talk about? But the whole topic was, I don't remember my own talk. But, this happens to me all the time. It's really fun. My like, my students bring me stuff. And they're like, look at this paper. And I'm like, Oh, that's really good! Who wrote it?
44
00:06:34.390 --> 00:06:34.929
Samantha Brooks: And then.
45
00:06:34.930 --> 00:06:36.385
Kris Hiney: And then it's you.
46
00:06:37.880 --> 00:06:42.041
Samantha Brooks: So I get to. It's fun. I get to rediscover my science all the time, cause I forget it. Now.
57
00:07:48.290 --> 00:07:51.270
Samantha Brooks: Alright. So the 3 topics that I picked
58
00:07:51.900 --> 00:07:58.099
Samantha Brooks: in stock horses was Pssm. One. And I just this morning took a look at the raw data. So we just did a
59
00:07:58.500 --> 00:08:07.799
Samantha Brooks: genetics topics survey of the general public. And that that's what I'm presenting on Sunday. So I was like, Oh, I guess I should probably do some, at least some summary statistics.
60
00:08:08.577 --> 00:08:24.472
Samantha Brooks: And we've got about 500 respondents, and about 200 of those were stock horse people, and I was really surprised to see that they are very concerned with PSSm. Type one and hYPP, and I don't know. I guess I thought hip was old news now, but
00:09:22.510 --> 00:09:24.176
Samantha Brooks: No, not 2,009, 2,000, and
76
00:09:26.500 --> 00:09:39.470
Samantha Brooks: it was 25 years after the discovery of the Allele. But in those 25 years it went from an allele frequency or an affected frequency of something like 20% to 59% in the halter horses.
77
00:09:39.939 --> 00:09:45.709
Samantha Brooks: So yes, they definitely use the tool in the wrong way. I guess I'm shocked that the
78
00:09:46.240 --> 00:09:48.550
Samantha Brooks: selective advantage is so strong.
79
00:09:48.550 --> 00:09:53.181
Kris Hiney: It is. They're freaks like, I, I guess. Have you been in a halter barn?
80
00:09:53.490 --> 00:09:56.879
Samantha Brooks: Oh, yes, I like sides of beef, sides of beef, and.
81
00:09:56.880 --> 00:09:57.480
Kris Hiney: Yeah.
82
00:09:57.480 --> 00:10:09.823
Samantha Brooks: We have this argument in our program all the time about marketability of stock horses. And you know, we everybody's got Ocd, we're no, we're no difference. And I'm like, Well, this is a solvable problem. Stop feeding them.
83
00:10:10.705 --> 00:10:32.670
Samantha Brooks: And and they're like, Yeah, if we do, if they're too small, they won't bring a good enough price when we go to auction them off. And I'm like, Well, there's you know what they look like, and if they're gonna anyways. And if they're gonna function. So yeah, it's freakish. So I guess that's it is. It's is that it's the the moth to the flame effect. But I'm surprised. So our question was worded
84
00:10:32.910 --> 00:10:40.730
Samantha Brooks: of these genetic conditions, which one is which oh, which it's like, which one is most concerning.
85
00:10:41.090 --> 00:10:41.450
Kris Hiney: And.
86
00:10:41.450 --> 00:10:49.119
Samantha Brooks: And I thought concerning would mean things that they felt were dangerous in some way. But I guess that's not. Guess they don't feel it's dangerous, because
87
00:10:50.802 --> 00:10:54.259
Samantha Brooks: anyways, science is easy. People are hard. Yeah.
88
00:10:54.260 --> 00:10:57.352
Kris Hiney: Yeah. The ethics of what one does with the science is,
89
00:10:57.610 --> 00:11:11.484
Samantha Brooks: Right? Yeah, yeah, this is the thing. We made a nice test. But okay, so so, stock horse wise, we can certainly talk about hypp if you want, but pssm, one is the one that I chose.
90
00:11:12.570 --> 00:11:21.210
Samantha Brooks: for a couple of reasons, and then for sport, horses, race horses truthfully, but also sport horses to some degree.
91
00:11:21.802 --> 00:11:24.879
Samantha Brooks: There's a genetic region for height
92
00:11:24.930 --> 00:11:30.509
Samantha Brooks: that is also important for development of OCD. And development of roaring, both of which are
93
00:11:30.620 --> 00:11:39.119
Samantha Brooks: pretty expensive and career ending even for a trail horse bad. Ocd. Is going to turn into hock arthritis, which is going to turn into injections or else walk
94
00:11:39.180 --> 00:11:40.699
Samantha Brooks: trot only, and
95
00:11:41.070 --> 00:11:45.820
Samantha Brooks: those kind of things. And then for sport, horse type
96
00:11:46.850 --> 00:11:59.210
Samantha Brooks: people I was talking about fragile, foal syndrome, which is now a big advantage. Well, there's several papers showing. It's it's advantageous for dressage. And so it's going to be the same situation as HYPP.
97
00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:01.670
Samantha Brooks: where 2 copies you're pretty much dead.
98
00:12:01.740 --> 00:12:11.299
Samantha Brooks: One copy everybody wants to breed for, and the Allele frequency is gonna start to sky Skyrocket right? And
99
00:12:12.630 --> 00:12:17.239
Samantha Brooks: the Pssm. And that height locus
100
00:12:17.860 --> 00:12:25.830
Samantha Brooks: are both kind of nice, because they have dietary management strategies to help to mitigate the negatives. And so, even if you have a
101
00:12:25.920 --> 00:12:27.999
Samantha Brooks: a fairly mature horse.
102
00:12:28.650 --> 00:12:37.000
Samantha Brooks: You know they carry. PSSM, you can make some fairly simple management changes to try to avoid
103
00:12:37.310 --> 00:12:45.879
Samantha Brooks: ending up with an episode of of PSSM. Which can be painful and expensive, and in some cases life-threatening. So
104
00:12:46.290 --> 00:12:49.139
Samantha Brooks: that was my tack previously was that
105
00:12:50.390 --> 00:12:52.859
Samantha Brooks: even if you have an adult horse and you're not a breeder.
106
00:12:53.450 --> 00:12:58.749
Samantha Brooks: You can learn some things about your horse to change the things that you to change the way you handle it day to day.
107
00:12:59.090 --> 00:13:00.260
Samantha Brooks: That will
108
00:13:00.810 --> 00:13:04.955
Samantha Brooks: improve your horse's performance and wellbeing, and hopefully also your
109
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:06.579
Samantha Brooks: wallet.
110
00:13:08.110 --> 00:13:10.360
Samantha Brooks: your economic sustainability.
111
00:13:10.360 --> 00:13:11.530
Kris Hiney: Gotcha gotcha.
112
00:13:11.530 --> 00:13:23.130
Samantha Brooks: So to speak. But there's a lot of topics we could go to on this. But yeah, why should the everyday? And then, of course there are ancestry products for the horse that are just as good, if not better, than what's in the dog. It's just.
113
00:13:23.560 --> 00:13:25.780
Samantha Brooks: I don't think people know, to look for it.
114
00:13:27.560 --> 00:13:30.180
Kris Hiney: and is it helpful? Right? Is it.
115
00:13:31.170 --> 00:13:34.299
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And is it helpful?
116
00:13:34.880 --> 00:13:41.689
Kris Hiney: Cause, I think, yeah, I mean, the difference is, so many people have mixed free dogs, which I don't think there's a plethora of people getting mixed horses just.
117
00:13:41.690 --> 00:13:48.118
Samantha Brooks: Well, what is a breed, though? Here's the whole. Now we get into philosophy. What is a breed? Because
118
00:13:48.440 --> 00:13:50.331
Kris Hiney: Association tells you it is.
119
00:13:51.070 --> 00:13:58.039
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, it's a piece of paper. Yeah, breed is as heritable as the paper. That darn pedigree is printed on.
120
00:13:58.992 --> 00:14:03.359
Samantha Brooks: It really is so so you can have something that's registered. You don't really know what it is.
121
00:14:03.500 --> 00:14:28.799
Samantha Brooks: I have a great example for that. My daughter's horse came to us with no papers. After going through 5 owners at some point we heard a rumor. She went through an auction in Texas. She went through several sets of hands, and we got her, and she's a cute little bay thing with a star, and looks vaguely stock horse to me. But she has these lovely, beautiful kind of hazel colored eyes. And so, me being a geneticist, I'm like, Oh, this is curious.
122
00:14:29.130 --> 00:14:41.789
Samantha Brooks: So I knew. I know there's a locus for he, for light colored eyes. They call it a tiger eye, and I thought, Well, we should test for that. So while I was doing that, I said, well, we're just going to do. We know nothing about her. So we did a full ancestry panel. We probably should just.
123
00:14:41.860 --> 00:14:50.569
Samantha Brooks: I don't know. You can edit this right. We did a full ancestry panel on her. And I did comprehensive genetic testing, because I didn't know enough about her
124
00:14:50.750 --> 00:14:52.720
Samantha Brooks: breed, so to speak.
125
00:14:52.800 --> 00:14:54.359
Samantha Brooks: to decide
126
00:14:54.730 --> 00:14:55.710
Samantha Brooks: what
127
00:14:56.810 --> 00:14:59.470
Samantha Brooks: targeted panel would be appropriate. And
128
00:14:59.640 --> 00:15:04.779
Samantha Brooks: these days genetic testing is cheaper if you buy in bulk. So I was like, just do the whole thing.
129
00:15:05.810 --> 00:15:08.980
Samantha Brooks: Well, it turns out she is
130
00:15:09.260 --> 00:15:17.050
Samantha Brooks: probably a stock horse based on her ancestry. She genetically, is half thoroughbred, full 50%. So
131
00:15:17.290 --> 00:15:21.190
Samantha Brooks: typical for a like a performance type, quarter horse
132
00:15:21.310 --> 00:15:24.709
Samantha Brooks: for a pleasure type, quarter horse or stock horse
133
00:15:24.830 --> 00:15:39.300
Samantha Brooks: type group, including the paint horses. And when we looked at her genetic testing for known for known traits. She didn't have anything for light colored eyes. What she did have was a frame overo Allele.
134
00:15:39.770 --> 00:15:40.620
Kris Hiney: And.
135
00:15:40.970 --> 00:15:42.900
Samantha Brooks: She's Bay with
136
00:15:42.990 --> 00:15:45.490
Samantha Brooks: a small star and a small sock.
137
00:15:46.440 --> 00:15:50.850
Samantha Brooks: No, no bright colored markings really whatsoever.
138
00:15:51.560 --> 00:16:01.039
Samantha Brooks: for us. That's valuable information to know my my daughter begs me to breathe the mayor every year. I don't know that I will, because I'm not made of money, but
139
00:16:01.568 --> 00:16:08.750
Samantha Brooks: she is such a spectacular 4 h horse, just a trooper, and knock on wood sound as dollar.
140
00:16:08.820 --> 00:16:30.829
Samantha Brooks: So you know a as a genetic system like she's got some merit but if we were to have chosen, say, a nice paint horse stallion, and weren't careful, we could have ended up with in a in a very lethal white syndrome full, who would die shortly after birth, and it would have no clue to that. That was a possibility, because she does not carry the overt phenotype
141
00:16:30.940 --> 00:16:34.139
Samantha Brooks: of of an of of a paint horse. So
142
00:16:34.330 --> 00:16:40.979
Samantha Brooks: my! Based on those clues. I suspect she was bred in a paint horse program, and.
143
00:16:40.980 --> 00:16:41.450
Kris Hiney: And be.
144
00:16:41.450 --> 00:16:41.880
Samantha Brooks: Because.
145
00:16:41.880 --> 00:16:42.350
Kris Hiney: She did.
146
00:16:42.600 --> 00:16:50.660
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, she did not have qualifying white enough now. They'll accept genetic testing, but she's in her 15 or so years old
147
00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:59.639
Samantha Brooks: back. Then she couldn't have gotten registered, based solely on a genetic test. So she probably got discarded as a solid paint.
148
00:17:00.310 --> 00:17:07.690
Samantha Brooks: and that fills us in a little bit about, you know. Just so. We know a little bit more about this horse that we spend so much time with, and
149
00:17:08.510 --> 00:17:13.069
Samantha Brooks: fortunately she does not have an HYPP. Or a Pssm. Or
150
00:17:13.329 --> 00:17:28.723
Samantha Brooks: something health-wise, that that could be potentially alarming. But that that frame of arrow is is definitely a. It's a curiosity, and and if I win the lottery tomorrow and decide to go into horse breeding and decide to breed her, I definitely know a little bit better about how I should.
151
00:17:29.450 --> 00:17:30.800
Samantha Brooks: I should target that.
152
00:17:30.800 --> 00:17:38.270
Kris Hiney: So as the geneticist. Why, what controls, whether that overo gene is expressed or not expressed.
153
00:17:38.703 --> 00:17:40.870
Samantha Brooks: Well, ask mother nature, cause.
154
00:17:40.870 --> 00:17:41.350
Kris Hiney: It is not.
155
00:17:41.350 --> 00:17:41.940
Samantha Brooks: Telling.
156
00:17:41.940 --> 00:17:45.449
Kris Hiney: No, I'm asking Dr. Samantha Brooks, equine, genetic expert.
157
00:17:45.800 --> 00:17:48.110
Samantha Brooks: Oh, the expert, the expert!
158
00:17:48.710 --> 00:18:13.859
Samantha Brooks: Alright! Well, you know. So during development, your Milano cytes migrate in that tiny little embroyo they migrate from a population of stem cells that evolves along what we call the neural crest which lies where the spinal column eventually will form, and in some ways. It makes sense, right? Cause. Neurons are these cells that have lots of branches
159
00:18:13.860 --> 00:18:27.849
Samantha Brooks: and melanocytes or cells that have lots of branches. They're little factories that make pigment, and then they ship that pigment out along the branches, out to the the follicles that are gonna make hair and the skin cells that that need pigment.
160
00:18:28.320 --> 00:18:39.935
Samantha Brooks: So they start just along the top line of the embryo, and then they respond to migratory signals. These chemical roadmaps that are
161
00:18:40.500 --> 00:18:59.840
Samantha Brooks: secreted by the so the destination cells and the melanocytes. Actually, I've got a great video of melanocytes labeled with fluorescent dye on a little mouse embryo. But they literally flow out and around the body of the embryo to get to their final location.
162
00:19:00.162 --> 00:19:25.970
Samantha Brooks: So many things can disrupt those chemical signals in lots of horses, for both genetic and random reasons. They don't make it all the way to the ends of those limbs, and we end up with socks right? And in an embryo the nose is actually pretty far to get to, too. So you end up with a blaze. Those markings are common in those locations, because in the developing embryo they're actually quite far from from where the melanocytes
163
00:19:26.270 --> 00:19:27.690
Samantha Brooks: start their journey.
164
00:19:28.070 --> 00:19:40.300
Samantha Brooks: So if you, if you disrupt those chemical signals in a number of different ways. You end up with these different sort of flow patterns where the migration has been disrupted at certain periods of time.
165
00:19:40.822 --> 00:20:07.740
Samantha Brooks: Things like Tobiano get these sort of big puddles in one place or another, and frame of arrow is kind of odd, because it seems like they kind of start, and then they kind of get distracted and and don't seem to finish out and and don't both flow, and then fill in across the the skin surface. So to keep with that analogy, if you think about like, if you were to take a bucket of paint and throw it out across the concrete floor.
166
00:20:08.390 --> 00:20:19.519
Samantha Brooks: Even if you had 10 opportunities to do this. This sounds like a very therapeutic, asmr kind of activity, right? But if you had 10 opportunities to throw that bucket of paint
167
00:20:19.640 --> 00:20:31.220
Samantha Brooks: every time you do it. It's it's not going to be the same right? So so each time you have a foal, and these pigment cells begin to migrate. It's going to be a slightly unique pattern in that animal.
168
00:20:31.760 --> 00:20:43.830
Samantha Brooks: So as it turns out in frame overo. If we set a human defined threshold, like like the traditional limits for white markings in the American Paint Horse.
169
00:20:44.230 --> 00:21:07.759
Samantha Brooks: that just by random chance, about 9 out of 10 horses that carry one frame of arrow. Allele will make it beyond that threshold, and we'll have some fairly dramatic and exciting markings on them. But one out of every 10 times. So 10% of frame of overo horses do not have markings that reach that threshold, and many of them have
170
00:21:08.060 --> 00:21:25.669
Samantha Brooks: very plain markings like our little mare. And it it's just, you know, it's just part of that, that mystery that is a Mother nature and that random game of chance that sometimes they make it, sometimes they don't. Now
171
00:21:26.020 --> 00:21:32.830
Samantha Brooks: other patterns like Tobiano. You can think about it. Tobiano just has a bigger market of paint to start with, right? So
172
00:21:33.100 --> 00:21:43.880
Samantha Brooks: something around 99% of Tobiano horses will make it beyond that threshold. But there are a very small proportion of even Tobiano horses who carry one allele
173
00:21:44.120 --> 00:22:06.220
Samantha Brooks: that don't have markings that would be overtly recognizable as characteristic of of Tobiano. We call those Crypto Tobiano, sometimes because they are sort of surprising when they happen. But it's all part of that normal bell curve distribution. Right? So among those overos, 10% will be really spectacular
174
00:22:06.500 --> 00:22:16.639
Samantha Brooks: white markings that are very dramatic, and 10% will be fairly plainly marked, and most of them fall in sort of that average bin
175
00:22:16.970 --> 00:22:18.230
Samantha Brooks: of markings.
176
00:22:18.230 --> 00:22:35.999
Kris Hiney: So would we am I correct? Is that epigenetics, or is it not? So like, maybe we'll try to explain. There's your genetics that like that that doesn't change right? And then there's like all these other things that happen that affect how your genes are expressed. So is that
177
00:22:36.600 --> 00:22:37.280
Kris Hiney: part of that.
178
00:22:37.280 --> 00:22:37.780
Samantha Brooks: Right.
179
00:22:37.780 --> 00:22:39.469
Kris Hiney: And I misrepresent.
180
00:22:39.470 --> 00:22:43.319
Samantha Brooks: No, no, it it can be part of. It's just random chance.
181
00:22:43.600 --> 00:22:56.970
Samantha Brooks: Part of it is that basket. Of all the other things that can can alter genetics. So those can include influences from other genes. So gene by gene interactions, influences from the environment
182
00:22:57.628 --> 00:23:18.459
Samantha Brooks: and then epigenetics itself are regulatory changes that are carried on the DNA that are added in response to certain environmental triggers, but particularly during very critical periods, right around fertilization and an early embryonic development. So that's epigenetics, or these
183
00:23:18.490 --> 00:23:24.729
Samantha Brooks: changes in the way the DNA is packaged to try to prepare that embryo for a life that might be somewhat challenging.
184
00:23:25.200 --> 00:23:36.589
Samantha Brooks: So there are gene by gene interactions for things even as simple as coat color and white spotting the easiest one to talk about is chestnut versus, not chestnut.
185
00:23:36.890 --> 00:23:41.430
Samantha Brooks: So if you look at patterns like Tobiano and fame overo
186
00:23:41.720 --> 00:23:48.910
Samantha Brooks: both of them, the horses will statistically, significantly, have more white markings. If they are on a
187
00:23:48.970 --> 00:24:05.470
Samantha Brooks: a chestnut base coat color than if they're on a bay or black base coat color. And the biological reasoning for that is that chestnut itself results from a genetic alteration that disrupts the function of a switch called MC one r.
188
00:24:05.620 --> 00:24:17.639
Samantha Brooks: and that switch turns on the ability to make black pigment, and when it's defective it's stuck in the off position. So our chestnut horses have a slightly defective black pigment on switch.
189
00:24:17.740 --> 00:24:37.062
Samantha Brooks: That switch is also important for cell signaling. And so in mice and rats and humans in horses. If you take those pigment cells that have a defective switch and put them into culture. They're kind of lazy pigment cells. The the chestnut pigment cells are just not as prolific for
190
00:24:38.661 --> 00:25:01.529
Samantha Brooks: increasing their population and growing in a dish, and all those those kind of activities. So it makes sense that that after they make their migration, those chestnut pigment cells are a little bit lazy, so they don't. They don't multiply as fast. They don't cover the horses completely. And so chestnut plus mini white spotting patterns equals more white spottings than your average horse.
191
00:25:01.960 --> 00:25:10.869
Samantha Brooks: Okay? And then there, there could be environmental things shown gene by environment. It's not well documented in verses, but it is well documented in mice
192
00:25:10.960 --> 00:25:19.330
Samantha Brooks: that another nutritional impact is methionine, which is important in the pathway for making pigment.
193
00:25:19.510 --> 00:25:31.899
Samantha Brooks: So in mice, if you supplement methionine and certain genetic backgrounds to the the mama mouse. The baby mice that are growing in utero will experience
194
00:25:31.900 --> 00:25:56.590
Samantha Brooks: changes in their coat color that will last throughout the rest of the life of the little baby mouse. They're they're really cute, because if if they on one side of the dietary spectrum, they get these puffy little orange chestnut mice we caught we call little pumpkin mice, cause they were so cute, and and then, with the right amount of supplementation, you get dark coated, kind of like, almost like bay colored mice that are very thin and lean so
195
00:25:56.650 --> 00:26:10.619
Samantha Brooks: that nutritional impact, probably through epigenetics and the environmental impact acting through epigenetics, changes the programming for genes that are important both for pigmentation and for metabolism.
196
00:26:11.469 --> 00:26:21.589
Samantha Brooks: There's many, many different mechanisms that will alter gene regulation, most of which we've never had the opportunity to properly study in the in the horse.
197
00:26:23.350 --> 00:26:27.019
Samantha Brooks: so there! It's complicated. The the expert says it's complicated.
198
00:26:27.364 --> 00:26:50.119
Kris Hiney: That's fine, like, I think that that actually is, is super important for people that are breeding their horses because they need to know that right? So that example of that solid Bay Mare like you need to know, or why. Sometimes you get this surprise like what the heck? Where did these colors come from right. They were hiding on that bell curve. I guess.
199
00:26:50.120 --> 00:27:15.238
Samantha Brooks: Right? Yeah, absolutely. They can hide on the bell curve for sure. And then you can have gene by gene interactions that will hide some of these phenotypes that can come out. You know I get people who aren't that excited about genetics will tell me. Well, I don't want to do it, because I think horse breeding is an art, and I feel like if I you know, if I do, the genetics is gonna take all the fun out of it. And and first of all, I congratulate them on being independently wealthy, because
200
00:27:15.865 --> 00:27:42.490
Samantha Brooks: many of us breed horses as a business, and so we need to be a little bit. If we're going to survive as a business, we have no choice but to be more strategic about it. But then, second of all I say, you know, even with the best planning, even if you very carefully pick those genotypes and sire and dam, it's still a flip of the coin as to which alleles that baby gets so there will always be surprises, despite all of our best laid plans. So
201
00:27:42.920 --> 00:27:50.229
Samantha Brooks: genetics will never take the fun or challenge completely out of horse breeding. It just lets us be a little more strategic about it.
202
00:27:50.230 --> 00:27:57.180
Kris Hiney: Right. And I think you know what in the horse industry, maybe what's frustrating for people. One is, we're probably not looking for that.
203
00:27:57.180 --> 00:28:20.999
Kris Hiney: The traits that are as heritable as in other like milk production. And, rate of gain, we just don't have these measurable concrete things right? That like, if you're a winner or a loser. There's a lot that goes into it versus a measurement that a whole bunch of researchers can take on a population over time. Isn't that. What kind of murk murkeys us up a bit.
204
00:28:21.950 --> 00:28:28.729
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, you know, that is a that is a huge challenge for us right now. And it's not that I think it's
205
00:28:28.950 --> 00:28:36.309
Samantha Brooks: it's not doable as much as we simply don't have the the tools or the industry-wide agreement. I mean.
206
00:28:37.350 --> 00:28:47.079
Samantha Brooks: most dairy men will agree. A cow needs to make milk, you know. Then you can have discussions about somatic cell count, or about milk. Fat? Yes, but most of them agree. They need to make milk
207
00:28:47.110 --> 00:29:10.059
Samantha Brooks: when it comes to horses. It's hard to get 3 horse people in a room and get them all to agree about what's the most valuable thing in horses. But typically those are hard things to measure things like performance. They are, they are difficult, they are multifactorial. They have huge influences due to environment, but we know it is in part genetic.
208
00:29:10.448 --> 00:29:33.399
Samantha Brooks: A draft horse is not going to necessarily win the triple crown, but by the same token, Thoroughbred horse is not gonna survive long pulling a plow. So we know that we as as humans have shaped the genetics of these breeds to alter performance, we can do it. So there are genes.
209
00:29:33.680 --> 00:29:40.641
Samantha Brooks: There definitely are genes involved. Right? So part of what I've done in my research program lately is is is
210
00:29:41.540 --> 00:29:50.580
Samantha Brooks: as we've had to sort of work a little bit more strategically because of the severe lack of research funding right now.
211
00:29:50.900 --> 00:29:57.870
Samantha Brooks: I've decided you know what I'm I'm not. I'm not so fascinated with working on genetic diseases, because there's always another one of those.
212
00:29:58.560 --> 00:30:12.390
Samantha Brooks: There's always another one of those to study. So at the moment we are focused on developing new ways to measure the 2 traits that I decided were most important to horse owners. And I got to decide, because, you know.
213
00:30:12.390 --> 00:30:15.006
Kris Hiney: Yours right? I choose.
214
00:30:15.530 --> 00:30:24.900
Samantha Brooks: That's right. I choose. But I think I chose pretty good because I decided, broadly speaking, we're focusing. The 2 traits are sane and sound.
215
00:30:24.960 --> 00:30:47.350
Samantha Brooks: And it's just that it's just that simple, right? So we developed a behavioral assay to look at startle response. So that initial subconscious reaction that can trigger fear related behaviors and horses, and anyone who's a horse person has been subject to the fear plus gravity effect which ends up with
216
00:30:47.400 --> 00:30:58.779
Samantha Brooks: rider on the ground so, or rider getting knocked down, or a driven horse taking off at the cart, leaving Driver behind.
217
00:30:59.070 --> 00:31:12.339
Samantha Brooks: So most people agree that that that's a pretty important trait to focus on. So what is a sound, or what is a sane mind? And how does it work? And and we focus on the reflexive part, because that's the easiest corner to work
218
00:31:12.760 --> 00:31:22.019
Samantha Brooks: and then soundness. So we were starting to use some AI tools to try to track locomotion, because when we were asking about locomotor traits as they related to performance.
219
00:31:22.600 --> 00:31:29.550
Samantha Brooks: There were just simply no tools available to us, even even in in clinical equine, medicine.
220
00:31:29.750 --> 00:31:31.260
Samantha Brooks: and orthopedics.
221
00:31:31.540 --> 00:31:34.659
Samantha Brooks: The best tool we have right now for detecting
222
00:31:34.720 --> 00:31:37.080
Samantha Brooks: changes in limb function is still
223
00:31:37.110 --> 00:31:46.600
Samantha Brooks: the human eye, which is not very sensitive, not very repeatable, and subject to all sorts of of bias. So
224
00:31:47.880 --> 00:31:48.530
Samantha Brooks: yeah.
225
00:31:48.530 --> 00:31:59.166
Kris Hiney: I think there's a new tool coming, though that's better than maybe the lameness locator that is hopefully in the works. You're tied with that.
226
00:31:59.560 --> 00:32:04.149
Samantha Brooks: No? Well, there's a commercial. Yeah. There's a commercial activity in Europe.
227
00:32:04.700 --> 00:32:16.459
Samantha Brooks: That has started to work on a cell phone app, which I I think, as terms of an idea is a great idea. They I'm not sure their approach is necessarily the right one. We're going a different angle on that.
228
00:32:16.850 --> 00:32:24.020
Samantha Brooks: We are using all free type software applications so freely available software applications
229
00:32:24.080 --> 00:32:32.300
Samantha Brooks: and reinventing the wheel, so to speak. So rather than relying on the characteristics that the human eye
230
00:32:32.360 --> 00:32:48.820
Samantha Brooks: typically uses. We are going straight for the quantitative measures, things like joint range of motion. And how much time that foot spends on the ground. It's it's a harder road, to hoe to just discard the adaptive
231
00:32:49.410 --> 00:33:14.250
Samantha Brooks: characteristics that we have used as humans. But the the point of using something like a camera or a cell phone is that it is recordable. So 100 reevaluatable can be repeatable in the right set of hands, and it works at 120 frames per second. Human eye cannot see that fast. So we're we're gonna try to reinvent the wheel on that, and see see where it goes.
232
00:33:14.250 --> 00:33:18.335
Kris Hiney: So I have a question on the on the the behavior side. So
233
00:33:18.710 --> 00:33:31.410
Kris Hiney: anybody that listens to the podcast knows that I'm also a dog nut. So there have been. I'm sure you're familiar with all the dog genetic stuff, too, because it gets around. So the big controversy one is like this
234
00:33:31.700 --> 00:33:56.839
Kris Hiney: is behavior genetic. And so like the breed predictability. Because I I I hear it all the time right? So that the breed does not predict behavior at all, every individual is an individual. And I'm gonna I'm gonna let you kind of. I'm gonna give my little 2 cents and then ask you how you think about it. But to me
235
00:33:57.130 --> 00:34:06.690
Kris Hiney: it is predictive. Right? So the breed what you've genetically selected for is predictive of a lot of things. So
236
00:34:07.010 --> 00:34:15.650
Kris Hiney: where we at with horses is that a factor, or are we still? Every individual is an individual.
237
00:34:16.130 --> 00:34:26.110
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, well, I'll tell you. This debate is not unique to horses and dogs. I was just reviewing some literature and human psychology yesterday for some grant writing that I'm doing.
238
00:34:26.219 --> 00:34:35.619
Samantha Brooks: And you know, they are just coming around to this this concept that there is more
239
00:34:36.000 --> 00:34:47.289
Samantha Brooks: to the relationship between genetics and what we call temperament. So so, your temperament being sort of your baseline level of sensitivity and reactivity
240
00:34:47.440 --> 00:35:02.140
Samantha Brooks: than we ever previously appreciated, because in many of these studies they would often ignore things like environmental and developmental factors. Right? But if you conduct a thorough enough study to look at things like the environment.
241
00:35:02.190 --> 00:35:19.150
Samantha Brooks: All of a sudden you start to realize, hey, wait a minute. Genetics was actually underpinning a lot of this in in human psychology, where it becomes very interesting is we looked at 2 studies, one looking at at cardiovascular disease, now 3, actually one at cardiovascular disease, one at Alzheimer's disease, and one at Osteoarthritis
242
00:35:20.230 --> 00:35:27.300
Samantha Brooks: and for the 2 disease States. Having a underlying temperament that was more
243
00:35:27.630 --> 00:35:53.680
Samantha Brooks: sensitive and prone to anxiety, was also a very significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer's disease, and when it came to osteoarthritis, the level of of limb function, and of that patient's perceived pain was quite a bit higher in underlying temperament styles that were more sensitive and prone to prone to anxiety.
244
00:35:54.010 --> 00:36:03.100
Samantha Brooks: So so when it comes to horses and dogs, we know there are a couple, a couple of of well known underlying genetic alleles that do
245
00:36:03.230 --> 00:36:09.569
Samantha Brooks: influence specific tendencies, but across breeds the theme tends to be that
246
00:36:09.800 --> 00:36:12.579
Samantha Brooks: genetics can set up
247
00:36:12.720 --> 00:36:15.400
Samantha Brooks: a a heritable temperament.
248
00:36:15.440 --> 00:36:17.579
Samantha Brooks: an underlying sort of
249
00:36:17.920 --> 00:36:20.540
Samantha Brooks: foundation that
250
00:36:20.680 --> 00:36:23.159
Samantha Brooks: will sort of dictate
251
00:36:23.700 --> 00:36:30.530
Samantha Brooks: under controlled circumstances what your reflexive actions are likely to be.
252
00:36:30.600 --> 00:36:34.700
Samantha Brooks: and then you can layer on top of that.
253
00:36:35.246 --> 00:36:57.720
Samantha Brooks: Early life, developmental and learning experiences so particularly like our in year experiences even and then. And then there's a lot that can be can be learned during infancy. And then on top of that, the influence of environment. So are you in a very stressful situation versus are you in a very supportive
254
00:36:58.180 --> 00:37:00.270
Samantha Brooks: type of environment.
255
00:37:00.340 --> 00:37:19.750
Samantha Brooks: and that they got those sort of 3 layers of the cake as what's really shaping what we perceive as animal owners and as fellow humans as that day to day behavior. And I think because of the 2 layers on top of it, genetics gets a little bit overlooked these days, and we thought, Oh, it's all has to do with.
256
00:37:19.770 --> 00:37:28.939
Samantha Brooks: You know what you've learned and and the situation you're in, and that's not necessarily true. Your your default programming is largely genetic, and it gets altered based on those 2 terms.
257
00:37:28.940 --> 00:37:37.407
Kris Hiney: So it'd be like the genetics is actually the cake. And then all those decorations they put on top and put the fondant on.
258
00:37:37.760 --> 00:38:04.865
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, right? Right? Yeah. So you walk up and you take a slice of white cake, you think, oh, this will be great. It'll be vanilla, and then you cut it open. You're like, Oh, never mind, is chocolate, you know. Yeah, that's that could be a good. It could be a good analogy. So specifically, in some preliminary data we presented at a meeting a couple of years ago, my Phd student, who is still we conduct this behavioral experiment every single year with our Uf. Full crop. So we've done it for 10 years. I'll probably have to do it for another 10 years before we get
259
00:38:05.110 --> 00:38:22.399
Samantha Brooks: full a full sample size we can analyze. But when she looked at the heritability, so the proportion of a given trait due to genetics just for that initial spook response. So we take our baby horses and we take an automatic umbrella and we pop it open at them.
260
00:38:22.460 --> 00:38:28.579
Samantha Brooks: and fun ensues. Right? But when we look at the first 3 s, so
261
00:38:28.900 --> 00:38:33.080
Samantha Brooks: did they did they react strongly to the umbrella or not
262
00:38:33.120 --> 00:38:35.969
Samantha Brooks: in her numbers. 2 thirds of that was genetics.
263
00:38:37.110 --> 00:38:38.250
Samantha Brooks: Pretty pretty high.
264
00:38:38.590 --> 00:38:48.319
Samantha Brooks: The interesting thing is is that when we look at the later behaviors like, did they spin and run? Did they stand nearby, chew a couple times and go back to eating.
265
00:38:48.652 --> 00:39:09.930
Samantha Brooks: Those later behaviors. The heritability drops off very, very quickly. So so it sets up this really elegant solution for me, for the average horse owner. And that, let's say you're going to buy a new horse, or you're you know you're looking for a horse for your daughter, or you're trying to decide what to do with a problematic horse. Should you send them to the trainer?
266
00:39:10.210 --> 00:39:22.550
Samantha Brooks: If we can identify those reactivity genes early on. So is, are they going to react? Are they not? Gonna well, if they're not gonna react, you probably don't want to turn them into a racehorse or barrel racer, or a cutting horse, because
267
00:39:22.720 --> 00:39:50.449
Samantha Brooks: they may not have the quick reflexes you want, but they could be a great 4 H horse right? And then in among those who are reactive type, then we know that environment and learned experience are going to be key. So I might a target that horse potentially for the professional who wants super quick reflexes. And B, I'm going to be especially cautious on how I train that animal, and because I know that those later gross motor behaviors had fairly low heritability.
268
00:39:50.820 --> 00:39:56.829
Samantha Brooks: I also know that I have a really great chance to be able to to
269
00:39:56.950 --> 00:40:00.190
Samantha Brooks: influence that horse's behavior through
270
00:40:00.220 --> 00:40:02.750
Samantha Brooks: targeted strategic training approaches.
271
00:40:02.750 --> 00:40:18.239
Kris Hiney: So, and and I don't wanna maybe extrapolate too much. But this is this is fun for me, cause I do really love the behavior side. So a. And I've always said, you know, there's certain training practices that in some horses like, essentially.
272
00:40:18.250 --> 00:40:24.119
Kris Hiney: you know, when they're desensitizing them, and and the ones you do it the wrong way. Right? So to me, those ones that have
273
00:40:24.140 --> 00:40:27.109
Kris Hiney: the look that higher, startle response
274
00:40:27.210 --> 00:40:31.790
Kris Hiney: tend to be the ones that retain fear memories
275
00:40:32.090 --> 00:40:51.270
Kris Hiney: more so, and are not good candidates for some, and that's where sometimes they sort a little bit along some genetic lines that I've been a believer of no, it. This is not a one fit. One. Size fits all because there's something unique about those horses, about how they
276
00:40:51.580 --> 00:40:59.969
Kris Hiney: then retain learning. Am I making too much out of this from that little bit? If there's a genetic piece to that startle response.
277
00:41:00.130 --> 00:41:13.530
Samantha Brooks: Alright. Well, I I am not a neuroscientist. But I do collaborate with them a lot, because I I really want to find a way to study these traits more closely. But yes, memories are are laid down
278
00:41:13.980 --> 00:41:26.369
Samantha Brooks: very effectively when they are associated with a strong emotional response and emotional responses typically coming from the amygdala in the brain. Right? So if you've got this horse, who has that reactive temperament type
279
00:41:26.470 --> 00:41:49.400
Samantha Brooks: and they get set off by, you know the wind blow. I'll tell you, I went on. A trail ride the other day, and my neighbor had put a bunch of feed sacks in the trash can to be picked up, and one of them had gotten loose, and my rock solid eventer, who never spooks anything. One of those feedbags caught the wind, and flipped up like right in front of us, like one of those clowns in the funhouse
280
00:41:49.430 --> 00:41:50.719
Samantha Brooks: at the fair.
281
00:41:50.750 --> 00:42:04.350
Samantha Brooks: And bless his heart, you know, he, we both had a I don't think it scared me more, and it scared him. But you have an unexpected reaction right? And if that in some horses is accompanied by that negative emotional
282
00:42:05.161 --> 00:42:16.579
Samantha Brooks: outpouring, so to speak. It's gonna be more likely to be held in memory because because of the tie to emotion into the activation and the amyg and the amygdala.
283
00:42:17.380 --> 00:42:30.299
Samantha Brooks: That means, yeah. You do have to be more careful with them, right? Because if they're going to be more likely to be triggered into an emotional response. You know you're going to be laying down some longer term
284
00:42:30.640 --> 00:42:53.959
Samantha Brooks: sort of effects than maybe with another horse and on the flip side. If they associate you personally with positive experiences and a positive emotional state, then they might form a more indelible bond with you as a handler, and might retain some of those skills that they learn while you're they're in a positive training environment
285
00:42:54.440 --> 00:42:59.989
Samantha Brooks: much longer than a horse who found the whole thing to be very blase. Right?
286
00:43:00.240 --> 00:43:03.010
Samantha Brooks: It's with great power comes great responsibility.
287
00:43:03.010 --> 00:43:21.899
Kris Hiney: Yeah, no, that's I just think this is super cool, because you're saying the science supports. What a a lot of hopefully good horsemen have been like, know those sensitive ones. You need to treat differently. But like there's legit reasons why that we need to do that and appreciate
288
00:43:21.900 --> 00:43:34.032
Kris Hiney: literally the genetic background of that animal. And when you just said, like those more amygdala driven like I own them. An emo, an amygdala amygdala! There we go. I know what the word.
289
00:43:34.370 --> 00:43:36.319
Samantha Brooks: That brain part back there. Yeah.
290
00:43:36.320 --> 00:43:49.330
Kris Hiney: Yeah, that little nut back there. I have an amygdala driven dog right? And so they are very different. Doesn't mean they're not trainable. But, man, you just gotta do things a little bit more
291
00:43:49.410 --> 00:43:50.720
Kris Hiney: carefully.
292
00:43:52.030 --> 00:44:21.579
Samantha Brooks: Right? Right? You do. You do. And you do for the behavioral reasons. And I think, as we have recently shown in humans, and I think, will show in horses. You need to do it for health reasons as well. Right like you know the behavior part, so can you. Can your horse do his job day to day, and then can you afford to keep him without having to have the ved out every other day and write a whole bunch of checks. Yeah, so it makes sense to really to pay attention to these things. They they're tough questions, like, when I'm writing a Grant
293
00:44:22.090 --> 00:44:28.639
Samantha Brooks: Grant agencies are tend to be more interested in something they could say, put in a syringe and use tomorrow.
294
00:44:28.660 --> 00:44:29.700
Kris Hiney: Hmm sure.
295
00:44:29.700 --> 00:44:37.080
Samantha Brooks: Shortsighted the industry as a whole. They're like, yes. What am I gonna do about my my horse? You know my fools that have rotococcus this season?
296
00:44:37.080 --> 00:44:37.529
Kris Hiney: Yeah.
297
00:44:37.980 --> 00:44:45.070
Samantha Brooks: And I'm like, I know. Oh, I know I get it. I totally get it. But I think that some of these bigger questions
298
00:44:45.180 --> 00:44:51.520
Samantha Brooks: have the potential for for greater payoff. It's just going to be more of a long term investment.
299
00:44:51.520 --> 00:45:03.879
Kris Hiney: Yeah, I'm just like that. It's more broadly applicable to so many different species. And and humans like, if you even know, like, your genetic background is, you're already a little on the twitchy side, like here's the things we can do.
300
00:45:03.880 --> 00:45:25.440
Samantha Brooks: Right? Right? Yeah, I saw some great work looking at humans and and their temperament style as it interact, and their temperament style being largely genetic in nature, and then their stress environment based on their academic. I'm sorry. Academic, that's not right. Their economic
301
00:45:26.280 --> 00:45:39.610
Samantha Brooks: been so were they within poverty or above the the Federal poverty threshold, and and the the more vulnerable personalities really excelled when they were above
302
00:45:40.005 --> 00:46:07.280
Samantha Brooks: poverty threshold, but were disproportionately, negatively impacted when they were below poverty, so that that sensitivity it was. It was both a super power and a a source of kryptonite, so to speak, given a specific environment, and as animal managers, we sometimes, as much as possible have the power to alter that environment. And if if we have a roadmap to help us decide how to alter it.
303
00:46:07.670 --> 00:46:14.890
Samantha Brooks: We can really make some measurable changes in the day-to-day quality of life for our horses and ourselves.
304
00:46:14.890 --> 00:46:29.459
Kris Hiney: Well, it's even. And it's nice, because it sounds like this the genetic background, which is really, I think, helpful to explain, at least has some phenotypic expression like you're talking about that startle response that would help people sort.
305
00:46:29.630 --> 00:46:46.620
Kris Hiney: This horse needs to be in the hands of somebody who is much more attuned and sympathetic to that kind of reactivity, and can excel like you said so. The humans that excelled versus I could see that same horse in the wrong environment would be in real jeopardy. Right.
306
00:46:46.620 --> 00:47:08.919
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely. So that's that's part of what we're doing now is that in the interim before we have a nice genetic test to to give a prediction that would be. You know, you send off some hairs and you get back a percentage of always 70 likely to be a challenge in this situation. Right? In the meantime, if we improve our measures of phenotype, we can begin to select on phenotype specifically so.
307
00:47:09.440 --> 00:47:25.999
Samantha Brooks: Dr. Wickens had a lovely student, Ellen Rankins, who did a bit of work. Yeah, they they did. And now Ellen's up at Rutgers, right. So part of what she did when she was here at Florida was look at ways to measure behavioral reactivity in therapy horses.
308
00:47:26.860 --> 00:47:43.129
Samantha Brooks: So that, you know, when you got a new therapy horse in, you could do things like like measure their skin sensitivity to calibrated touch and measure their how they react to a uniform behavioral trial like show them a novel object
309
00:47:43.210 --> 00:48:11.969
Samantha Brooks: to see if there are ways that that we could start to measure this consistently animal to animal and over time, so that we can select on phenotypes with some sort of an organized system until we get better knowledge of of the genetics. And and that's where we're at with the locomotion project, too, is that while long term, I really want to make these tools, so I can do genetics in the short term. It gives us a better way to measure the phenotype, and then you can select on that phenotype.
310
00:48:12.010 --> 00:48:18.350
Samantha Brooks: both as breeders and as potential purchasers and as managers. Right? Because phenotype can change day to day.
311
00:48:18.850 --> 00:48:29.600
Samantha Brooks: you can look at your interaction between a genetically influenced phenotype and the environment. If you have a uniform way to measure it day to day to day, just like we have a weght tape
312
00:48:29.870 --> 00:48:40.169
Samantha Brooks: for for body, condition and and body weight estimates. It'd be nice to have something as simple and repeatable and inexpensive for some of these
313
00:48:40.950 --> 00:48:43.080
Samantha Brooks: more complex traits.
314
00:48:43.080 --> 00:49:03.279
Kris Hiney: Yeah, I just think that, like the future that I would envision is, you're like he has been tested to be 70% 4-H horse. But like, I just think there's such a population need for that kind of animal, because, like the performance ones, need to be twitchier. But we need this population of
315
00:49:03.760 --> 00:49:05.909
Kris Hiney: non reactors, so to speak, which.
316
00:49:05.910 --> 00:49:06.400
Samantha Brooks: Yeah.
317
00:49:06.805 --> 00:49:07.210
Kris Hiney: Wish.
318
00:49:07.440 --> 00:49:35.329
Samantha Brooks: Absolutely like people say, Oh, I never! You know. Why would we? Wanna why would we wanna breathe the reactivity out of our horses, thinking of like a genetic disease, and I'm like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no! The fun thing about horses and roll. One reason why we still have so much genetic diversity within horses that we've lost somewhat in some of our dog breeds is that they all do very, very different jobs. And it's not about building the perfect horse. It's about finding the right horse to the right job.
319
00:49:35.610 --> 00:50:03.970
Samantha Brooks: So for some animals, it's gonna be more reactivity. And for other animals. Yeah, it's it's gonna be, it's gonna be less reactivity. And and anytime you can get a little bit of extra guidance about what job is gonna be best suited to. It's gonna save a lot of time, right? Because I feel like these days, we don't have as many horse people. And I think that the research supports this. We don't have as many horse people who grew up around horses, and and it can take years, if not decades.
320
00:50:03.970 --> 00:50:11.100
Samantha Brooks: to calibrate your human brain and eyes to be able to assess intuitively
321
00:50:11.150 --> 00:50:18.539
Samantha Brooks: reactivity reactivity in a horse in a fairly short amount of time. We just don't have as many humans that have that kind of
322
00:50:19.290 --> 00:50:28.269
Samantha Brooks: carefully practiced skill anymore. So it's probably time we started to use some technologies to help all the rest of us
323
00:50:28.460 --> 00:50:30.339
Samantha Brooks: be able to to work that magic.
324
00:50:30.602 --> 00:50:40.307
Kris Hiney: Because I think you know, selection of a horse is so often an emotional response. But, man, if you had data like, if you're like. You can't look at this horse until you look at his data.
325
00:50:40.570 --> 00:50:46.840
Samantha Brooks: Yes, it is such such an emotional thing. It really, really, really is. So
326
00:50:46.850 --> 00:50:55.029
Samantha Brooks: anytime. And I tell people I'm like, don't go and buy a car without a car fax, and I don't even fax them anymore. But we still call them the Carfax. Right?
327
00:50:55.430 --> 00:51:07.150
Samantha Brooks: Try not to buy a horse without something like a comprehensive genetic report. It doesn't necessarily mean that it's going to completely sway your your opinion one way or another, but
328
00:51:07.220 --> 00:51:20.370
Samantha Brooks: it's definitely gonna help to guide you through the process. Maybe give you maybe give you a better, a better sense of confidence in your decision. Or maybe it's gonna feed that little niggling, tiny
329
00:51:20.540 --> 00:51:26.479
Samantha Brooks: kernel of worry in the back of your mind like, Hey, I'm not sure this one is a right fit. Should I take the risk.
330
00:51:26.970 --> 00:51:27.350
Kris Hiney: Yeah.
331
00:51:27.350 --> 00:51:36.869
Samantha Brooks: Maybe that generic reports gonna help just kind of, you know, sway you into listening to that worry and maybe avoid a match. That's that's not. That's not perfect.
332
00:51:36.870 --> 00:51:48.669
Kris Hiney: I'm hoping you can get us to like, you know, where there's horses that can be obese and horses that can't right. That's that's genetic. We need some markers. Stat.
333
00:51:49.050 --> 00:52:01.809
Samantha Brooks: Oh, I know, boy, we try. We did. We? We worked on that for quite a while, because it is such a pervasive problem, and I had a strong interest in metabolic syndrome, and I would keep working on it for sure if I could just get it funded. But
334
00:52:01.830 --> 00:52:02.999
Samantha Brooks: sort of the
335
00:52:03.310 --> 00:52:18.599
Samantha Brooks: the the attention span of our of our funders is pretty short, so laminitis and metabolic syndrome seems to have waned somewhat in the fundable topics. Category. But yeah, same same thing, you know, and even if you have one that tends to be fat, well.
336
00:52:18.970 --> 00:52:26.460
Samantha Brooks: send him send him somewhere where you have fairly poor quality pasture, and you're really concerned about your budget
337
00:52:26.630 --> 00:52:33.800
Samantha Brooks: and get him in the right environment, and he'll be in a great situation, and the one that tends to be thinner. Well, send them to Kentucky in the spring.
338
00:52:33.800 --> 00:52:36.550
Kris Hiney: Exactly. Exactly. Yeah, yeah.
339
00:52:36.764 --> 00:52:37.620
Samantha Brooks: Be in good shape.
340
00:52:37.620 --> 00:53:02.570
Kris Hiney: Well, I really appreciate this was a fun conversation like it it actually, it's got my brain turning about some other things I might need to add to some of my courses on, like, I just am fascinated with like behavior. And like, Hmm! There's really some things you have to pay attention to, and not just a one. Size fits all like I think, that super important to me, and to have a geneticist be like.
341
00:53:02.570 --> 00:53:08.134
Kris Hiney: Oh, cool. It's back here in some DNA.
342
00:53:08.830 --> 00:53:18.299
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, yeah, for sure. It's there's there's definitely something. There's definitely something to it. And I am hoping that we'll get caught up on the
343
00:53:18.450 --> 00:53:46.450
Samantha Brooks: on the horse Research, where we are with with lab rats and our model species. But it's funny. I'll tell you. It's really is one of my collaborators works in. She's a human researcher works on humans. And you know, she's just as frustrated because it seems like the human medical community is coming late to this realization as well. So we're not so far behind the 8 ball. But it'll, it'd be really good to to get a grasp, but.
344
00:53:46.740 --> 00:53:49.746
Kris Hiney: Have you guys tried the lotto as a maybe funding agency.
345
00:53:50.020 --> 00:53:51.440
Samantha Brooks: You know it's funny.
346
00:53:52.650 --> 00:54:08.029
Samantha Brooks: I I I my tickets, not here. It's in a kitchen. But my graduate students. This is this is a running joke is that you know, we buy lottery ticket tickets strictly so that Dr. Brooks can say, when I win the lottery, this is the research program we're gonna run.
347
00:54:08.580 --> 00:54:15.396
Kris Hiney: Well, I tell you what, if you're like the amount of time I spend on writing a grant or buying tickets, which one is gonna pay up for.
348
00:54:15.850 --> 00:54:24.091
Samantha Brooks: Right in that cost, you know. Cost time. Ratio cost benefit ratio there. Yeah. The lottery ticket sometimes looks like the better payoff.
349
00:54:24.750 --> 00:54:25.050
Kris Hiney: Yeah.
350
00:54:25.050 --> 00:54:32.489
Samantha Brooks: So my behavior stuff I've I've sent it to Nsf. Several times. I'm going to rewrite it this summer for my fourth submission to Nsf.
351
00:54:32.590 --> 00:54:46.000
Samantha Brooks: And last summer I was at a meeting and I talked to an Nsf. Program coordinator, and I said, Hey, I'm kind of frustrated. I've sent in 3 times. I feel like I'm getting nowhere. And he goes. Oh, like 3 times I said, Yeah, 3 times, he said, well, you know, we just ran the statistics, and he said, when it comes to Nsf.
352
00:54:46.070 --> 00:54:50.590
Samantha Brooks: The Median number of submissions to an award is 7.
353
00:54:50.590 --> 00:54:52.270
Kris Hiney: Holy buckets!
354
00:54:52.520 --> 00:55:02.289
Samantha Brooks: 7 years. And and so then I was like, Okay, I don't feel so bad. And then he's like and get this, he said the range. It went from one to 17 years.
355
00:55:02.290 --> 00:55:03.020
Kris Hiney: Wow!
356
00:55:03.390 --> 00:55:16.869
Samantha Brooks: Somebody submitted a project 17 years in a row, or 17 submissions in a row, I guess. Sometimes they come around more than once, but sometimes they come around only every 2 years. If we have a Federal Government shutdown right? Somebody submitted the same project 17 times before it got funded. So I'm like.
357
00:55:17.540 --> 00:55:20.589
Kris Hiney: I bet you they didn't have a heavy teaching load.
358
00:55:20.590 --> 00:55:21.570
Samantha Brooks: You know. Right?
359
00:55:23.010 --> 00:55:34.360
Samantha Brooks: Right? Yes. How well they have the time to revise at 17 years in a row. Yeah, this is well, this is why this gets delegated to summer right summer. I'm a 9 month employee. Right? So summer is my.
360
00:55:34.360 --> 00:55:34.930
Kris Hiney: You're freaking.
361
00:55:34.930 --> 00:55:38.880
Samantha Brooks: Not paid to do anything, so I'll volunteer my time writing grants.
362
00:55:41.260 --> 00:55:43.489
Kris Hiney: Oh, it's fun out there, but.
363
00:55:43.490 --> 00:55:50.740
Samantha Brooks: Yeah, yeah, it's it's it's just a blast, just a blast. But yes, we joke all the time at it.
364
00:55:51.210 --> 00:55:52.910
Samantha Brooks: When I win the lottery.
365
00:55:53.420 --> 00:55:54.969
Samantha Brooks: Then we'll get to have a
366
00:55:55.150 --> 00:55:57.940
Samantha Brooks: the research program that we've all dreamed of.
367
00:55:57.940 --> 00:56:17.150
Kris Hiney: Yeah. Well, again, Dr. Brooks really appreciate your time. I know you're super busy, as like, I said, leading equine geneticist. Everybody knows we really appreciate the work that you're doing for the worse industry, cause it. It's it's tough and applaud any information that you're able to send our way.
368
00:56:17.160 --> 00:56:20.469
Samantha Brooks: Absolutely. It's been a lot of fun, and just let me know if you want to do it again.
369
00:56:20.610 --> 00:56:21.920
Kris Hiney: Yeah, absolutely.